Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

What Life Is Like When You Have A Dog, In 5 Comics

$
0
0

Having a dog is simultaneously one of the most rewarding and most challenging things you can do as a homeowner.


Along with all those snuggles, smiles and laughs comes a load of extra work, like cleaning up messes and making sure your pup is cared for while you're away. But oh, how worthwhile it is. If you're a dog owner, these comics from Adrienne Hedger of Hedger Humor will ring all too true:


1.



2. 



3. 



4. 



5. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


23 Beautiful Tattooed Brides Who Wouldn't Dream Of Covering Their Ink

$
0
0

Grandma might have told you to cover up your tattoos for the wedding. We say, "No way!"


Below, 23 inked-up brides who showed off their tats and looked totally gorgeous doing so.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Winning Shots From This Drone Photography Contest Will Blow Your Mind

$
0
0

Flying high above the ground and operated remotely, drones can be used for military engagements, surveillance purposes -- and taking extraordinary photographs.


Many people use drones to capture remarkable images from locations that lie beyond their physical reach. Aerial photographers from around the globe submitted more than 6,000 pictures to the third annual Dronestagram contest, an international competition supported by National Geographic. 


After careful consideration, judges selected winners for three photography categories: Travel; Nature and Wildlife; and Sports and Adventure.


Max Seigal, the photographer who shot the above image of the climber in Moab, Utah, said using a drone has enabled him to take photos that would have otherwise been impossible to capture.


"Two years ago I started flying drones, and I quickly realized their potential to capture stunning, never-before-seen views," he explained. "I've been hooked ever since!"


Check out the other incredible winning shots from this year's Dronestagram competition:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The New Iron Man Is A Black Teenaged Girl, And She Slays

$
0
0

There's a new Iron Man in town, and she's a black girl. 


Marvel Comics announced today that at the end of the run of their current comic book series "Civil War II," Tony Stark will step down from his role as the iconic super hero, and a new character named Riri Williams will emerge as his successor. 


Riri is brilliant -- a scientific prodigy enrolled at MIT at the age of 15. She gets on Stark's radar after she manages to build her own fully functioning Iron Man armor. She also looks like a total badass. On the cover of the next "Invincible Iron Man," Riri is featured rocking an amazing fro and holding the iconic Iron Man helmet:



Williams is one of several new characters at Marvel taking on the mantles of beloved heroes, including Miles Morales (the first black Spider-Man), Kamala Khan (a Muslim-American super hero), and Jane Foster (the first female Thor). 


Brian Michael Bendis, who is also responsible for creation of Jessica Jones, and Miles Morales, conceived of the Riri Williams character as a young woman who decides to become a hero in response to the tragic street violence she experiences growing up. Speaking exclusively to TIME on Wednesday, Bendis said that he hopes the inclusion of Williams will add to the recent wave of diversity within the Marvel Universe. 


“Talking to any of the older creators, it’s the thing they said they wish they’d done more of ― reflecting the world around them,” Bendis said.


“Now, when you have a young woman come up to you at a signing and say how happy she is to be represented in this universe, you know you’re moving in the right direction.”


It remains to be seen how the Riri Williams story arc will pan out, but judging by her badass pose on the cover of “Invincible Iron Man” alone, it’s sure to be awesome. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Duchess Of Cambridge's Off-The-Shoulder Dress Is Right On The Money

$
0
0

To quote the almighty Rihanna: Work, work, work, work, work. 


Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge presented the Art Fund’s Museum of the Year prize Wednesday at the Natural History Museum in London, where she mingled with guests, admired some photography, made walking steps in super high heels seem easy, and looked absolutely stunning. 



The former Kate Middleton stepped out of her comfort zone of repeat dressing in favor of a new off-the-shoulder, form-fitting cream dress by Barbara Casasola, a Brazilian designer based in London. She paired the look with a pair of $180 shoes by Brazilian brand Schutz that are already sold out on Shopbop.


Some of Kate’s followers (those who were not too busy swooning over this daring new look, anyway) wondered if perhaps the nod to two Brazilian designers hinted at potential plans to attend the Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro in August.



Others, like us, were too busy marveling at the fact that she was able to make movements like this... 



...without the dreaded shoulder ride-up that’s all too familiar to people who frequent this style of shirt or dress.


Keep doing what you’re doing, girlfriend.  


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Mom 'Shocked' By Response To Pic Of Toddler Pretending To Breastfeed

$
0
0

A mom’s viral rant is causing a stir among parents and breastfeeding activists.


When the mom’s 2-year-old daughter, Charlotte, pretended to breastfeed her doll in a store, she took a photo of the toddler and shared it on social media with several hashtags, including #normalizebreastfeeding and #nurseinpublic.


After the post received negative comments, the little girl’s mom sent her story to the popular Facebook page, Breastfeeding Mama Talk, which shared her response on Tuesday.





Breastfeeding Mama Talk’s post shows screenshots of the mom’s original post ― along with the response from one commenter, which refers to the photos as “some of the nastiest sh*t of my life” and suggests that the mom should be “punched in the damn face.”


In her caption for the screenshots, the mom says she was “shocked” and “blown away” to read negative messages. “Breastfeeding is something that is natural and IS normal,” she wrote, noting that she breastfeeds Charlotte but formula fed her now-5-year-old son Bentley and thinks both options are “equally wonderful.”


“A baby putting a bottle to its doll’s mouth, they are feeding their baby doll, correct?” she wrote. “There’s no difference.”


The mom added:



Charlotte also pretends to do her makeup, my son pretends to work on his vehicles and fix things from watching his father. Isn’t that how it is? Your child mimicking NORMAL daily behavior? Charlotte has never had a bottle, I was/am lucky enough to be able to have breastfed these last two years strictly from breast. I was just so taken back. I then questioned am I wrong? How can I or why should I tell her this is wrong when it is what she knows?



