Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

Jared Haibon Gets Candid About His 'Bachelor In Paradise' Love Triangle

$
0
0

”I was frustrated by a lot of things.”


When you talk to Jared Haibon, the soft-spoken ― and sought after ― alum of both “The Bachelorette” and “Bachelor In Paradise” (x2), the first thing you notice is how eloquent and even-keeled he is. But even the calmest man in Bachelor Nation can be pushed too far. 


This season, Jared made a connection with Caila Quinn, who made it far on Ben Higgins’s season of “The Bachelor.” After his first season on “Paradise” saw him bogged down in dealing with the unrequited passion of Ashley Iaconetti, many hoped he’d finally have a real shot at romance on the show. Instead, Ashley arrived herself, and wasted no time confronting Caila, crying over Jared, and creating a tense situation for all involved. Caila and Jared eventually left “Paradise” before filming wrapped to pursue their relationship off-camera, and broke up amicably after six weeks of dating.



While Ashley has been outspoken throughout the season in her own defense, and Caila has also opened up about her experience, Jared has mostly remained silent about his relationships with the two women and his time on the season ― until now. This week Jared spoke candidly with HuffPost’s Here To Make Friends podcast about what happened during his final run on “Paradise,” why he was frustrated by pretty much everyone, and where he and Caila (and he and Ashley) stand now. 


On the most frustrating thing about “Paradise”...


“If I had any idea that Ashley was coming into Paradise, even if it was a small percentage, to either be with me or get over me, I would never have gone to Paradise. So I think that was one of the things I was most frustrated by.”


On talking to Ashley about the possibility of going back to “Paradise”...


“We talked a lot about it. And then she got a phone call about the possibility of her going on, so she was more understanding the more we talked. We both decided that we needed to make this decision individually, and that if we went we would be going for other people. I knew that she had an interest in Wells, and I had mentioned Caila to her. ... I honestly thought everything was gonna be OK.”


On where his relationship stands with Ashley and with Caila today... 


“While I was in ‘Paradise,’ I had a lot of frustrations towards the things Ashley said and did, and discussed her approach and her unwillingness to try to move past myself until Wells came.... It was a very troubling time for awhile between Ashley and myself. We had a lot of very difficult long and hard conversations, but we talked through everything and I’m still friends with [her].”


“Caila and myself are still friends. Once we left the show, I think there was just so much that happened in Paradise that it was very difficult to move past. Even after the show, I think we had a lot of difficult times. There were some nights where it was causing us so much stress to be together in terms of the conversations we had to have, that we didn’t have a strong enough foundation to kind of hold all the weight that was coming down upon us. And that’s what happened. Caila and myself are still friends, though.”


Why he stayed out of the media frenzy during the season... 


“I am so attached to what happened in ‘Paradise.’ Even though it was two months prior and I had moved on to a certain extent, watching it just makes you relive all those emotions that you went through and kind of puts puts you right back where you were in ‘Paradise.’ It’s very difficult to talk about, and so I think that’s why I decided to just let Caila and let Ashley talk about how they felt and what was happening, and you know, when the time comes, I’ll be more than happy to speak my mind.” 


To hear the full interview, listen to HuffPost’s “Bachelor” podcast, Here To Make Friends. (Skip to around the 28-minute mark for the Jared interview.) 







Do people love “The Bachelor,” “The Bachelorette” and “Bachelor in Paradise,” or do they love to hate these shows? It’s unclear. But here at “Here to Make Friends,” we both love and love to hate them — and we love to snarkily dissect each episode in vivid detail. Podcast edited by Nick Offenberg.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


16 Castle Weddings That Took Place Right Here In The U.S.

$
0
0

Flying to Europe to tie the knot in a real castle formerly roamed by kings and queens is a bit too budget-busting for most. The good news is that there are plenty of castle-like buildings right here in the U.S.


Check out 16 regal weddings below and get inspired.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Obama To Award National Medal Of Arts To Mel Brooks, Morgan Freeman

$
0
0

President Barack Obama will recognize the comedic talents of Mel Brooks, the Motown sound of Berry Gordy and the iconic voice of Morgan Freeman on Sept. 22 when he hands out the National Medal of Arts and National Humanities Medal at the White House.


Obama has said the star-studded annual event has been one of his favorites during his time in office.


The White House released the list of honorees on Wednesday, including a couple of people with ties to Obama. Freeman is involved with the Obama Foundation, which is raising money for Obama’s presidential library in Chicago.


Celebrity chef Jose Andres, who will receive a humanities medal, has worked with the White House on immigration reform issues.


Andres is being sued by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for backing out of a deal to open a restaurant in his new Washington hotel after Trump made disparaging comments about Mexican immigrants.


Also among the 24 honorees: musicians Wynton Marsalis and Santiago Jimenez; composer Philip Glass; actor Audra McDonald; and authors Sandra Cisneros, Ron Chernow, Rudolfo Anaya, and James McBride.


(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Andrew Hay)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Professor John McIntyre's Brutally Honest 'Trigger Warning' For New Students Of His 'Dull' Class

$
0
0

Some professors go over the syllabus during the first classes of the school year. Loyola University Maryland’s John McIntyre has a more unconventional approach. 


The professor deadpans in the video below what he describes as a “trigger warning” for new students on the first day of his copy editing class at the university’s Department of Communication. 


“This is going to be a difficult class,” he says. “And part of what is going to be difficult in this class is that if you are like the 700 or so students who have preceded you here, you are wobbly in English grammar and usage.”





McIntyre goes on to warn that the course is “unrelievedly, thoroughly, appallingly dull.”


He cites one student who complained in an evaluation that McIntyre did the same thing over and over, day after day.


“And that is exactly it,” McIntyre says. “Editing is done word by word, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph and it is done that way every time.” 


Since The Baltimore Sun posted McIntyre’s introductory statement online, his “trigger warning” video has garnered more than two million views.


Be sure to watch the entire video to the end, when McIntyre finishes with the perfect ending for a first class.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hispanic Heritage Month Is Here, And We’re Ready To Celebrate

$
0
0

Hispanic Heritage Month is upon us, and that means it’s time to celebrate and honor the many contributions Hispanics have made to the United States.


The annual celebration kicks off Sept. 15, a fact that confuses many who wonder why, unlike Black History Month or Pride Month, the 30-day period celebrating Hispanic heritage and history begins mid-month. Well, wonder no more, because we have the answer. 


Back in 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson decreed that “National Hispanic Heritage Week” would begin on Sept. 15, a date that coincides with the independence of five Latin American countries: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. Mexico and Chile also celebrate their Independence Days soon after, on Sept. 16 and Sept. 18, respectively. 


Rightly unsatisfied with just a week to honor Latinos’ achievements, Representative Esteban Torres of California submit a bill in 1987 to expand the celebration to a full month. The following year President Ronald Reagan made it so, extending the yearly occasion through Oct. 15. A move that allowed El Día de la Raza to fall under Hispanic Heritage Month, as well.  


HuffPost Latino Voices takes celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month very seriously. Last year, we released Latinos Break The Mold, an interactive photo series that delved into how racially diverse the Hispanic ethnicity can be with the help of Gina Rodriguez, John Leguizamo, Dascha Polanco and many more. The more than 50 participants explained in their own words what it means to be Latino today and how their roots have shaped them. 



This year, we’re broadening our horizons. We’ve planned a series of original videos and written content that spotlights underserved intersectional identities, like LGBTQ Latinos, and highlights what makes our history and contributions an integral part of American culture today. You can read and watch all of our Hispanic Heritage Month content here.


But we also want to hear from you, our readers. With our new blogger platform, we look forward to reading more about individuals’ experience with heritage, orgullo and perspective during this month of celebration. 


Hispanic heritage doesn’t solely live in the past; it has the potential to influence how we experience the present, and how we will go on to shape our shared future. 


Join the conversation this Hispanic Heritage Month as we celebrate our gentes’ rich and nuanced cultures and traditions. We invite you to follow our Hispanic Heritage Month coverage on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram with the hashtag #HHM16.  

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 Fall Looks To Lure The Person You'll Settle For In The Winter

$
0
0

Now that fall is here, anybody who plans on having a drop of sex in the upcoming colder months is rightfully looking for ways to make sure they project “chill” and “not looking for anything serious” to attract potential suitors this fall.


But finding a winter fling is impossible! The people you want to date are either in relationships or they don’t like you. And most other people aren’t “fun to be around” or “listen to what you’re saying 70 percent of the time.”


But as winter marches closer and closer, we must think about looking our best so we can honestly try to attract people we like but then ultimately decide to hook up with somebody we’re not crazy about over and over again while exerting minimal effort in what a robot would call a relationship.


“But how can I snag MY special someone that my family will never hear about?” you might ask.


Never fear!


Peep these hot new looks that will surely rope in that person with whom you’ll “mutually” end things come April.



Deep Red Lipstick + Zip Up + Big Floppy Hat


Wow, nothing says “hey brad. just so you know, I don’t like to have convos over text, just text me when you need to tell me something and we can just talk in person / no, I’m not upset,” more than this traditional autumn ensemble. 



