Another Georg Baselitz interview, another senseless comment about gender imbalance in the art world. He's said it once, and he'll likely say it again: Women just can't paint.
Baselitz, a German painter famous for his saturated, inverted images, treated the Internet to this very particular prerogative back in 2013, in an interview with Der Spiegel. Women painters, he posited, "simply don't pass the market test," referencing the gaping inequality in price of art made by men versus that made by women. "As always the market is right," he jabbed.
Now Baselitz-- who was born in 1938 -- is giving The Guardian a dose of his outdated logic, bemoaning once again that there are no female equivalents to Picasso, Modigliani or Gauguin.
“Even though the painting classes in art academies are more than 90 percent made up by women, it’s a fact that very few of them succeed," Baselitz unabashedly mused to interviewer Kate Connolly. "It’s nothing to do with education, or chances, or male gallery owners. It’s to do with something else and it’s not my job to answer why it’s so."
It's not his job, yet he goes on to willingly posit a reason for this global gender conundrum.
"If women are ambitious enough to succeed, they can do so, thank you very much. But up until now, they have failed to prove that they want to. Normally, women sell themselves well, but not as painters.”
Well. Thank you, Mr. Baselitz. It's not often that we come across such a sweeping generalization, one that hilariously ignores any social or economic systems that enforce male dominance in art and beyond. Really, we don't get enough of these shallow revelations that deny the existence of oppression, reducing success to a game of objective determination. Your words are the critical equivalent of a "talk to the hand" gesture to those pesky feminists calling for a broader understanding of gender, race and class relations in the marketplace. Where's an applause emoji when I need it?
Sigh. Cue bitterly sarcastic eye roll directed at all 360 degrees of the patriarchy. May the Guerrilla Girls have mercy on your soul.
While we could draw Baselitz's attention to a number of realities connected to labor: the institutional hurdles of motherhood, women of color's historical lack of access to higher education, or even the gender pay gap to just name a few, we doubt any of this would be news to him. So, instead, we leave you, Georg, with this:
Yayoi Kusama
![yayoi kusama]()
Frida Kahlo
![frida kahlo]()
Mary Cassatt
![cassatt]()
Faith Ringgold
![faith ringgold]()
Georgia O'Keeffe
![georgia okeeffe]()
Artemisia Gentileschi
![art]()
Joan Mitchell
![joan mitchell]()
Mickalene Thomas
![mickalene thomas]()
Helen Frankenthaler
![helen frankenthaler]()
Marlene Dumas
![marlene dumas]()
Romaine Brooks
![romaine]()
Lynette Yiadom-Boakye
![lynette yiadomboakye]()
Lisa Yuskavage
![lisa yuskavage]()
And that's just off the top of my head.
Baselitz, a German painter famous for his saturated, inverted images, treated the Internet to this very particular prerogative back in 2013, in an interview with Der Spiegel. Women painters, he posited, "simply don't pass the market test," referencing the gaping inequality in price of art made by men versus that made by women. "As always the market is right," he jabbed.
Now Baselitz-- who was born in 1938 -- is giving The Guardian a dose of his outdated logic, bemoaning once again that there are no female equivalents to Picasso, Modigliani or Gauguin.
“Even though the painting classes in art academies are more than 90 percent made up by women, it’s a fact that very few of them succeed," Baselitz unabashedly mused to interviewer Kate Connolly. "It’s nothing to do with education, or chances, or male gallery owners. It’s to do with something else and it’s not my job to answer why it’s so."
It's not his job, yet he goes on to willingly posit a reason for this global gender conundrum.
"If women are ambitious enough to succeed, they can do so, thank you very much. But up until now, they have failed to prove that they want to. Normally, women sell themselves well, but not as painters.”
Well. Thank you, Mr. Baselitz. It's not often that we come across such a sweeping generalization, one that hilariously ignores any social or economic systems that enforce male dominance in art and beyond. Really, we don't get enough of these shallow revelations that deny the existence of oppression, reducing success to a game of objective determination. Your words are the critical equivalent of a "talk to the hand" gesture to those pesky feminists calling for a broader understanding of gender, race and class relations in the marketplace. Where's an applause emoji when I need it?
Sigh. Cue bitterly sarcastic eye roll directed at all 360 degrees of the patriarchy. May the Guerrilla Girls have mercy on your soul.
While we could draw Baselitz's attention to a number of realities connected to labor: the institutional hurdles of motherhood, women of color's historical lack of access to higher education, or even the gender pay gap to just name a few, we doubt any of this would be news to him. So, instead, we leave you, Georg, with this:
Yayoi Kusama
Frida Kahlo
Mary Cassatt
Faith Ringgold
Georgia O'Keeffe
Artemisia Gentileschi
Joan Mitchell
Mickalene Thomas
Helen Frankenthaler
Marlene Dumas
Romaine Brooks
Lynette Yiadom-Boakye
Lisa Yuskavage
And that's just off the top of my head.
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.