The Breastfeeding Mama Talk post received an overwhelmingly positive response, as many parents commented with photos of their own children pretending to nurse their dolls and stuffed animals.


And #NormalizeBreastfeeding prevails.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Scientists Just Validated Your Instagram Obsession

$
0
0

Documenting life with a camera can be a conflicting experience. On one hand, photographs make incredible mementos. On the other hand, there’s something to be said for simply enjoying an experience technology-free.


However, if you’re among those with a photography obsession, new research suggests that you might be onto something.


A study recently published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology found that stopping to take a picture may enhance certain experiences, making them more enjoyable for the picture-taker. 



During the study, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Southern California and Yale University observed over 2,000 participants engaging in nine different activities, which included eating lunch, watching a Rihanna concert, taking a virtual bus tour, doing arts and crafts and walking through a museum.


For each experiment, researchers instructed half of the group to take pictures of their experience, while the other half was instructed to go about the experience sans camera. After each activity, the group completed a questionnaire that measured their levels of enjoyment and engagement.


In nearly all of the settings, the researchers found that participants who took pictures enjoyed their experiences more than those who did not take photos.


“One critical factor that has been shown to affect enjoyment is the extent to which people are engaged with the experience,” the authors wrote in the study, adding that photo-taking naturally draws people into an experience. 


The study also showed that participants who took pictures were more attentive toward the subject of their photos.


During the museum experiment, for example, researchers gave participants eye-tracking glasses to track how long and how frequently participants looked at certain artifacts. The study found that those who took pictures were more fixated on the focal pieces of the museum exhibit.



Snapping the photo isn't the only element that enhanced experience. The researchers also found that even the act of planning to take a picture could increase enjoyment.


For example, when researchers asked participants in the virtual bus tour to simply think about what pictures they would have taken, they reported a higher sense of satisfaction.


So why do people who take pictures tend to enjoy their experiences more? According to the researchers, it's because they feel more engaged. 


“Unlike traditional dual-task situations that divide attention, capturing experiences with photos actually focuses attention onto the experience, particularly on aspects of the experience worth capturing,” the authors wrote.



Before you break out your selfie stick, know that the researchers did identify some exceptions.


For instance, when participants were already engaged in an activity or when taking a picture interfered with the experience, their enjoyment was nearly equal to those who didn't take photos.


When the experience wasn’t enjoyable to begin with, taking a picture actually decreased the participants’ enjoyment of the experience.


The researchers also acknowledged gaps in the knowledge of how pictures affect our memory of an experience and how our individual beliefs about taking pictures affect our ability to get enjoyment through taking a picture.


But for now, keep snappin’ those sunsets -- you won’t regret it.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

One Awful Tweet About T-Swift Sums Up Society's Retro Ideas About Female Sexuality

$
0
0

PSA: Women are not things, and their body parts are not food items.


Unfortunately, Twitter user Jennifer Mayers, a self-described “wife, mother, Christian,” doesn’t quite seem to get that. In a tweet from June 15, Mayers, 44, compared her daughters’ vaginas to pop-star Taylor Swift’s vagina. She did so by posting a photo of two sandwiches. 


(We can only assume that the subtext of this tweet is that Mayers’ daughters vaginas are pure and neat and good, while Swift’s is not.)



Since June 15, the tweet has been retweeted nearly 900 times. And it has (unsurprisingly) elicited a significant amount of negative backlash.














Though it’s been argued that Mayers’ account may be “satire,” she frequently tweets vitriol, with no indication that it’s anything but earnest. (And after all, “satire” that doesn’t read as satire can still incite harassment, hatred and shame.) 


One of Mayers’ most recent tweets is a blog post of hers where she calls Alton Sterling, who was gunned down on July 5 while selling CDs outside a convenience store, a “thug,” and describes the Black Lives Matter movement as “nonsense.”


What’s most problematic about the tweet comparing Taylor Swift’s vagina to a sandwich (if we’re being anatomically correct, we’d wager that Mayers meant vulva, not vagina), is that this isn’t just objectification, it’s slut-shaming.


Women do not exist to be consumed and judged for our decisions, sexual or otherwise. We are people, capable of feelings and desires and emotions. And, yes, some of those feelings and desires and emotions may pertain to love and sex. 


Again: What Taylor Swift ― or any woman ― wants to do with her body and her love life is no one’s business but her own.  


When we are reduced to sexual playthings, objects, SANDWICHES, it’s a message to young girls ― in Mayers’ case, her own daughters ― growing up that objectification is normal. That this is okay.


And it’s not.


We much prefer these more playful spins on Mayers’ tweet:





Women are regularly told by men that we are less than ― that we aren’t worth what men are worth, that we are there for pleasure and nothing else, that our voices don’t need to be heard.


We’re oppressed enough. We certainly don’t need it from other women.


We kindly suggest that Mayers take a note from Hillary Clinton’s book, and #DeleteYourAccount. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


I Read VF's Margot Robbie Profile And Have No Idea What The Words Mean

$
0
0

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a woman in want of a Vanity Fair (or Esquire or Vogue) profile must be subjected to ham-fisted musings about her brand of beauty by a male writer. 


Take the opening paragraph of today’s lengthy Vanity Fair feature on actress Margot Robbie:



She is 26 and beautiful, not in that otherwordly catwalk way but in a minor knock-around key, a blue mood, a slow dance. She is blonde but dark at the roots. She is tall but only with the help of certain shoes. She can be sexy and composed even while naked but only in character. As I said, she is from Australia. To understand her, you should think about what that means.