Oversized Sweater + Caribou Hide Skirt


Wow, after you find out your coworker who is SO funny and SO cool and just “gets it” is engaged, the dude who keeps misspelling your/you’re name on Bumble will LOVE this classic.



Huge Puff Sheep Jacket + Parental Advisory Explicit Content Sweater 


Wow, do I hear wedding bells? No, I don’t. That’s the theme music to “Narcos,” a show you’ve been watching every weekend with a girl you pray isn’t falling in love with you. 



Orange Cream Duster + 60’s Shades + Mole


Wow. [Austin Powers voice] Do I make you horny, baby? Do I? DO I!? Good! Because if we didn’t have sex, you’d be dead to me. It’s not that I don’t like you. It’s just that I know in my bones we wont be growing old together. So it’s good to know that you have the desire to fulfill our singular function.



Tan Gentleman Jacket + Hoodie + Shades + Beard Cream


I mean wow, this “What if Scott Ackerman wrote for Vice?” look is perfect for the man looking to settle down with somebody who ALSO threw in the towel mid-August. Happy hunting, bruh bruh!



Grey Turtleneck + Mauve Kaleidoscope Skirt + Dead Bobcat


Wow. Just, wow.  Sure, you spent two months’ salary on an outfit only to find out at Kacie’s halloween party that Justin JUST came out. But on the bright side, if you take your friends advice and “stop bringing that Eric guy around,” you can learn to love this contemporary pre-winter wardrobe.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Charming 'La La Land' Is The Early Front-Runner For Best Picture

$
0
0

Here at the Toronto Film Festival, audiences almost always cheer when end credits roll. (Canadians, so kind!) On Monday night, as the much-anticipated “La La Land” faded to black, the crowd sat patiently, applauding and dabbing away tears. The real ovation, though, happened moments later. The lights came up, and director Damien Chazelle and his cast took the stage. The theater erupted in the most ebullient moment I’ve witnessed at the festival over the past week. The energy was rapturous. 


“La La Land,” Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling’s third film together, is going to be a big deal. Its positive press originated at the recent Venice and Telluride film festivals, and, with the start of Oscar season fermenting as Toronto winds down, we appear to have an early Best Picture front-runner on our hands. 


Chazelle’s brainchild is doused in nostalgia. It’s a throwback to movie musicals of the 1940s and ‘50s, tracing a charmed romance between an aspiring actress and a struggling jazz pianist in present-day Los Angeles. “La La Land” seems universally beloved, two hours of pastel joy that fades into a bittersweet garnish. It opens with a musical number ostensibly staged in one take along a freeway traffic jam; stalled commuters burst from their cars to sing and dance with a rush of wonder. By the time the movie zeroes in on its central characters, Mia and Sebastian, you are already smiling. It’s the sort of lovely display that people will want to see over and over. We could be looking at a box-office hit perfect for the holiday season ― and probably for all time, as my pal Mike Ryan noted at Uproxx



Here’s where I think it will hook Oscar voters, who earlier this year chose the quiet “Spotlight” over the dour “Revenant”: “La La Land” is a pleasant technical feat that appears more driven by Technicolor than it is special effects. The Los-Angeles-is-a-character cliché certainly applies, and Chazelle, who directed “Whiplash,” uses a rich color palette throughout, making it a shoo-in for Best Production Design. It’s an ode to toiling artists and everyday romance, and we know the Academy adores films that use Hollywood as a literal or figurative backdrop. (See: “Birdman,” “The Artist,” “L.A. Confidential,” “All About Eve.”) Winning Best Picture without a screenplay nod is hard, and most musicals aren’t known for their dialogue. But “La La Land” uses songs sparingly ― there are plenty of charming words to net Chazelle a nomination in that field. It worked for “Chicago” a little over a decade ago.


On top of that, Stone has just soared to the top of the Best Actress race. Having nabbed a supporting nomination in 2015 for “Birdman,” she already has a wide appeal. This is her best performance to date. Her soft smile and attentive eyes give Mia the same warmth that Stone herself carries during press appearances. Lionsgate is planning a hefty awards spell, and Stone will charm the hell out of voters, much the way Cate Blanchett and Jennifer Lawrence have in recent years. The path is already paved in Stone anyway, considering she took home the Venice Film Festival’s Best Actress accolade. Gosling is nice in “La La,” but nowhere near as remarkable.



And then there are the songs. Oh, the songs. We’ve already heard part of one in the trailer, and the rest are toe-tapping carols that could allow Stone and Gosling to recreate scenes on the Oscars stage. Woven delicately into the film, the musical numbers are staged in the loveliest of locales, particularly one overlooking the Hollywood Hills at dusk. It is impossible not to swoon. In a relatively bleak year for cinema, “La La Land” offers some redemption. 


Of course, it’s cheap to reduce a movie to its awards potential, especially five months before the Oscars. “La La Land” deserves ample attention outside that circuit and will surely find it. Thanks to “Crazy, Stupid, Love,” Gosling and Stone are already a beloved cinematic pairing. They have wonderful chemistry in “La La,” and they’ll carry it throughout the press tour. While the film sags a bit here and there, its opening and closing sequences are so marvelous that it won’t matter much.


This is the closest we’ve come to a contemporary Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire moment. Treasure it.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

10 Shows That Didn't Get Emmys Love, But Should Get Yours

$
0
0

There are many, many good television shows out there these days, and hardly enough time — or awards — to give them all their due. Plus, not everyone is going to agree on which of our current small-screen offerings are truly the best. While one person stumps for Rachel Bloom’s nuanced and hilarious delivery on “Crazy Ex-Girlfriend,” another one could justifiably argue that Andrew Lincoln’s performance on “The Walking Dead” is truly where it’s at. 


While Sunday night’s focus will be on the Emmy-nominated shows, actors, writers and co. at this year’s award ceremony, don’t forget to check out the worthy shows that fell short of nabbing a nod for 2016. Ladies and gentlemen, 10 shows for your Roku queue consideration.



“Halt and Catch Fire” (AMC)


What might sound a little hokey ― a show about Texas’ Silicon Prairie and the rise of personal computers in the 1980s ― ends up being deeply emotional and perfectly nerdy. First off, the opening credits of “Halt and Catch Fire” constitute a work of art. Secondly, Lee Pace and Mackenzie Davis are some of the most captivating actors, the former playing an ex-IBM visionary gone rogue and the latter a budding coder raising a video game company from the ground up. If you’re turned off by the tech angle, don’t be ― this show is gorgeously shot, gorgeously acted, and a smart way to fill the shoes AMC’s other mega hit, “Mad Men,” left behind. ― Katy Brooks



”Superstore” (NBC)


Workplace comedies are nothing new, but NBC’s “Superstore,” set in a big-box chain à la Walmart, brings a fresh and funny perspective to the genre. Instead of cubicle stiffs, our heroes are blue-vested minimum-wage-earners who must navigate their relationships among towering toilet paper displays and questionable labor practices (in one episode, the employees are locked in overnight after staying to work late, unable to contact corporate to get them out). A premise that could have quickly devolved into hacky jokes on class instead has given NBC a smart, funny offering — even more so toward the end of its first season — and hopefully the industry will recognize that as it continues. ― Jill Capewell



”Show Me a Hero” (HBO)


From the same person who brought you “The Wire” comes “Show Me a Hero,” the 2015 HBO miniseries based on Lisa Belkin’s 1999 nonfiction book of the same name. David Simon tells the impassioned story of the Yonkers, New York, desegregation and public housing battle. The series delves deep into local politics, racial issues and public housing all while taking you back to the 1980s, bringing recent history to the forefront. Oscar Isaac plays the city’s mayor, Nick Wasicsko, an ambitious young politician. He owns this role and manages to hook you immediately. At just six episodes, this miniseries is an easy one to digest. “Show Me a Hero” didn’t receive any Emmy nods, but the limited series is worth watching and is available for your viewing pleasure on HBO Go. ― Lauren Moraski



“Full Frontal with Samantha Bee” (TBS)


What if I told you, dear reader, that a half-hour news comedy program exists on TV right now that has registered 100 percent on Rotten Tomatoes? Who, exactly, first pops in your head? Most likely, your mind has raced directly to the face of HBO’s John Oliver. But no, for as brilliant as “Last Weekend Tonight” is, the show has registered only a mere 97 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. The perfect 100 goes, instead, to TBS’ “Full Frontal with Samantha Bee.” Bee’s show has been so consistently funny and brilliant since its debut that it’s making the head honchos at Comedy Central look downright incompetent for not even approaching her about filling the shoes Jon Stewart left as host of “The Daily Show.” Now, again, Bee has been snubbed, not receiving a nomination for Outstanding Variety Talk Series at the 2016 Emmys. Perhaps the reason is its February debut, which registers pretty late in the eligibility period. But forgive me if I can’t help but think there’s another potential reason for the snub that is so frustratingly predictable I don’t even have to say it. I suppose next year we’ll find out which one it was. ― Maxwell Strachan



”Lady Dynamite” (Netflix)


Longtime comedian’s comedian Maria Bamford produced and stars in this Netflix original. The show is somewhat autobiographical of Bamford’s life, mixing stories of her rise as a comedian with her struggles with bipolar disorder. The latter of those subjects as well as the ambitiously inventive storytelling ― think magical realism, multiple time jumps per episode and aesthetic absurdism (such as her agent’s office having a huge sign outside that states it’s her agent’s office) ― seems to have scared mainstream audiences away.


But “Lady Dynamite” easily has the best jokes on any television show this year, as well as the most vulnerable presentation of any protagonist. Bamford made tons of money playing the “Crazy Target Lady” in advertisements earlier this decade, banking on her own experience with mental health. The comedian pays penance for her past role through the first season, calling the corporation out for being evil and exploitative in various narratives that peak in a climax involving a sugar-demon Mark McGrath. If you’re one of those people who “didn’t get” shows like “Arrested Development” or “South Park” when they first came out, only to join the bandwagon about their brilliance years later, don’t make that same mistake again. “Lady Dynamite” is the kind of show that’ll inspire countless more throughout the next decade.  ― Todd Van Luling



”Grey’s Anatomy” (ABC)


“Grey’s Anatomy” has been on the air since 2005. Yes, that’s right, haters. After 12 seasons (going on 13), you’d think Ellen Pompeo, who plays the titular character on the ABC show, would’ve gotten some Emmys love. Nope. Pompeo has never been recognized for her work as Dr. Meredith Grey, and this year could’ve and should’ve been her time to shine. People. McDreamy left the show died, but Pompeo stayed on and gave some of the best performances of her life. Even though some think this show has overstayed its welcome (never!), it’s lived a longer life than any of Shonda Rhimes’ other shows. Give her and Pompeo an Emmy already! ― Leigh Blickley



”The Leftovers” (HBO)


While this HBO drama had a rocky first season, critics and fans seemed to agree that the story of people left behind years after a “Sudden Departure,” where a noticeable chunk of the population mysteriously disappeared, truly came into its own for its second turn on the small screen. The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences had a number of stellar performances to nod at — as our resident film guru Matthew Jacobs wrote, “Carrie Coon. Justin Theroux. Regina King. Christopher Eccleston. Liv Tyler. Amy Brenneman. Ann Dowd. Pick one! Any of them! Please! (But especially Carrie Coon.)” It’s been renewed for a third and reportedly final season, so get it together, Television Academy! ― JC



”You’re the Worst” (FX)


Let’s talk about the ensemble cast of “You’re the Worst.” Aya Cash’s turn as Gretchen has been hailed as “the best depiction of clinical depression ever.” Chris Geere is so charming as Jimmy, he’s become fans’ first choice for the next Doctor (please!). Kether Donohue is a national treasure; her character Lindsay is a certified scene-stealer. And Desmin Borges is currently bringing a rough-around-the-edges story of a young military veteran living with PTSD to FX viewers. (I could also write all day about how great recurring performances by Brandon Mychal Smith and Todd Robert Anderson are.) The show is ostensibly about forming relationships in your 20s, and how feelings of inescapable hopelessness plague each and every minute of a 20- or 30-something existence. But the plot twists and turns in pleasantly unexpected ways, all the while draped in a dark comedy that’s truly one of the most intriguing things on TV. ― KB



”BoJack Horseman”


Sorry, but there is no way in hell that “The Simpsons” deserves an Emmy nomination for anything that transpired during Season 27. Yet, when I go to www.emmys.com, there it is: a nomination for Outstanding Animated Program. That pathetic excuse of a makeshift lifetime achievement award would be enough for a screed in and of itself. But compound that truth with the fact that the “BoJack Horseman” episode “Fish Out of Water” is nowhere to be found on the same page, and we have the basis for an all-out revolution. “Fish Out of Water,” for those who don’t know, was the fourth episode of “BoJack Horseman” Season 3 and is a beautiful tale that takes place underwater and with almost no dialogue whatsoever. In it, BoJack Horseman (everyone’s favorite depressive, alcoholic horse-man movie star) tries to apologize to an old friend, make it through the press circuit and deal with an abandoned baby seamonkey. It’s a beautiful, subtle piece of art that deserved to be recognized — if not the entirety of “BoJack” itself — and instead, we’re talking about “The Simpsons”? Are you shitting me? ― M S



”The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” (CBS)


Nation, we have a problem. Stephen Colbert, perennial Emmy nominee and previous winner, has been snubbed from the Variety Talk category. Yeah, this is serious. Unlike his “Colbert Report” days, ratings haven’t been been coming too easily for Colbert’s “Late Show” gig. But have the chants of “Stephen, Stephen” truly stopped ringing in your ears? Despite dropping his character, Colbert is still the same quippy, “Lord of the Rings”-loving dude he’s always been. Truly, this is the one snub to rule them all. ― Bill Bradley

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


George W. Bush To Release An Art Book, Because 2016 Is A Surreal Dream

$
0
0

It’s 2016. A former reality TV star is running for president of the United States. And a former president is pursuing a post-career life as an artist. What a time to be alive.


George W. Bush, who has previously surprised many a viewer with his paintings of puppies, kitties, Putin, and his near-naked body, has recently turned his attention to America’s veterans. His upcoming book, Portraits of Courage: A Commander in Chief’s Tribute to America’s Warriorswill feature 66 portraits of men and women who have served in the military since 9/11. 


Bush’s new art endeavor, which he billed as “more than an art book,” is meant to bridge the gap in understanding between civilian and military, illuminating the many issues veterans face when they return home from service. To supplement each portrait, Bush wrote a story explaining the subject’s experiences with war and civilian life. 



The subject matter is a serious one. But as Carey Dunne wrote on Hyperallergic, there are certain politically relevant themes glaringly absent from Bush’s latest portfolio. For example, “paintings of prisoners held without trial at Guantanamo Bay, paintings of the millions of Americans who lost their homes during the 2008 financial crisis, or paintings of ‘the ghost of the Iraqi child that follows him everywhere.’”


Art critics can be harsh.


An exhibition of Bush’s original paintings will be on view starting March 2, 2017, at Dallas’ George W. Bush Presidential Center. All proceeds from the book will benefit the center, a non-profit organization whose Military Service Initiative is focused on helping post-9/11 veterans.



Portraits of Courage will be published by Crown on Feb. 28, 2017.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

You've Never Seen A Christina Aguilera Tribute Like This Before

$
0
0



French dancer-choreographer Yanis Marshall put a pretty fierce spin on Christina Aguilera’s “Telepathy” that you just have to see to believe. 


Marshall, who is openly gay, was a finalist on the eighth season of “Britain’s Got Talent,” where he performed slick routines in stiletto heels. He lent his signature style to the above dance video for the song, which Aguilera recorded for the 1970s-themed Netflix series, “The Get Down.” 


The clip, which also showcases the moves of Danielle Polanco and Aisha Francis, is a collaboration between Marshall and choreographers Rich + Tone, who also directed the video. The men have worked with A-list stars like Michael Jackson, Madonna and Jennifer Lopez over the years, but nonetheless said teaming up with Marshall was a unique experience. 


“His style is effortless, but very dynamic, and creates a magnetism that is involuntary,” Rich+Tone told The Huffington Post in an email. As it turned out, Marshall was on board with emphasizing the “girl power” feel of the new song. “We all agreed that the choreography should make women feel free and empowered. The track has escapism, magic [and] freedom, which we tried our best to reflect.” 


No doubt Xtina herself would be proud. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

For Women, Agatha Christie's Murder Mysteries Are As Soothing As Bedtime Stories

$
0
0

“If you could order a crime as one orders dinner,” detective Hercule Poirot asks in Agatha Christie’s The ABC Murders, “What would you choose?”


“Let me see now,” his buddy Captain Arthur Hastings replies. “Let’s review the menu. Robbery? Forgery? No, I think not. Rather too vegetarian. No, it must be murder ― red blooded murder. With trimmings, of course.” 


This tone ― refined, witty, and just a little bit bloodthirsty ― characterizes Agatha Christie’s 66 murder mystery novels, published between 1920 and 1976. Christie’s written world exists in a sort of British fairytale bubble ― assuming, of course, your fairytales include multiple homicides. Her stories’ settings are limited to middle and upper class suburbia, and often demarcated even more tightly ― taking place on a train, a deserted island, or a seasonal home.


The murders that occur there are swift and out of sight; not a huge fan of gore, Christie ensured the carnage was reasonably minimal. Poison ― the cleanest of killers ― was her go-to way to go, a good blundering would, on special occasions, really ruin a carpet. The Queen of Mystery could choose her crimes as one selects a tasty meal, and clearly, she had a type.


The ratio of women victims to men, in Christie’s novels, is roughly two to one. In reality, men are more likely to be victims of homicide than women. Yet women are more commonly cast as victims in literature, film, art, the media, and hence, the imagination. Although the exaggeration of female victims doesn’t reflect real life, the resounding fear that results from it is real. And for women, that sticks. 