If you’re reading those sentences and thinking, hmmm, I know what those words mean separately but I don’t understand them strung together in that order, you’re not alone. Vanity Fair’s Rich Cohen is just one in a long line of male writers who seemingly become truly befuddled when confronted with the conventional beauty of a famous woman ― and subsequently take it upon themselves to “figure her out.”






Cohen’s profile traces Robbie’s path to Hollywood fame from Aussie soaps and looks forward to her role as Harley Quinn in the upcoming “Suicide Squad.” But those stories are obscured by descriptions of Robbie “wander[ing] through the room like a second-semester freshman,” and the way her hair fell “around those painfully blue eyes.” Six paragraphs in, we get a mention of her “ambition” but only in the context of how it was “masked” by her “beauty and speed of ascent” into fame.


Everyone wants to read a celebrity profile with a little color ― after all, these pieces are meant to give us some insight into who these famous humans actually are beyond the glamorous Instagrams and publicity-driven soundbites. But what does a writer’s lust for an actress’ “painfully blue eyes” really tell us about that actress?


The thing is, we know what Margot Robbie looks like! She stars in movies! She is photographed frequently! Those photographs appear on the covers of magazines ― like Vanity Fair!


Flowery, borderline skeezy descriptors about the looks of female celebs have practically become de rigueur for these types of long-form profiles ― Sky Ferreira “looks like a dirtier Madonna” with “killer tits” (LA Weekly), Megan Fox is “a screen saver on a teenage boy’s laptop, a middle-aged lawyer’s shower fantasy” (Esquire), Sofia Vergara has “Colombian curves” (also Esquire). And yet, it’s something we rarely see employed when exploring the lives and psyches of famous men.


As a thought experiment, writer and editor Donna Dickens swapped out Alexander Skarsgard’s name for Robbie’s.


“Yep. Still creepy,” she tweeted. 






Famous women are expected to be beautiful at a bare minimum. When a female celebrity is young, that beauty is a puzzle to be solved by the men who gape at it. When she ages, it’s something she has lost, or worse, something she has attempted to hold onto by other means, in which case we accuse her of losing herself. (See: Renee Zellweger.)






So, major magazines who commission these celebrity profiles: Next time you have the opportunity to dive into the life of a fascinating famous women, hire a writer who cares to see past the subject’s eyes. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The 10 Oldie-But-Goodie Books Worth Re-Reading This Summer

$
0
0

Books are like old friends who you haven't seen in a while. You always loved being in their company and still remember some of the great things they've said, but you haven't thought of visiting them in years. The lazy days of summer are a great time to get reacquainted. Chances are, they haven't aged a bit. Here's some suggestions to get you started:


1. Bonfire of the Vanities by Tom Wolfe.


Often called the quintessential novel of the 1980s, Bonfire was a phenomenal best-selling success. The story is a drama about ambition, racism, social class, and greed in 1980s' New York City and brought the term "master of the universe" into our vernacular. 



 2. The Red Tent by Anita Diamant.


This first-person narrative tells the story of Dinah, daughter of Jacob and sister of Joseph. The "red tent" is the women's menstrual tent where Dinah learns to sing the songs of women and hears the stories of her grandmother and the goddesses of her people. Sisterhood and contentment. 



3. Seventh Heaven by Alice Hoffman.


Meet the 1950s suburbs, rocked when a mysterious divorcee named Nora Silk moves in. Strong, sexy, and determined to raise her two children without a husband, Nora's liberated spirit foreshadows the decades ahead.


While we pretty much love everything Hoffman ever wrote, this is the one that stuck in our memories. 


 



4. The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison.


Morrison's first novel was written while she was teaching at Howard University and raising her two sons alone. The story is about a year in the life of a young black girl named Pecola with an inferiority complex because of her eye color. The book tackles racism in America, incest, and child molestation and has survived despite numerous attempts to ban it from schools and libraries.


 



5. The Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy.


This novel, first published in 1986, centers on events affecting former football player Tom Wingo's relationship with his family. His elder brother, Luke, died tragically and his twin sister Savannah has attempted suicide and is now in a deep depression.



6. The Thorn Birds by Colleen McCullough.


Possibly the greatest love story ever told, says us. The Thorn Birds centers on the forbidden love between an extraordinary woman and a good but ambitious priest. A great struggle arises between this love -- the forbidden fruit --  and the priest's ambition to become a Cardinal.



7. Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri.


This collection of nine short stories, first published in 1999 and chosen for the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, speaks to the lives of Indians and Indian-Americans who are trapped between their birth culture and the New World.



8. City of the Beasts by Isabel Allende.


Allende's coming-of-age novel is the first in a triology. Think Indiana Jones, but with better monsters and mystery.



9. Self-Help by Lorrie Moore.


This collection of stories will make you laugh and make you cry. Love, love, love Lorrie Moore. Deserves to be read in the same breath as Nora Ephron.



10. Heartburn by Nora Ephron.


Any book by Nora Ephron works for us, but Heartburn is the classic funny take on the breakup of the perfect marriage that wasn't. It's still the best "congratulations on your divorce" gift out there.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

It's Time To Embrace The Singular ‘They,’ A Humanistic Pronoun

$
0
0

The Telegraph published a poll last week, asking readers whether the singular they ― as in, “My friend ate a bagel. They beamed with perfect joy” ― is a correct use of grammar. The 1,000-plus voters were torn on the issue: 54 percent said “no,” and 46 percent ― myself included ― said “yes.”


The poll resulted from a linguistic kerfuffle between Merriam-Webster’s Twitter account and Andy Smarick, an author and a member of the Maryland State Board of Education.


“The astute may have noticed a difference in our feed. Our witty and fabulous social media manager is away. But don’t worry, they’ll return,” @MerriamWebster tweeted, circumventing the clunky and unnecessary task of identifying the employee’s gender.


“I won’t be baited into a pronoun agreement fight [sic] I won’t be baited into a pronoun agreement fight I won’t be bait...,” Smarick tweeted.


The dictionary’s temporary social account manager then explained that they were using the singular they, and that the dictionary adheres to descriptivism. “We follow language, language doesn’t follow us,” they tweeted.


“Language rules are all that separate us from the animals,” Smarick then said, via a social media platform on the internet, a technological feat that wrests upon thousands of years’ worth of progressively advanced scientific discovery.






But about that pronoun: The singular “they” is the linguistic equivalent of tearing down gendered bathroom signs, along with the less invisible but more harmful dividers that stand between men, women, and people who identify as non-binary. It’s a way of eschewing labels when they’re irrelevant to a story or sentence, and is one of a few alternatives to gendered pronouns, including invented descriptors ne/nem/nir, xe/xem/xyr and ve/vis/ver


As with most social developments, accepting the singular “they” or one of its substitutes may have growing pains. Using a plural word to describe an individual might feel like cause for pedantic wrist-slapping, and so your Pavlovian response is to avoid it. But rejiggering an old word to make it different and purposeful is a switch that’s more likely to catch on than introducing a new word entirely. This is how pronouns have changed for centuries: incrementally.


If altruism isn’t really your thing, there are other cases for the singular they. Anonymity is more possible online, where communication so often happens today. Venturing to guess at an anonymous writers’ gender gives it undue importance, as though the fact that a writer is a woman or man is more important than any other defining attributes, like their self-selected username or handle.


And, the pronounage previously deemed proper ― “he or she” ― is a clunky, ugly mouthful. Shouldn’t language be beautiful, or at least efficient?


For these reasons, the singular “they” was embraced by The Washington Post last year, when it was also awarded Word of the Year by the American Dialect Society. Merriam-Webster considers it a word they’re “watching,” or considering for entry into its pages. In a blog on the word they quote famously playful poet Emily Dickinson in writing, “Almost anyone under the circumstances would have doubted if [the letter] were theirs, or indeed if they were themself.”


So, creative writers, copy editors and linguists are beginning to accept the social import and verbal grace of the singular “they.” But language users ― i.e., we other humans ― are undecided on the issue.


Is there any other field that generates such vehement disapproval of the decisions experts decree? Diet, perhaps: The New York Times reported this morning on the foods that the public thinks are good for you, but nutritionists consider unhealthy.


Both fields are murky and seemingly ever-changing, leaving the public to its own devices. Everybody eats, and almost everybody speaks, making pseudo-nutritionists and pseudo-linguists of us all.


UPDATE: Since the publication of this post, Andy Smarick wrote a post of his own addressing his comments. After speaking with colleagues and researching how the singular they is being used today, he said, “I’ve learned a great deal, and I’m much more aware. For example, I better understand and appreciate why those for whom the ‘singular they’ is already an integral part of an identity-sensitive lexicon interpreted my response as a provocation.”

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Welp, There Is Now A Tinder App For Art

$
0
0

You’re crammed onto a couch with friends, all hunched around a single glowing iPhone like cavemen absorbing the warmth of a fire. Squeals and giggles erupt along with the sounds of “Ew, no!” and “OMG, yes!” The barely audible swish of a finger swiping back and forth conducts the scene. 


The images that are popping up on the phone screen, however, don’t depict hot young men and women looking for a casual hookup or potential partner. Rather, they’re artworks, eager for you to swipe right.


Wydr is the new Swiss-based app that bills itself as Tinder for art. As the developers explain on their website, “By changing the way users interact with art and offering them a Tinder-like way to tap into the art market, we break down traditional barriers and reinvent the interaction between artist and art lover.”


Artists from around the world can upload their work to wydr through their website. Prices, determined by the artists, range from as low as $56 to over $64,000. According to Tech Crunch, over 400 artists have uploaded their work so far. 



Users then open the app and swipe away to their heart’s content, their “swipe right” pile building up in a virtual gallery they can shop from later. Over time, the app aims to understand each user’s taste and curate the offered selection according to their aesthetic inclinations. The app hopes, perhaps ambitiously, to become the art gallery for the 99 percent, breaking down the traditional barriers that separate the art lover from the art establishment. 


This ritual of passive, instinctual decision-making, reverting complex entities into a simple matter of yes or no (now!) has become all too familiar to most millennials. Even something as magical, powerful and mysterious as a work of art can be reduced into a quick question of left or right, hot or not. The average person spends 15 to 30 seconds in front of a painting at a museum, which already seems wildly short. To scale that down to a single second or two, especially when you’re considering actually buying the work, seems to be pushing in the wrong direction.


Furthermore, most of the art featured on wydr, well, isn’t that good. Maybe it’s just the selection I got on first perusal, before my tastes had been properly calibrated. Or maybe it’s the fact that art isn’t best experienced against a sad white background on an iPhone screen. Whatever the case, I had a lot of swipe lefts. 



You can download the app for yourself -- it's free -- and let me know how it goes in the comments. May you find the art equivalent of true love or, at the very least, a casual hookup. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Haunting Portraits Show Hunters At The Spots They Killed Their Trophies

$
0
0

At first glance, Pierre Abensur’s photographs from his series “Subjective Trophies” resemble hyperrealistic René Magritte paintings ― an untamed wilderness, a well-dressed man or woman (often in a jaunty hat), a taxidermied animal frozen in the frame. None of these elements seem quite appropriate together. The effect is surreal and even jarring.


One specific Magritte masterpiece inspired Abensur in working on the series. “I often refer to the painting of Magritte, ‘This is not a pipe,’” he told The Huffington Post via email. The painting, “The Treachery of Images,” famously captioned a representation of a pipe with the words “Ceci n’est pas une pipe.”