It’s not too surprising that Christie’s pattern mirrored this norm, whether she was critiquing it or conforming to it ― or a little of both. 



Christie’s stories read more like elaborate puzzles or living board games than the typical true crime narrative. Characters adhere to motives, alibis and stereotypical quirks, most lacking the emotional depth to truly contemplate what’s at stake when a life is lost ― or stolen. Crime writer Ruth Rendell criticized Christie’s style, claiming that to call her characters “card-board cut outs [would be] an insult to cardboard.” Nevertheless, when one drops dead, or even two or three, the loss is way easier to grieve. 


While death is always the crux of Christie’s tales, her stories assume the tone of a comedy of manners more so than melancholic drama. Blood on the nice cushions? What a shame! Characters like Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple bust on the scene, eager to uncover who did such a thing and how. Meaning, literally, how: through what sequence of events? Never: how could a human being possibly take another’s life?



Detectives, murderers, and most innocent bystanders shared a mutual excitement, and even pleasure, in the face of red-blooded killing.



The killers in Christie-town are not maniacs, serial killers, child molesters or rapists. They were not systematically conditioned to resort to violence, psychologically traumatized during childhood, or suffering from mental illness. Nothing that would spoil her fun. No, the murderers were unlikely suspects with a specific motive in mind, be it money, love, revenge, or shutting up someone who knows too much. 


What truly makes Christie the master of her craft, however, is her ability to keep readers guessing, challenging them to decode the clues before the detective. A task which seemed virtually impossible. 



Christie’s stories read more like elaborate puzzles or living board games than the typical true crime narrative.



I read my first Agatha Christie book, Ten Little Indians (its named based on a controversial children’s rhyme)in fourth grade. In it, 10 individuals are mysteriously invited to weekend on a small, isolated island. They bunk up in a mansion together, where they discover the rhyme “Ten Little Indians” eerily awaiting them in each bedroom, as well as 10 soldier figurines resting on the dining room table. 


One by one, the guests are murdered, and each time, a figurine broken. Given the lack of depth allotted to each character, their deaths felt quite like breaking a precious yet not irreplaceable object. A rush of panic, a moment of outrage, a deep breath, and back to business as usual. 


Right before the killer was revealed, my teacher challenged the fourth grade class to write down their prime suspect on a piece of paper and pass it forward. There were around 25 people in the class. No one guessed correctly. 



Thankfully, Poirot and Marple are savvier detectives than my fellow fourth grade sleuths. When they uncover the killer, there is no ambiguity, no second guessing. Crimes cunning and gruesome are fully unraveled and cleaned up, communicating that though murder is a messy business, it can be dealt with in a proper and genteel manner, and eventually, order will be restored. 


The peace of mind that washes over in a bow-tied Christie denouement is comforting to all readers, but especially to women, disproportionately victims of domestic violence and rape. Women who now constitute an estimated 80 percent of the crime book reader population. Women who are no strangers to imagining the various ways their bodies could be harassed, beaten, raped or killed. Women who can’t help but clutch their keys in one hand, their phone in the other while walking home at night, their breath quickening as a man slows his pace or stares too long.


For many women, death as Christie imagines it would be a best-case scenario. Or, at least, best-case murder scenario. 



For many women, death as Christie imagines it would be a best-case scenario. Or, at least, best-case murder scenario.



Christie, born on September 15, 1890, was quite the morbid lady herself ― she reportedly adored funerals from a young age. But many women I know who do not attend funerals adore reading about crime and not, as Christie put it, the “vegetarian” kind. It’s as if some women have, almost out of necessity, become fluent in the language of their greatest fear, as if talking, reading or joking about murder can ease the constant dread they experience.


On their podcast My Favorite Murder,” comedians Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark deal with their anxiety-induced fear of being murdering by talking about it, obsessively, in hilarious and quite indelicate terms. In one episode, for example, the women joke that it is creepier when men murder women without raping them because, then, they posit, why do it all? The hosts clarify, again and again, that they do not condone murder in any way, shape or form. That they joke as a way to cope with their own constant terror, to look the ugly thing right in the face and say “ha ha ha!”


Kilgariff and Hardstark are, in a way, the antithesis of Christie. They both find the fun in murder, but while Kilgariff and Hardstark revel in all the gruesome details, Christie regards murder with the same orderly decorum usually reserved for a spilled glass of wine. Unfortunate, but fixable. Christie responds to this reading of her work in the dedication of Hercule Poirot’s Christmas, written to her brother-in-law. 



It’s as if some women have, almost out of necessity, become fluent in the language of their greatest fear



You complained that my murders were getting too refined ― anaemic, in fact. You yearned for a ‘good violent murder with lots of blood.’ A murder where there was no doubt about its being murder! So this is your special story ― written for you. I hope it may please.” Christie then describes the “violent” murder in terms of the mess it creates ― “heavy furniture overturned ... china vases lay splintered on the floor.” Oh dear! 


Kilgariff and Hardstark tackle their anxiety by digging up history’s most disgusting atrocities ― those that mix abuse, neglect, poverty, obsession, derangement, molestation, and torture are best. Christie, however, delivers women’s nightmares in the most delectable packaging possible. “I specialize in murders of quiet, domestic interest,” she told Nigel Dennis in a 1956 interview. “Give me a nice deadly phial to play with and I am happy.”



For women who lie in bed at night with murder on the mind, Christie offers the G-rated indulgence that will deliver spine-tingles and goosebumps but no stomach-churning nausea.



Christie liked to reference nursery rhymes in her titles. Oftentimes, as with Ten Little Indians, the rhymes factor into the murderer’s plot or the clues that eventually help solve the case. Other examples include One, Two, Buckle My Shoe; Hickory, Dickory, Dock; Pocket Full of Rye; as well as the short stories “Four and Twenty Blackbirds” and “Sing a Song of Sixpence.” Christie’s mysteries don’t just employ nursery rhymes as tactics to crack open a case. Rather, they are nursery rhymes in themselves, grown up bedtime stories that put women face to face with their fears, sanitized and tidied up. 


Agatha Christie may have been hungry for blood, but she hated to make a mess. Instead of aiming for a murder most foul, she crafted killing in its most palatable form ― in a quarantined space, with civilized people, one very clever detective, and a resolution that left no wiggle room. For women who lie in bed at night with murder on the mind, Christie offers the G-rated indulgence that will deliver spine tingles and goosebumps but no stomach-churning nausea. 


For the modern day lady who likes to face her fears head on, but perhaps, with a little sugar on top, why not wind down the evening with Five Little Pigs? Like a children’s lullaby, it will put you right to sleep. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Bridget Jones's Baby' Is Worth The Wait, And A Whole Lot Of Fun

$
0
0



I’m ready for this, there’s no denying


That lyric ― from Jess Glynne’s song “Hold My Hand” ― has been appropriately featured in the trailers for “Bridget Jones’s Baby,” and pretty much explains our feelings on the new installment of the beloved film franchise finally coming out. The rom-com is definitely worth the wait, and, let us assure you, it will make you belly laugh from beginning to end. 


The film sees the long-awaited on-screen return of Renée Zellweger, who took six years off to focus on life outside of Hollywood. Of course, it was the one and only Bridget Jones who convinced the actress to re-enter her career, and our hearts, once again.


“It was pretty selfishly motivated, actually,” Zellweger told AOL Build host Ricky Camilleri of reviving the character. “She’s kind of fun. She’s really fun to play!”


Thinking back, Zellweger beat out a competitive list of actresses to nab the coveted role of Bridget, an accident-prone, self-conscious, love-hungry British book publisher turned television producer, in 2001’s “Bridget Jones’s Diary.” Considering she was born and raised in Texas, Zellweger being cast over stars like Kate Winslet, Toni Collette and Cate Blanchett was a huge deal. 







Despite some controversy, she ended up capturing the character perfectly and even received an Academy Award nomination for her work. Now, with 12 years passing since the release of the not-so-great “Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason,” bringing Bridget back to the big screen is scary but beyond fulfilling for Zellweger. She’s aware that the return of the franchise could fail, but tried her best to ensure that wouldn’t happen during production. “[I was] just participating and making sure that what we were doing was going to be worthwhile and not just ‘good enough.’ ‘Cause just ‘good enough’ is not good enough,” she said on Build. 


Well, with the addition of Patrick Dempsey and the always memorable Emma Thompson, combined with the return of Zellweger, Colin Firth and “Diary” director Sharon Maguire, the franchise is back to its hilarious, slapstick roots. 


Although Hugh Grant is not in the third installment (apparently he “didn’t think the script completely worked”), newcomer Dempsey does a great job rivaling fan-favorite Firth in the movie, which finds Bridget pregnant and unsure of who the father is. Dempsey plays Jack Qwant, the charming founder of an online dating site whom Bridget meets at a music festival. Firth revives his role as Bridget’s longtime love, Mark Darcy, who still has feelings for his quirky, lovable ex despite their up-and-down history. Both guys are good men, trying to do the right thing ― the opposite of the previous iterations, which saw Grant’s character, playboy Daniel Cleaver, always letting Bridget down. 