“Taxidermy is mainly an ideal representation, even sometimes fantasized, of the animal, even if it uses few organic parts of it,” he explained. When we look at a preserved animal ― a trophy from a hunting trip mounted on the wall, a display in a wildlife exhibit ― what we’re seeing isn’t actually a gazelle or a bear, but the taxidermist’s interpretation of a gazelle or a bear, reconstituted from real skins and bones. For hunting trophies, this means first killing the beasts, then using artistic methods to make them look alive even in death.



Abensur says he's long found this tension -- between hunting wild game and then trying to preserve the bodies in lifelike poses -- fascinating. It's "a post-mortem homage that revealed a strong evidence of paradoxical love," he put it to HuffPost. "Why did they decide to do taxidermy with a particular animal? The answer was in the story of that particular hunt, still very clear in their memory even if it had happened decades ago."


And yet, he noticed, so often portraits of hunters are set far from the place where they stalked their prey, in rooms stuffed with bearskin rugs and mounted moose heads. "The importance of the location had to be taken into consideration," he told HuffPost. 


Inspired by traditional portraits featuring lavishly dressed noblemen geared for the hunt, he decided to ask his subjects to gussy up in their finest attire and take a trophy back to the location where the hunt took place.


"The most difficult was to persuade people of the importance of the costume," Abensur recalled. "They may have considered this surrealistic touch as a wish to ridicule them, which was absolutely not the case." (Though it can seem slightly ridiculous, it's certainly no more ridiculous than a well-dressed businessman hanging the head of a zebra he killed on his office wall.)



The resulting photos capture both wilderness and the very domesticated humans who sometimes choose to venture into it ― and the artfully altered animal trophies they take from it. The combination is unexpected, but hauntingly beautiful. Abensur told HuffPost that he hopes audiences who see the photos will feel the images “like a distant echo in their unconscious memory.” Even for non-hunters, the evocation of our day-to-day selves colliding with our most adventuresome memories is somehow magical and poignant all at once.


As eerie as it can be to see a motionless, blank-eyed stuffed animal back in its natural habitat, where it once ran free, the image honors the experience of the hunter and the hunted in a way a stuffed trophy room never could. Abensur, who is not a hunter himself, told HuffPost he “started this project without any provocative intention [...] My approach was not to take a pro- or anti-hunting/trophy position.”


Instead, he says the idea was to explore the concept of hunting trophies and why hunters created them. “If I had to quote a common denominator between all these hunters,” he concluded, “I would say pride.”


Check out more of Abensur’s “Subjective Trophies” photos below and on his website.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Fairytale' Paintings Show A Side Of Black Lives History Overlooks

$
0
0

The subjects of Amy Sherald’s paintings have skin the color of charcoal ― an overcast hue that exists outside the spectrum of race as we often categorize it. The grey tone, made from a combination of black and Naples yellow, transforms Sherald’s models from humans to mythical beings, embodying radicalized physical attributes while rejecting the primary signifier of race ― one’s flesh. 


“It was an aesthetic decision at first,” Sherald explained to The Huffington Post. “I thought visually it looked fantastic.”


Only later did the decision illuminate a certain freedom. Painting figures with impossibly colored flesh allowed her to explore the stories that had never been told, with subjects ― both real and imagined and sometimes both ― who diverged from the overarching historical narrative of blackness.


“These paintings originated as a creation of a fairytale,” she explains in a statement online, “illustrating an alternate existence in response to a dominant narrative of black history.”



Sherald grew up in Columbus, Georgia, on the border of Alabama. She describes her young self as an introvert who took solace in making art, an activity she could enjoy on her own. Her family was supportive, though not involved in the arts themselves. Sherald didn’t go to a museum for the first time until she was in college. 


From the time she started kindergarten, when she was one of two or three black children enrolled in her private school, Sherald was well aware of her race ― specifically, how it should and should not be performed. “You’re different from everybody else,” Sherald recalled. “You need to speak a certain way and act a certain way. That’s what my mom told me on the first day of school.”


Early on, Sherald absorbed the ability to slip in and out of certain modes of being, like a variety show performer, depending on who she was with and what she wanted to achieve. “In sociology they call it ‘code switching,’” she said. “I can feel just as comfortable in a room full of people who don’t look like me because I understand the social cues of class and race.”



The need to always be on, habitually performing and constantly switching from one persona to the next, is exhausting. And yet, Sherald began to find a sort of power in the ritual, as if her ability to shape-shift enabled a sort of magic potential. 


It wasn’t until Sherald was visiting The Ringling, a museum devoted to the Ringling Circus in Sarasota, Florida, when her personal experiences began to make broader sense. The individuals involved in circus life were constantly playing a role, too; the particularities that constrained them in their everyday lives transformed into feats of strength, wonder and beauty.


“I thought it was interesting that people made a living in this way ― their deformities or things that were wrong with them became a way out of poverty. Circuses became these little functioning cities all their own,” she said.



Sherald quickly noticed, however, that most of the people immortalized in Ringling’s history were white. “I began to think about what black people were doing while all this was happening,” she said. “I started researching alternative narratives, looking for black magicians or circus performers or any type of story that presented a different archetype.”


Sherald never quite found what she was looking for. But she soon realized she didn’t need to. Most likely, Sherald thought, the problem wasn’t that black magicians had never existed, but that their stories, straying from that dominant narrative of black life in America, were not properly documented and slipped out of history’s grasp.


“Why can’t I make up my own characters and paint the people I want to see in the world?” she asked. “I’m depicting the many people who existed in history but whose presence was never documented.”



Sherald usually finds her subjects through random encounters, drawn to someone in real life who exhibits an awkwardness she identifies in herself -- and who fits the handmade costumes she creates. “I see them and I know,” she said.


The artist then photographs her subjects in natural light and works from the photo to create her final image, first drawing the figure in charcoal before going over it in paint. For the paintings’ backgrounds, Sherald opts for mysterious washes of color that deny specific time or place, piecing together an alternate history that floats in a space between then and now.



In “Pilgrimage of the Chameleon,” a man in a fur-lined coat holds a bundle of multicolored balloons, his gaze meeting the viewer’s. In “Miss Everything (Unsuppressed Deliverance),” a woman in a red party hat and white gloves sips from a teacup, her expression at once bored and challenging. Each character seems extracted from an “Alice in Wonderland” type world, where garments are always costumes and people are never just themselves, but a range of roles that can be tried on and swapped out. 


Sherald’s paintings are full of strength, the kind gleaned from vulnerability, and topped off with the whimsical imagination that can prevail over suffering and hardship. Although rooted in history, Sherald uses the past as a point of ascent, replacing the conventional modes of blackness and whiteness with so many shades of charcoal.


As the artist put it: “We get the same stories of who we are ― stories filled with pain, oppression and struggle. But there are other sides to black lives that are not often represented. I’m painting these people.” 


Sherald’s solo exhibition “A Wonderful Dream” is on view until August 27, 2016 at Monique Meloche Gallery in Chicago. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

13 Empowering Photos Show There's No 'Right' Way To Be A Boy

$
0
0

A striking photo series is shining a light on kids who don’t let gender norms prevent them from following their dreams.


Since January, Canadian mom and photographer Kirsten McGoey has been interviewing and taking portraits of boys who pursue interests traditionally associated with girls for a project called #ABoyCanToo.



McGoey told The Huffington Post she drew inspiration for the project from her sons, who are 5, 8, and 11 years old. “I was inspired by movements that spoke to girls being awesome at things that were traditionally ‘boy’ because I was that tomboy girl growing up (still am),” she said, adding, “But that was not my story ― my life was being a mom to boys, and I always think the best art, the best messaging comes from people who live it.”


The photographer’s middle son in particular provided inspiration. “He never walked; he skipped and twirled, danced through his day,” she said, noting that some of his favorite activities are singing, acting, ballet and tap-dancing. “He loves sparkles, pink, rainbows, reading, and has never been concerned if something was ‘boy’ or ‘girl,’” the mom added.


#ABoyCanToo aims to empower kids who dare to embrace their true passions, even in the face of gender bias and bullying. McGoey started the project by photographing her own sons and then reached out to friends, acquaintances, past clients and even strangers on social media. To date, she has photographed 17 boys pursuing interests ranging from dancing to reading to figure skating.



McGoey said she learned a great deal from her conversations with the boys. "The common thread was 'I am [dancing/skating/reading/acting/baking/etc] because it gave me a place in the world where I was good at something,'" she recalled. "In some cases it was the first time they were applauded, recognized and felt valued."


The mom hopes her photos will inspire other kids who may be hesitant to pursue their true passions. She also wants to change other peoples' perspectives about gender norms.


"I have been asked if I worry my son will be gay because he likes pink or dances," McGoey told HuffPost. "I cannot even comprehend how someone equates the two, but I know this project has to work to convince the people who still subscribe to this point of view. It's been quite a while since anyone has said this to me or to my son, he has a great class of friends who accept him as he is -- fun, smart and a pink-loving boy who dances."



According to the photographer, the hardest part of the project has been talking to the older boys and learning about their negative experiences. “Many have bravely told me about the push back they get at their choices,” McGoey said. “But the interesting part is this project is awakening in them a realization that they play a crucial role in mentoring the boys who will come after them. This understanding of their role in society is a part of their journey and gives them value as they see they have a very important message to share as influencers.”


McGoey encourages other families to participate in the project and have discussions about the issues of restrictive gender stereotypes for both boys and girls. 


Keep scrolling and visit her website and Facebook page to see more #aboycantoo portraits and dance class candids, along with captions from the photographer.



H/T BabyCenter

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Why You Should Skip The 'Beach Reads' On Vacation This Summer

$
0
0

Easy, breezy novels like quick-moving romances and action-packed mystery stories are a publishing staple of summer, a popular pick for vacationers in the mood for a little light reading.


But you might be better off skipping the beach read this summer in favor of something a little more substantive, according to a recent paper published in the International Journal of Business Administration.


Researchers queried 65 MBA students between the ages of 23 and 42 on what they read most frequently, then compared the students’ writing skills with their reading habits. 


The students who read academic journals, literary fiction and nonfiction tended to be more sophisticated writers than those who read mystery, science fiction, fantasy, or did all of their reading via online-only news sources, like BuzzFeed or The Huffington Post. 


Writers who were exposed to more complicated syntax tended to incorporate some of that complexity into their own writing.


“If you spend all your time reading Reddit, your writing is going to go to hell in a handcart,” study author Yellowlees Douglas, an associate professor at the University of Florida, told the Boston Globe. “You should be very choosy — and highly conscious of the impact — of what you read.”


And according to the study authors, poorly written textbooks may be the worst example of all: “Ironically, the reading fodder we supply most frequently to our students may more closely resemble the simplified sentences our students also read on BuzzFeed and Tumblr than the sentences they would encounter in, say, The Big Short,” the study authors wrote.


Of course, that’s not to say you should ditch reading altogether if you’d rather relax by the pool with Nora Roberts than the New Yorker. Reading, even the lighter stuff, is linked to myriad health benefits including better sleep, decreased stress, and, if you enjoy fiction, a more developed sense of empathy.


Although the study was small, it’s a good reminder that reaching for denser or more challenging fiction this summer could pay off come fall. Or maybe it’s the perfect time to start that feminist book club you’ve been talking about.