In this film, we see a confident Bridget ― no longer hyper-focused on her weight and appearance.


“I never thought she had a weight issue,” Zellweger told “Today” when discussing the idea that the character reached her “ideal weight.” “But I had long conversations with Sharon Maguire, the director, about that and she said, ‘No, in deciding how we show that she’s evolved, let’s have her have that one thing, that one thing that she’s always obsessed about, that she’s always presumed was the golden ticket to her happiness and let it have no bearing on her life at all.’ And I kind of liked the message in that.”


But although she’s more comfortable in her own skin, in this movie, Bridget is still tackling her work life, friendships, family drama and heartbreak, all while trying to prepare for motherhood without knowing which man is her baby’s daddy. So yes, Ms. Jones (and her thought bubbles and wacky wardrobe) are back in full effect.





One of the best scenes comes at the end of “Baby,” when, after months of contemplating who the father is, Bridget’s water breaks. Both men try to get her to the hospital in the best way they know how: by carrying her down the streets of London.


“That was one of my favorite sequences in the movie,” Dempsey said on Build. 


“I carry a baby quite a bit in this film and that gets really heavy after 10 hours, I can’t imagine carrying me for two or three days,” Zellweger added of the prosthetic baby bump she had to wear, which Dempsey said “must have been 60 pounds of just all plastic.” 


Aside from fake bumps, we see familiar faces, new faces, Ed Sheeran and a whole lot of comedy. All in all, “Baby” truly embraces the rom-com way while bringing Bridget Jones ― and all her perfect insecurities ― back to life. 


“It’s sort of a coming-of-age story for people at a different stage of their lives,” Zellweger said. “It subverts the myth that you’re supposed to have it all together by a certain time in your life. It’s just not true. We’re always kids trying to figure it out.”


And, if you still care at all about Daniel Cleaver, Grant shared his take on “Bridget 3” with Bustle, admitting, “There’s some very funny stuff in it.”


Yup, and some of it involves him ...







“Bridget Jones’s Baby” hits theaters on Friday. 


 


Watch the full AOL Build interview with Zellweger and Dempsey below. 




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Jay Z Calls The War On Drugs An 'Epic Fail' That Targets Black Americans

$
0
0



Hip-hop artist and business mogul Jay Z narrates a new video that traces the history of the war on drugs and highlights the way that it has disproportionately targeted black Americans.


“Rates of drug use are as high as they were when Nixon declared this so-called war in 1971,” he says in the video published by The New York Times on Thursday. “Forty-five years later, it’s time to rethink our policies and laws. The war on drugs is an epic fail.”


The video, which features illustrations by New York artist Molly Crabapple, begins by looking at how former Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan focused on drugs instead of larger social issues affecting cities. 


“No one wanted to talk about Reaganomics and the ending of social safety nets. The defunding of schools and the loss of jobs in cities across America,” says Jay Z, who has previously spoken about about dealing drugs as a teenager. “Young men like me who hustled became the sole villain and drug addicts lacked moral fortitude.”


The video goes on to highlight the way that a federal distinction between powder and crack cocaine unfairly targeted black Americans and how the adoption of mandatory sentencing laws caused the prison population to soar.


Then the Feds made distinctions between people who sold powder cocaine and crack cocaine — even though they were the same drug. Only difference is how you take it,” Jay Z says. “And even though white people used and sold crack more than black people, somehow it was black people who went to prison. The media ignored actual data. To this day, crack is still talked about as a black problem.”


“The war on drugs exploded the U.S. prison population, disproportionately locking away black and Latinos,” he continues. “Our prison population grew more than 900 percent. When the war on drugs began in 1971, our prison population was 200,000; today it is over 2 million.”


President Barack Obama has called for an overhaul of mandatory sentences for drug offenders and in August commuted the sentences of 214 federal prisoners incarcerated on drug charges.


Politicians have talked about needing to treat addiction more humanely, but they typically don’t use the same language when referring to drug dealers, the video says. No politician may illustrate this better than Maine Gov. Paul LePage (R), who has claimed that “guys with the name D-Money, Smoothie, Shifty” were coming to his state to deal drugs and impregnate white women. He has urged residents in his state to shoot drug dealers.


The war on drugs lives on. More than 80 percent of the 1.5 million drug-related arrests in 2014 were for possession, and half were for marijuana, Jay Z says. In New York, where you can no longer be arrested for having marijuana, citations for possession in black and Latino neighborhoods are more common than they are in white ones.


“Kids in Crown Heights are constantly stopped and ticketed for trees. Kids at dorms in Columbia, where rates of marijuana use are equal to or worse than those in the hood, are never targeted or ticketed,” he says.


There are also still racial disparities within the legal marijuana industry, a BuzzFeed investigation pointed out in March. Felony drug convictions have prevented many black Americans from opening licensed dispensaries. Although there are no official statistics on ownership of storefront marijuana dispensaries, BuzzFeed estimated that about 1 percent of them are owned by black people. The industry is expected to be worth $50 billion in 10 years.


The New York Times’ video was the result of a collaboration between Revolve Impact, a social impact agency, and the Drug Policy Alliance. Dream Hampton, the co-author of Jay Z’s book, Decoded, approached the alliance last year about doing a project to highlight how white people were poised to profit off of drugs when black Americans had long been targeted for possessing them.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

16 Award-Nominated Books From 2016 Your Shelf Can't Be Without

$
0
0

It’s the most wonderful time of the year: There’s the faintest hint of a snap in the air ― or the promise of one soon, at least ― coffee shops are breaking out their autumn seasonal beverages, and we’re all feeling the vague urge to shop for fresh notebooks and pens.


Best of all, book award long- and shortlists are popping off all over, and we are basking in it.


Today, the National Book Foundation released their 2016 National Book Award for Fiction longlist ― earlier this week they also released longlists for the awards in Nonfiction, Poetry, and Young People’s Literature. On Tuesday, the Man Booker Prize announced the shortlist, winnowed down from its previously released longlist, for the 2016 prize, awarded to an original novel written in English and published in the U.K.


Both lists feature a diverse range of literary talent ― suffice it to say that we’ll be rushing out to devour those books on the lists that we haven’t managed to read as of yet. The nominated books HuffPost Culture writers have read and reviewed this year to date, however, we found compelling, elegantly written, and thought-provoking. 


Check out the full lists below ― we’ve spotlighted the listed books we’ve read and loved ― and see which award-worthy books you haven’t added to your bookshelves yet:


National Book Award Longlist



Colson Whitehead, The Underground Railroad (Doubleday)


From our review: “In the journey of Cora, one determined and ingenious yet all-too-vulnerable woman, The Underground Railroad doesn’t present simply one journey from slave to free, one escape, one life of torment. This isn’t a neat narrative with a winning white savior or an indomitable black escapee at its heart; it resists optimism and a comfortable conclusion. Instead, Whitehead layers in racial injustices and atrocities typical of different times and places, and in doing so reveals the full range of how such crimes can be perpetrated.”



Jacqueline Woodson, Another Brooklyn (Amistad)


From our review: “With warm, gleaming, gem-like sentences, Woodson captures the rare treasures of girlhood friendships, but the book contends with so much else, and the taut plot balloons with tension as August grows to understand a tragic realization about her family, one that will shape her for decades after. [...] If she writes honestly and valiantly about racism, a force that looms large over America, she writes even more evocatively about grief, another noxiously universal experience.”



Karan Mahajan, The Association of Small Bombs (Viking)


From our review: “A psychologically intimate and stylistically compelling examination of the ripple effects of small acts of terrorism, Mahajan’s second novel shouldn’t be missed. [...] Mahajan makes the humanity, the psychological unraveling or misplaced idealism or confusion, of each person in his novel more tangible than any news item ever could.”



Elizabeth McKenzie, The Portable Veblen (Penguin Press)


From our review: “The [...] domestic scenes — interspersed with chapters devoted to the jargon-heavy world of pharmaceutical trials and the equally esoteric musings of Thorstein Veblen — accurately and funnily capture the complexities of modern families, made knotty by the work we’re encouraged to do in our individual lives. Think The Corrections meets The Wallcreeper — where the warring wants of career-centric success and familial harmony converge, tension and comedy emerge.”



Adam Haslett, Imagine Me Gone (Little, Brown)


From our review: “An ambitious book about music, anxiety, and a family determined to stick together after fracturing loss, Imagine Me Gone is proof that realistic stories have immense power.” 


More awesome reads from the National Book Award 2016 Fiction Longlist:



Brad Watson, Miss Jane (W.W. Norton & Co.)


Lydia Millet, Sweet Lamb of Heaven (W.W. Norton & Co.)


Paulette Jiles, News of the World (William Morrow)


Garth Greenwell, What Belongs to You (Farrar, Straus and Giroux)


Chris Bachelder, The Throwback Special (W.W. Norton & Co.)


Man Booker Prize Shortlist



Paul Beatty, The Sellout (Oneworld)


From our review: “Beatty is at his best when parodying attempts to correct racial prejudices from within the ivory tower. [...] The Sellout is a hilarious, pop-culture-packed satire about race in America. Beatty writes energetically, providing insight as often as he elicits laughs.”



Ottessa Moshfegh, Eileen (Jonathan Cape)


From our review: “[Moshfegh] plumbs the depths of violence people can visit upon their children, and the impossibility of inflicting revenge or even defense upon one’s parents. Without totally disappearing, Eileen is shackled forever to her vicious father, a servant to society’s expectations of filial duty. Finally, that image endures as the success of this debut: a girl who isn’t an object of desire or even particularly appealing, but who aches to be seen and loved; a kid who is decidedly not all right.”


More awesome reads from the Man Booker Prize 2016 Shortlist:



Deborah Levy, Hot Milk (Hamish Hamilton)


Graeme Macrae Burnet, His Bloody Project (Contraband)


David Szalay, All That Man Is (Jonathan Cape)


Madeleine Thien, Do Not Say We Have Nothing (Granta Books)

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Everglades Are More Out-Of-This-World Gorgeous Than You Thought

$
0
0

Florida is known as the place where shuttles launched into space. But the view from the ground is pretty nifty, too.


Mark Andrew Thomas is a Florida-based wildlife photographer who grew up near the Everglades, a tropical wilderness of varied ecosystems fed by a slow-moving “river of grass” some 60 miles wide. His latest project is a lineup of crystal-clear images that make his surrogate backyard look downright otherworldly. 


Everglades National Park is known as an especially stellar spot for stargazing, thanks to its distance from city lights and superbly dark sky. Turns out it’s also a great place to unplug.


“It’s the place where I feel the most centered, the place I go to when life’s stresses and problems seem overwhelming,” Thomas wrote in a description of his photos. “It’s where I go to think and decompress.”


We’d feel pretty calm here, too.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


How 'Loving' Tells The Quiet Story Of A Monumental Supreme Court Case About Interracial Marriage

$
0
0

In 1958, a white construction worker and his pregnant black girlfriend traveled to Washington, D.C., where they could be legally wed. After returning to rural Virginia, police raided their home. The marriage license hanging on the wall was cause for arrest. A legal battle ensued, all while the couple tried to evade the police and live in peace.


Richard and Mildred Loving’s case, filed by the ACLU and heard by the Supreme Court, ultimately overturned bans on interracial marriage. In 2011, Nancy Buirski made a documentary about the proceedings. That inspired “Take Shelter” and Midnight Special” director Jeff Nichols to craft a feature film, not about the case itself, but about the reserved couple at its center, the ones who never sought to be heroes.


Having screened at the Toronto Film Festival this week following its Cannes premiere in May, “Loving” is a remarkable character study. Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga play Richard and Mildred, operating off of a delicate script, written by Nichols, that doesn’t require a showy proclamation to graft its emotional center. It also, of course, has a brief appearance from Michael Shannon, who has been in each of Nichols’ films. 


“Loving” will make a viable play for Oscars in the coming months. It wrecked me. I sobbed through the final half hour and emerged from the screening worried my face was too splotchy for the streets of Toronto. I can’t wait for the world to have this movie in its hands on Nov. 4, especially after this conversation with Nichols about his approach to the story.


When “Loving” was first announced, I remember thinking there’s no way Jeff Nichols is directing a historical biopic. It seems so unlike what we know of your work, at least until you actually see the movie. Did you receive similar responses while developing the project?


No, from that standpoint, everybody was pretty excited. We still had to navigate and find the right financier and all that, but that’s more an equation of dollars and the variables of the project. Honestly, there was a bit of a personal process on my part of “How do I fit into this story?” and “Why is it right for me?” Those questions started to get answered very quickly, though, when I started to watch the documentary.  


A lot of people attribute the pace of this film and the aesthetic of the film to the way that I make movies. That’s flattering, but it’s also a little limiting because I feel like the pace of this film, and the true nature of it, is dedicated to Richard and Mildred. It represents who they were. I think the fortunate part is that falls very neatly into my wheelhouse as a filmmaker.


But that being said, I remember thinking, much like you were thinking, that this would be the most conventional film I had made. And I was sitting in the editing room with my editor, and I was like, “Ya know, this thing really doesn’t have a climax in any traditional sense.” There is no three-act structure at work here. I never work along those lines anyway, narratively. I just find it too limiting. Now, there is an emotional climax. That’s just something I try to put in all my films. But by the time it was all said and done, I kind of stood back and said, “Well, I’ve gone and made another film that was not conventional.” I’d like to think it’s just what the story needed to be. It’s what Richard and Mildred demanded of it.



We don’t see the actual Supreme Court hearing, so the film ends rather quietly, considering how towering the results were. Did you ever think of giving us some galvanizing, rah-rah moment?


No, I picked up on that right from the start in the documentary. There’s this amazing scene where [lawyer Bernie Cohen] is recounting the victory. It’s really joyous. It’s hard to watch and not feel an exuberance with him as he’s recounting it. But then Nancy Buirski, who made the documentary, is offscreen and says, “So, how did you tell the Lovings?” And he says, “Oh, I think we called them on the phone.” And that just struck me right to the core. What was that phone call like? Which obviously becomes an important, very quiet scene in the film ― one of these things that feels like an ordinary thing: You pick up the phone and your life is changed. But that’s what the Lovings felt like, these very ordinary moments that had extraordinary consequences.


When I first talked to the producers ― this was back in 2012 ― we weren’t far off the heels of “The Help” making $200 million and being what it was. I told them, “Guys, there’s a feel-good movie in here that could probably make a lot of money, and I’m probably not going to make that film.” So as much as I was surprised on the back end by the fact that it wasn’t as conventional as I thought it might be, there was an element on the front end of saying, “I know for a fact, though, just by benefit of sticking to the point of view of the Lovings, of not going the route of the court case, this is going to counter what I think might be financially responsible for a story like this.”


So you’re saying you aimed to make the antithesis of “The Help.”


[Smiles] I’ll let you say that. I did not say that. That is your quote, not mine. No, I wanted to make a film that represented its people. [Nichols pauses, then chuckles.] In order to do that, it’s kind of like a sweater with a loose thread, meaning the court case. The more you start to pull it, the more it unravels, and you need to incorporate that in the film. So it was very important to really have this narrative temperance when it came to the Lovings’ point of view.


We were really lucky ― Martin Scorsese was a friend of the project because he was a friend of the documentary filmmaker. I got to speak to him about the script. There was a question: Should we play up the lawyers a little bit more? He was like, “No, no, no, it’s very delicate.” And I kind of took that as permission to stick to my guns. You saw that note coming, and it was really nice to hear from him that, no, the balance of this was correct.


In what fashion does Scorsese give notes on another director’s script?


It was a pretty brief phone call where I’m just fumbling over myself and trying to listen. I remember I was trying to bring up some of the other producers’ points, and he just kind of kept saying, “No, you’ve really done a nice job with this ― don’t mess with it.” It was a pretty short, simple conversation.



Would you agree that you are drawn to small movies about big topics? “Take Shelter” is about apocalyptic visions, “Mud” is about children without parents, “Midnight Special” is about supernatural paranoia, “Loving” is about a landmark legal case. 


Yeah, I think that makes sense. I actually don’t think the movies are that small. They feel odd, and they feel oddly placed. We are used to seeing stories told a certain way, and for whatever reason, I don’t tell narratives that way. A lot of people don’t like that. A lot of people watch my films and say, “He’s missing something” or “That’s not a satisfying way to receive the story.” That’s their prerogative. But it’s just in my nature to lay out narratives as I see the characters needing them to lay out. So many people think about plot.  I’m really just thinking about character behavior, and I’m letting that lead the narrative. 


Regardless, and this gets to the heart of your question, I really want there to be an emotional conveyance to the audience. I want them to be affected by these things. Each film that I’ve made, there’s specifically one scene that I can point to, and it’s a pressure point. If you’re not there with me, I haven’t done my job, or you’re not paying attention, or some sort of combination of the two, and this is where you’re going to feel it. That’s more important to me than some plot twist or contrivance. I just want people to feel things, and in order to do that, they have to identify with the characters.


How did you arrive at that scene here, knowing it would have to come from the Lovings, who opted not to attend the Supreme Court hearings?


The back half of the film was a real question mark for me. In the documentary, the back third of the film downshifts into the court case, as it should. And it’s fascinating. But since I made such a strict decision to stick to their point of view, I wanted to see their lives in hiding.


There’s not a lot of information about that time period. I’m sure there were more harrowing details that happened to them that I’m just not aware of, but I didn’t want to contrive things, so I really focused on the psychological threat that they had to be living under in hiding during this period in this very dangerous place. I read this quote from Mildred before she passed away that’s at the end of the film: “I miss him. He took care of me.” It seemed like such a beautiful thing to say because if you really look at their relationship, and if you look at the fact that Mildred is the more active of the two characters in terms of getting the case in front of the Supreme Court, ultimately, she is the active character. But she says he took care of her. I think Richard ― and this speaks to the cult of domesticity in that period ― felt an obligation to take care of and provide for his family, like so many people do. He was emasculated in that effort. He was not allowed to do that. I thought how frustrating that must have been for a man like that and how heartbreaking that must have been.