Don’t know where to start? We’ve got you covered:


21 Recommendations For Anyone Who Wants To Read Books And Chill
22 Summer 2016 Books You Won’t Want To Miss
What It Means To Grow Up As A Sex Object 
8 Gripping New Books To Pack On Your Next Vacation
11 Queer Books You Need To Read And Revisit For Summer 2016
A New Novel About Teenage Rebellion Is Summer’s Fieriest Read
21 Books From The Last 5 Years That Every Woman Should Read
30 Books You Need To Read Before You Turn 30

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

27 Glorious Tattoos For Anyone Who Loves Animals

$
0
0

If you regularly fall in love with passing strangers’ puppies or daydream about having an Eliza Thornberry-level connection with wildlife, it’s probably fair to say you’re obsessed with animals.


Unfortunately, you can’t bring your pets with you everywhere you go (sad, we know). But you can show your love for the animal kingdom in a more permanent way.


Whether you want to publicly declare your love of wildlife, memorialize a beloved pet or have a tiny reminder of the fluffier things in life, a tattoo can be the perfect way to give your love of animals a creative twist.


Below, 27 tattoos that will make any animal lover feel complete.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Broadway, TV Stars To Honor Anti-LGBT Attack Victims, Past And Present

$
0
0

“American Idol” veteran Frenchie Davis, “Glee” star Alex Newell and two-time Tony-nominated actor Robin de Jesús are among the many performers who are lending their talents to a New York concert honoring the 49 victims of the June 12 mass shooting in Orlando, Florida.


Hosted by New York’s Rattlestick Playwrights Theater, the July 11 performance will be a concert presentation of composer Max Vernon’s “The View UpStairs,” a new musical based on the largely-forgotten arson at the UpStairs Lounge, a New Orleans gay bar, in 1973. It’ll offer audiences a sneak peek at the show, which is aiming for an Off-Broadway debut in 2017, and benefit Equality Florida, an LGBT advocacy group based in the Sunshine State. 



Vernon told The Huffington Post that he hopes to “acknowledge where we’ve come from, and how far we still have to go” with the concert, which will also feature performances by Broadway’s Jay Armstrong Johnson, Gideon Glick, Doreen Montalvo and others. Before the Orlando’s Pulse nightclub massacre, the UpStairs Lounge was the nation’s most deadly attack targeting the LGBT community, killing 32 people. 


“I couldn’t believe that something so important to our country’s history had been swept under the rug,” Vernon, who first learned about the attack as a gender and sexuality studies major in college, said. “I wanted to use the fire as a way to examine what we’ve gained and lost over the last 40 years in our fight for equality,” he said. Musically, he added, the show’s ‘70s-inspired score nods to the “soul and vitality” of his favorite singer-songwriters, including Stevie Wonder, Elton John and David Bowie. 



Since he’d spent so much time researching the history of the UpStairs Lounge fire for his musical, Vernon said he felt “re-traumatized” when he first heard the news of the Pulse shooting


Many of the evening’s performers felt similarly. Glick, who is expected to reprise his role as an embattled gay man in Joshua Harmon’s “Significant Other” on Broadway next year, couldn’t be more thrilled to participate in Vernon’s concert given how “galvanized” he felt after Orlando. 


“The longer we can keep Orlando in conversation, the better chance we have to make sure that its impact isn’t for naught,” he told HuffPost. 



Added de Jesús, “Perhaps if we all tried to have more empathy for the things and people we don’t know, understand or agree with, we wouldn’t let the fear drive us to do such senseless things, like hurt one another.” 


Ultimately, the unfortunate similarities between the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting and the 1973 attack on the UpStairs lounge have taught Vernon that “community isn’t something we can take for granted, but something we all have to work to reinforce and cultivate.”


“With self-love, unity, and inclusiveness, hopefully we can prevent future acts of senseless violence,” he said.


Here’s to hoping this July 11 concert is a start.


“The View UpStairs: A Benefit Concert for Orlando” plays New York’s Rattlestick Playwrights Theater on July 11. Head here for more details. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Rejected Opening Ledes For Vanity Fair's Margot Robbie Feature

$
0
0


You can be highbrow. You can be lowbrow. But can you ever just be brow? Welcome to Middlebrow, a weekly examination of pop culture. Sign up to receive it in your inbox weekly.


On Tuesday, Vanity Fair published its summer cover story: a Rich-Cohen-penned profile of the actress Margot Robbie, who appeared most recently in “The Legend of Tarzan.” The profile was widely criticized, particularly for its opening lines. The original lede can be found here; below, some imagined first drafts:


1.


There are no hot chicks in America, so we have to go to that place from which Mel Gibson and Iggy Azalea oozed to find a girl next door. In case you’re as backwards as everyone else in Australia and never saw “The Wolf of Wall Street,” her name is Margot Robbie. She is of age, if you know what I mean, and beautiful, not in that dear god what is that?! kind of way but like a saxophone solo in a rock song, a teal-and-mauve carpet, Al Gore doing the Macarena. She is blond but could probably get that shit touched up. She is tall, but not as much without heels, so don’t worry, my vertically challenged bros! Even while naked, she can be sexy but in, like, a classy way. As I said, she’s from Australia. For some reason, that makes a big difference.


2.


America is so far gone, we have to go to that godforsaken spit of land where they dumped all the English criminals to find a girl next door. In case you didn’t read the cover of this magazine like some dummy, her name is Margot Robbie. She is young enough to be some 60-year-old retiree’s paramour, but not so young that it’s too creepy, you know? She is beautiful, not in that bored Ryan Reynolds at a party way but like a 7-year-old learning to play violin, a raw filet, an English folk dance. She has hair. She is tall but not when she takes off her shoes, like a witch. When she takes off her clothes, she is still hot. As I said, she is from that big patch of spider-y desert in the South Pacific. To understand her, place this magazine on your face and try absorbing its contents through osmosis.