You see that it’s not just about “he can take care of her” ― it’s about “they take care of each other.” What a beautiful idea. As soon as I had that quote at the end and that moment there in the back third of the film [where Richard tells Mildred he can take care of her], I felt like I had something. 


I don’t think we see Richard and Mildred say the words “I love you” to each other. Then there’s that scene on the porch ― and this isn’t a spoiler, since it’s in the trailer ― where Richard says to the lawyer, “You tell the judge I love my wife.” There is such power in that because of the muted affection they display. How conscious were you in building to that moment?


It was not a conscious effort. There wasn’t a “love” removal pass on the script. But I’m married. I’m seven years in. When you start to add time, you start to understand where the real love comes from, and it’s not from platitudes. Everybody needs to hear it. I tell my wife I love her all the time. But it really comes from these examples of love, these demonstrations of love in very small moments.


I think marriage is a lot about commitment, and they very much had the opportunity to just divorce one another and quote-unquote solve this problem. They made a conscious choice not to. They made a conscious choice to stay committed to each other through this process. That was the ultimate thing. I guess as I was laying out scenes, there was an innate approach to what I would consider the real examples of “I love you,” which are these smaller ones. To just have them say it, maybe that’s not good enough for the audience, and maybe not fair enough of a representation of how they felt about each other. And then you have the fact that it’s Richard Loving. That guy probably doesn’t walk around saying “I love you” a lot, even though he feels it.


Just a couple of days ago, it was announced that you’re directing a reboot of “Alien Nation” for Fox. Given all this talk of small movies, how comfortable do you feel stepping into the territory of a blockbuster-ish remake?


My hope is it goes back to your first question about when you first heard about “Loving.” The hope is you will feel the same way about that. But that project is in its infancy, so TBD.


“Loving” opens in theaters on Nov. 4. This interview has been edited and condensed. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Products You Need To Look Like You 'Woke Up Like This'

$
0
0

Wanna look flawless? These are the products you need.







The man behind all of Beyoncé’s epic Lemonade looks, makeup artist Sir John, held a Master Class in NYC on September 14 and gave insiders a laundry list of his favorite products ― personal and professional ― throughout the six-hour discussion.



Here’s a breakdown by category:


Face: What he calls the “best translucent powder in the business,” Sir John swears by Make Up For Ever HD Microfinish Powder to set your makeup. He also says Milk of Magnesia (yes, the laxative) is the key to a matte face. Glue sticks are the secret for taming and texturizing brows. For complexion and contouring, he loves L’Oreal’s Pro Glow Foundation, Givenchy Mister Light and Tom Ford Bronzing Powder



Lips: For a great matte lip that’ll last, Sir John thinks Dose of Colors Liquid Lipstick is the way to go. The L’Oreal Plum Lip Palette he personally created is in his top rotation and he’s “emotionally attached to it.” Charlotte Tilbury’s Nude Kate is also “the perfect nude.”


Skincare: Sir John mentioned his obsession with rose oil no less than ten times throughout the class, his favorite being Chantecaille Face Oil. He also told The Huffington Post that he uses Ren Glycol Lactic Radiance Renewal Mask to keep his complexion in check and By Terry Rose Balm to feel “luxurious.”


Eyes: MAC 224 Tapered Blending Brush is the perfect “fluffy synthetic brush that diffuses concealer” around the eyes best ― it helps make smoky eyes have invisible lines. For Beyoncé’s “On The Run” tour, Sir John did a winged eye with only brown under the eyes so Beyonce didn’t look older than she is. He loves the matte brown shadow, Coconut Grove, from Nars for this.



In creating the above holographic eye look at the class, he used Dose of Colors Eyedeal Duo in Stellar and topped it with Elizabeth Arden Eight-Hour Cream to give it an ethereal gleam.


Highlighters: He feels that “cream highlighters are the best.” Specifically, Madina from Milano Chic & Shine is the “best in the business,” but Kiko Radiant Touch highlighter is produced by the same company and also great. It gives a sheen that’s more “natural” than a powder highlighter.


 Now, get shopping! 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Queen Sugar' Author Wants More Diverse Stories About Black People

$
0
0

Two and a half years after Queen Sugar was published, everyone is talking about Natalie Baszile’s debut novel.


“Selma” director Ava DuVernay’s screen adaptation of the book premiered last week on OWN with a two-hour special. When I spoke to Baszile the week before the premiere, she hadn’t yet seen anything of the finished television series, also titled “Queen Sugar,” except trailers.


“I am excited [to watch it],” she said of DuVernay’s work. “From what I have seen of the trailers, from what I have seen of the script that I’ve read ... I think we have a similar intention, we have a similar goal, long-term, for delivering something to audiences ... that is something different.”


“That is my firm belief,” she added, “that all people, but especially African-American viewers and readers, deserve something a little bit different than what is out there.” 


With diversity of representation in film, TV and literature a particular point of heated debate right now, Baszile’s words strike a chord. But her point, she makes clear, goes beyond the easy, superficial question of simply ensuring a modicum of black representation in entertainment. “I really came to literature during the reawakening, the second wave renaissance of literature during the late ‘80s and early ‘90s,” she told me. “Toni Morrison published Beloved, she published Jazz. You had Toni Cade Bambara publishing, you had Alice Walker publishing.”


But then, she noticed, something happened.



All people, but especially African-American viewers and readers, deserve something a little bit different than what is out there.
Natalie Baszile


“As I started to write Queen Sugar, especially in the late ‘90s ... all of these great diverse stories that I had grown up on and was inspired by, started to disappear. All of a sudden you saw a very, very narrow portrayal of the African-American experience on the bookshelf. All of a sudden the only thing you saw were titles like The Bitch Is Back or Stackin’ Paper, and there’d be a picture of a woman, scantily clad, on the hood of a car.”


“I’m not saying those books don’t have a place,” she hastened to add, “because they do. But they didn’t reflect my experience, and they did not reflect the experience of so many African-Americans I knew who were my contemporaries.”



Against a backdrop of what Baszile perceived to be a one-note portrayal of black life in American literature, she told me, “I really felt almost like it was my duty as a writer ... to write books with whole African-Americans, balanced people ― yes they had challenges, yes, they were facing obstacles, but they weren’t broken in the same way that other characters I saw out there were broken.”


In the TV adaptation of “Queen Sugar,” the portrayal isn’t always the same as the picture painted in Baszile’s book. The novel tells the story of Charley, a financially strapped, widowed art teacher from Los Angeles with a young daughter named Micah. Her wealthy, real estate mogul father dies, leaving her with a shocking legacy: a sugar cane plantation in Louisiana, where he grew up. Her half-brother, Ralph Angel, a single father who dotes on his son Blue but resorts to crime in supporting him, heads back home not because he received an inheritance, but because he has no other hope left.



I really felt almost like it was my duty as a writer ... to write books with whole African-Americans, balanced people.
Natalie Baszile


In DuVernay’s story, Charley is living the high life as the wife and business partner of a famous NBA star; Micah is their teenage son. She flees to Louisiana, where her father lives on a sugar cane plantation, when video evidence suggests her husband was involved in the gang rape of an incapacitated woman involving other members of the team. When her father dies, everything changes yet again.


I asked Baszile about the TV special’s revisions, many of which are significant and some of which seem rather charged, like transforming Charley’s husband into an alleged rapist ― and she was circumspect. “[DuVernay] gave me a heads up about a lot of those changes,” she told me. “Many, actually, most of the changes she made, I agreed with. Readers come to literary fiction with a different eye, and a different set of expectations, and this was the world of film and television. It was glitzier, it was more glamorous, it was shinier.


“I think Ava has made some strategic narrative choices that will allow her to continue the conversation I started in the book, themes that were very, very important to me in all the years that it took me to write the book.”


Here are some more eloquent thoughts Baszile on her love for Louisiana, the strength found in multigenerational family love, the importance of Black Lives Matter, and other themes excavated in “Queen Sugar”: 



On why she chose to write about the South:


“While the book is not strictly autobiographical ― in the sense that I’ve never farmed sugar cane, I’ve never actually lived in Louisiana ― my dad was born in Louisiana and raised there. And most of my family on my dad’s side still lives in Louisiana. When I did start to discover Louisiana on my own, it was as a young adult. It was when my dad would return once a year in the spring, to visit his family and take his mother on a road trip. I started to tag along. My first introduction to Louisiana came when I was in my late teens and early 20s.


“The place was so different from what I knew growing up in the suburbs of Los Angeles that I was kind of just mesmerized by it and really drawn in.”


On the culture of Louisiana:


“The relationship that people in Louisiana have to the land is totally different to my experience growing up and living in in urban and suburban areas. I’d never met people who hunted and fished and literally ate what they caught, like, for real. People live their lives according to what season it is. It’s duck-hunting season, or it’s quail season, or it’s deer season ― it’s fascinating to me. And that’s not just white Southerners, that’s black people too. I’d never seen a black cowboy, but they’re there. They have their horses, and they have their land. You had black people from all over South Louisiana who would get together for these things called zydeco trail rides, where there were literally like 500 black cowboys fully decked out in the gear on horseback. Have you ever seen that? it was mind-blowing. To see all these aspects of Louisiana culture and the way it overlapped with race and class, it was like a goldmine. 


“Honestly, had I not already been laboring over this book for 11 years and had Oprah and Ava not come calling, I’d probably still be writing that book in order to incorporate all of the stuff that I witnessed and experienced.”


On Louisiana’s complex racial dynamics:


“When I would go down to Louisiana to do research for the book, one of the surprising things to me was all of the subtle and not-so-subtle ways that race plays out in the South. Because I was an outsider, because I went down there with a certain sense of freedom, I could observe a lot of those dynamics from the outside. It’s not that I went down there and was totally naive about the South, but because I had not grown up in that, I didn’t feel the weight of those dynamics. I was going anywhere I wanted to. I was doing what I needed to do. And many of the first people I met were white.


“It was a very, very strange experience to go down to the deep South, Louisiana, to have many of my initial guides be white. For me to be a black woman, keenly aware of what was going on, and to also be connecting to the black people down there. Some of the farmers, people in their 70s, 80s, from my dad’s generation, who grew up in the segregated South, who were happy for me, but also baffled by me, but also intensely proud.


“I remember being at this party once, and all of the help was black, and my husband and I were the only black people at this event. I had a very strong connection with the people at the party but also the help. It was this surreal experience to be there and experience race and class and gender simultaneously, to be an insider but also to be an outsider.”


On the challenges of writing about race in the South:


“As much as I wanted to write a Southern story, I was not at all interested in writing a story that was all moonlight and magnolias. I was not interested in some syrupy sweet narrative where everyone’s getting along. I wanted it to be complicated. I wanted it to be difficult. I wanted to celebrate everything about South Louisiana that is beautiful and welcoming but I also wanted it to explore and acknowledge the ugly side, because Louisiana has an ugly side.”



On the vital importance of mother-daughter and father-son relationships:


“I have daughters. Two daughters. I am intimately familiar with the joys and the challenges of raising girls. [Writing about] that came very naturally to me.


“I love that multi-generational story. That is an experience that I wish I would have had more of. I didn’t grow up around a vast extended family, because we were out here in California, and my dad’s people were in Louisiana and my mom’s family was in Detroit and the Midwest.


“The experience I had when I went back as a young adult and spent time with my grandmother and my aunt, and what that was like, and really had to learn, as Charley learns in the book, what it means to have to respect your elders ― that’s steeped in Southern tradition, that is something that has always been part of African-American tradition. That’s an American experience that I think people are losing. So I really wanted to explore that in the book. What is it like to be a grown woman to then have to defer to your grandmother? 


“As far as Ralph Angel and Blue ― black men don’t always get a fair shake in their portrayal. So as flawed as Ralph Angel is in the book, and he is very flawed, I also wanted to give him dimensions, and show a character, a black man, who is really trying to do his best, and who if nothing else was going try to protect his child. That something I hadn’t seen in a lot of books I was reading where there were black characters. They were out there, but it wasn’t a common theme. So I really wanted to try to explore that and present that as an option for readers.”


On trying to run a sugar cane plantation in the deep South as a black woman:


“I imagine Charley as being deeply troubled, deeply ambivalent about her role, because she comes down there ― she doesn’t know anything. Her experience in California as I imagined it is very much like my mine, more an experience of integration and inclusion. So when she goes down to Louisiana, she has to confront that dark history. She wants to be a good employer, but then again she’s caught, because as, in the book, Prosper Denton tells her, ‘Black folks would rather work for a white man.’ That is a historical fact, not that black people felt exploited or suspicious of other black people, but that gets into that grey area, of who should be in a position of authority? Who’s getting ahead and who can be trusted?


“My dad, who was from Louisiana, used to have a saying, and it was something like, ‘Folks always believe the white man’s ice is colder.’ It speaks to this dynamic about the ambivalence, I think, that black people felt, maybe not now, but somehow the white man is going to treat you better, even when you know that that’s not true. There’s this belief that somehow, that is going to be the case, and it goes against everything you know ― and yet.” 


On Black Lives Matter:


“Queen Sugar took me 11 years to write. In that time, really, we were at the very beginning of this whole movement. There was Trayvon Martin. There was Oscar Grant. And I think that was it. I was thinking about that, that was definitely on my mind, when I was thinking about Ralph Angel’s character and what happens to him in the book. That sense of almost inevitability, and what is his motivation in doing the things that he does in the book. When he has those brushes with the police officer, the state patroller, what is that like for him? That was very much on my mind. But the culture had not exploded the way it has since I sold the manuscript and the book came out in hardcover in 2014.


“It was definitely an issue I wanted to address in the book in a way that was unapologetic and heartbreaking. Because I was heartbroken. It was very important to me.


“Could I have predicted it would have become one of the defining cultural questions of our time? No. But it was on my mind, and one of the things that I’m both curious about and excited about in the [TV] series is, how are they going to deal with that? I know that they are. What are they going to say? How are they going to explore the issue, in a way that’s subtle, in a way that’s nuanced and complicated, and doesn’t let the characters off the hook but doesn’t let the viewers off the hook, white and black?” 


This interview has been condensed and edited. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Bold Poetry Curriculum Changing LA’s Youth Literacy Problem

$
0
0


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Wasfia Nazreen Climbed The World's Highest Mountains To Prove How Powerful Women Can Be

$
0
0



On Nov. 18, 2015, a woman named Wasfia Nazreen climbed to the top of Carstensz Pyramid, located in the western central highlands of the Papua Province in Indonesia.


By reaching the summit, she not only scaled the highest mountain on the continent of Australia, she became the first Bangladeshi to climb all of the seven summits, the highest peaks on each continent of planet Earth. And she did so, as she explains in a short film named for her, to prove to the world how far women from Bangladesh have come.



Wasfia” is a 11-minute documentary, directed by Sean Kusanagi in association with RYOT Films, that celebrates the accomplishments of Nazreen, the activist and mountaineer who uses sports diplomacy to bring awareness to issues like sustainability, indigenous culture and women’s rights around the globe. She dedicated her treks to the tops of Mount Kilimanjaro (Africa), Denali (North America), Mount Elbrus (Europe), Aconcagua (South America), Carstensz Pyramid, Vinson (Antarctica) and Mount Everest (Asia) to the women of Bangladesh in particular.


Initially, Nazreen endeavored to empower women closer to sea level. Growing up in Bangladesh, she was aware of the fact that women in her country face one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the region, and that more than half of married Bangladeshi women ages 15 to 49 reported experiences of physical or sexual violence from their husbands, including dowry-related violence. She was aware of the fact that Bangladeshi women were making strides in education and the workplace, but were still steps away from full gender equality.


In college, Nazreen began to pursue a life devoted to helping women succeed. She first studied in India, working with women and refugees who used art therapy to cope with trauma. Later, she worked with groups like the international humanitarian aid group CARE, to educate and train women born or wrongfully forced into the sex industry in Bangladesh.



But when foreign funding became scarce, she found herself in need of a new way to attract attention and support for the causes she cared about. So Nazreen, who’d been climbing since 2006, created the Bangladesh on Seven Summits foundation in 2011, the overarching organization that helped her move from peak to peak, striving to scale the rest of the world’s most famous mountains just in time for the 40th anniversary of Bangladeshi independence.


The media attention she received in response to her climbing feats eventually helped her to launch the Ösel Foundation in 2016, an educational institute set in the outdoors. At the Ösel Foundation, Nazreen uses backpacking, camping, trekking, climbing, and other activities in nature to empower young women to identify the “mountains” in their lives and climb them.



“Even as a child, I had this really strong feeling that I needed to set myself free, and that no one else could do it for me,” Nazreen says in “Wasfia.” Having grown up “like an orphan,” she brought this sentiment to climbing, finding strength in the face of those who doubted her skills. Today, she hopes to impart that strength upon the young women she teaches.


The documentary, currently touring the U.S. and featured exclusively in full above, was shot entirely on an iPhone 6s by director Kusanagi. It follows Nazreen as she explains what drives her to climb another mountain and how she hopes to live as a role model for the people of her young country.



One of my favorite parts of making this film was being able to, even if just for a moment, walk in the shoes of someone as compassionate, driven and trusting as Wasfia,” he explained in a statement. “The way Wasfia talks about summiting a mountain more as a ‘surrender than conquering’ is a reminder that telling a beautiful story is often similar: It requires us to listen, ask questions and surrender.”


You can see stills from the short film ― all shot on an iPhone ― below. To learn more about Nazreen’s initiative, visit the Ösel Foundation website here.













Editor’s Note: RYOT Films is a part of The Huffington Post.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596344.js" async> </script>