3.


America is so lacking in attractive females we have to go to a country where the average internet speed is even slower than it is in the U.S. In case you need absolute clarity, her name is Margot Robbie. She is just past her prime childbearing years, biologically speaking, and beautiful, not in that Emilia Clarke’s eyebrows way but like an aria performed while gargling, a bathtub drain clogged with hair, a deaf cat. She has yellow hair, but naturally it is brown. She is 5-foot-6 without heels, which seems like a reasonable height. She’s confident in her body but not too confident. As I said, she is from Australia, specifically Dalby, in Queensland, according to Wikipedia. To understand her, you should think about what that means, and then tell me.


4.


America is so far gone, we have to go to Australia to find a woman that we are attracted to but don’t find too intimidating. In case you’ve missed it, I will condescend to spell out her name for you: M-A-R-G-O-T R-O-B-B-I-E. She is far enough from age 30 to make me feel like a teenager again, and she is beautiful, not in that Iris Apfel’s glasses way but like a cassette tape of whale noises, a pickled radish, a pack of Showtime dancers. The exposed roots on her blond head prove she’s just basically down to chill. She is tall with the help of certain shoes, and I can’t honestly decide whether that’s a deal breaker. Sometimes, she takes off her clothes and poses for a camera because that is part of her job, I guess. As I said, she is from The Land Down Unda’. To understand her, go to any Outback Steakhouse and order the Bloomin’ Onion. Eat.


Follow Sara Boboltz on Twitter: @sara_bee

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Chinese Worker In Ghana: Why Are Wild Rumors About China So Prevalent In Africa?

$
0
0

Eric Olander and Cobus van Staden are the duo behind the China Africa Project and hosts of the popular China in Africa Podcast. We’re here to answer your most pressing, puzzling, even politically incorrect questions, about all things related to the Chinese in Africa and Africans in China.


China’s engagement in Africa is a distinctly 21st century phenomenon and, as such, is still poorly understood by most people, most notably among Chinese and Africans themselves who are still getting to know one another. In that spirit, we’ve started this new column as a way to help spark dialogue and cross-cultural communication in order to explore this fascinating, complex relationship.


In many instances, people are either too shy or embarrassed to publicly ask that question that could be misconstrued as insensitive or politically incorrect. In issues like this that touch on questions of race, power and culture, things can get messy real fast. Instead, we’ll take each question seriously, and with the benefit of our backgrounds in China-Africa journalism and academic scholarship, we’ll do our best to give you a thoughtful, well-reasoned response.



Dear Eric & Cobus, I’m a Chinese office worker in Shanghai. I’ve worked overseas, including in Ghana for a few months. Because of this experience I am interested in China’s relationship with Africa and have been following your China-Africa Project for a while.


Recently we have seen many crazy rumors in Africa about China. The worst one was the recent story in Zambia that China is exporting human meat in cans to supermarkets in Africa. Who would believe such a story? Yet many Africans seemed to believe it. I do not understand how anyone could believe this.


Why do so many Africans believe such silly stories about China?


― Sent via email from Shanghai


* * *


​You are completely right that we have seen a rash of wild rumors about China in Africa recently. The Zambian meat story was a particularly crazy example, another is the allegation that a Chinese company took over Zambia’s public broadcaster.


So where do these rumors come from?


I think many of them come from pure ignorance. African school and university curricula traditionally haven’t contained a lot of East Asian history, literature or geography. Because of colonialism African education was generally focused on Europe, and later the U.S., and after the end of the colonial era, there were attempts to counter this bias by focusing a lot more on Africa. That hasn’t left a lot of energy or resources to focus on Asia. This means that Africans simply know less about China as compared to say France or the U.K.





In second place, despite the fact that Africa has been the victim of the way the colonialists divided the world into “civilized” and “uncivilized” zones, Africa has also been strongly influenced by Western views of East Asia. Throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, Western people have portrayed Asia as strange, exotic, disturbing, decadent and so on. Some of this bias has stuck in Africa. We frequently see remnants of this European colonial view of Asia popping up in African discussions about East Asia as a whole and China in particular.


Another reason is simply the fact that people are simultaneously impressed and freaked out by how successful China has been. Among all the previously colonized countries talking about enriching their people through industrialization, China actually went ahead and achieved unprecedented success by doing just that. The very scale of its success, coupled with the fact that people don’t know a lot about China, tends to lead to crazy stories to try and explain the phenomenon. Japan faced a lot of similar rumors during the 1980s.



'It will take a while, but eventually real human engagement will triumph over online memes.'



Lastly, Africa is finally entering the social media era. With internet networks being extended across the continent (frequently installed by Chinese companies) the first wave of African social media users are now online. With the internet comes crazy memes, conspiracy theories and gossip. China’s own netizen communities provide great examples of this tendency. As Africa’s social media use grows, so will the volume of wild rumors ― that’s just the nature of the internet. The fact that many of these stories revolve around China simply shows how central China has become to how Africa thinks of the world. Chinese presence on the African internet is strong because China’s presence in Africa is strong.


So what can China do about this? The best thing is to tell its own story more effectively. This doesn’t mean simply sending more pro-China propaganda into the African press (there’s a lot of that already.) Rather, it means telling its own story ― warts and all ―  acknowledging problems when they occur, and explaining the successes that have been achieved. It will take a while, but eventually real human engagement will triumph over online memes. Until then, China can only do what we all do with internet trolls ― ignore them.


― Cobus


Ask Eric & Cobus at questions@chinaafricaproject.com. Subscribe to their weekly email newsletter at www.chinaafricaproject.com and subscribe to their weekly audio podcast at www.itunes.com/ChinaAfricaProject or from your favorite podcast app.


Also on WorldPost:




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images