Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

Pentatonix's Cover Of 'Where Are Ü Now' Is An A Cappella Dream

$
0
0


It's pretty much universally agreed upon that Jack Ü's "Where Are Ü Now" featuring Justin Bieber is a killer song. 


But leave it up to Pentatonix to make it even more mind-blowingly amazing. 


The a cappella superstars shared a music video of their cover of the song on YouTube on Friday, and needless to say, it was stunningly beautiful. 


Oh the harmonies! The voices! The beautiful faces! There's really nothing to not like about this cover. 


Now excuse us while we shamelessly listen to this 800 more times. 


 


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Why Wearing Redface To A Sporting Event Or Anywhere Else Is Wrong

$
0
0

American sports fans wearing redface to celebrate their favorite team isn't anything new. Unfortunately, at Thursday night's NFL game between the New York Giants and Washington's football team at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, a Washington football fan appeared to do so once again -- along with a headdress and feathers. 





First reported by The Huffington Post on Thursday night, the Washington fan's costume has since been covered by ESPN, the New York Daily News and TMZ. 


While many were quick to decry the fan, others questioned what was so bad about the costume


"So what?" is not only an ignorant reaction to seeing redface, but a harmful one as well. It's evident that many Americans don't think redface is offensive, even though Native American advocates and citizens agree it is. 


"The reason why redface is harmful and so offensive is because it does dehumanize. It turns us into a caricature," Simon Moya-Smith told The Huffingont Post on Friday. Moya-Smith is a citizen of the Oglala Lakota nation and an editor at Indian Country Today, an online news magazine covering Native Americans. 


Whether we're talking about the "Hollywood Indian," Rooney Mara playing Tiger Lily in the upcoming "Pan" movie or a sports fan in a headdress, Moya-Smith believes that American popular culture has conditioned us to be apathetic toward racist depictions of Native Americans. 


"The fact that the dehumanization of Native Americans is so embedded in American culture that people hardly flinch, other than the Native American and the conscientious objector ... that’s the issue here. It’s not just this individual. It’s the culture that allows this," Moya-Smith continued. 


American sports culture has also done its part to promote intolerance toward Native Americans, says James Peterson, director of Africana Studies at Lehigh University.


"Unfortunately, it is very, very difficult to teach young people and citizens of America that redface is offensive when you have an institution like that NFL or high schools or college sports that essentially promote redface ideology without any explanation or without any historical context," Peterson told HuffPost.





"What we have to be able to say to a person putting on redface and to the people who feel like it’s not a problem, is that it tucks in stereotypes that emerged out of oppressive colonial history, and for Native Americans, emerges out of the most comprehensively complete genocide," he continued.


Brian Howard, a legislative associate for the National Congress of American Indians, points toward the early 20th-century decline of the Native American population as one of the main causes for the rise and acceptance of Native American mascots, logos and names in sports. 


"A lot of people believed that Native Americans were going to die away and become a part of history," Howard told HuffPost.


Lacking visibility outside of stereotypical depictions in white American culture, Native Americans and their 567 federally recognized tribes -- each with their own heritage, culture and religious beliefs -- were collated into a single redfaced stereotype.


"It really becomes a symbol for these caricatures and these stereotypes that are incredibly derogatory. Whether it’s the bloodthirsty savages, the noble savages, the simpleton -- redface is associated with that," said Crystal Echo Hawk, president of Echo Hawk Consulting, a social advocacy consulting firm for Native American tribes and nonprofits.



A photo posted by Sam Hendel (@hendelsam) on



 


Sometimes redface has been compared to blackface in media and among Native American advocates to help people understand how offensive it is. Howard said the "the redface issue is completely tied with blackface." Moya-Smith agreed, but said the problem is that many people can't see how the two are related. "They can’t see that it’s similar to blackface. They just can’t," added Moya-Smith.


Peterson, however, doesn't think people should argue against redface by linking it to blackface. Because popular instances of blackface still happen, he argued, we still haven't even completely established that blackface is actually offensive. 


"I’m not sure that it’s productive for us to tie redface and blackface together," Peterson said, arguing that because blacks and Native Americans both have extensive and distinct histories of oppression in the United States --  histories that clearly aren't fully understood by those who accept or feign ignorance about redface and blackface -- they should be discussed separately. 


"I think we have to keep telling that narrative about both of these histories, because people don’t want to hear it," he concluded. 


Echo Hawk is an activist for Native American social issues. According to her, the continued caricaturing of native peoples is a direct hindrance to enacting dearly needed policy changes. 


"How can anyone take us seriously when we’re working in the realm of policy change with the federal government, the states and even our local communities, when we’re objectified and seen as ridiculous caricatures and not taken seriously?" she asked.


On the advocacy front, it's hard to fight for change when some believe Native American subjugation is a matter of being politically correct.





"As soon as we’re able to have a serious conversation and not get caught up in this rhetoric of political correctness or some other excuse like that, because it’s not about that," Howard said. "It’s about having a mutual respect for another human being."


 


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Advice From A Rocker: 2016ers, Keep Us Off Your Campaign Playlists

$
0
0

It's a story that gets retold in every election cycle: a political candidate -- and let's face it, it's almost always a Republican candidate -- plays a rock song at a campaign event, and before the rally is over the artist identified as the soundtrack provider is issuing statements of condemnation. This year, this fate has befallen Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee and Donald Trump. But all anyone wanted to do was rock out!


Is there any way to bridge this divide? On this week's "So That Happened," we're hoping to find out. We enlisted the help of musician and songwriter Ted Leo, who understands where many rock musicians are coming from and also understands the soul of a rock enthusiast well enough to have some forbearance for those politicos (like Rand Paul and Chris Christie) who can't give up their sincere rock fandom. (The segment with Leo starts at 15:16 in the clip below.)




Leo says that some obvious ideological divides play a role in the hostile reactions that the mainly conservative presidential candidates are evoking from the mainly liberal rock musicians on their campaign playlists. Indeed, the one example we could find of a musician asking a liberal politician to stop using their music was Sam and Dave's Sam Moore -- whose 2008 request to then-Senator Barack Obama was as polite as pie. But there is a deeper level to the musicians' desires, akin to not wanting to see their music in commercials, Leo notes. "In the same vein," he says, "you don't want this piece of your soul, this piece of your art that you've created, to become permanently attached to something in a kind of soundbite-y or soundtracked way."


"I've been asked to play rallies ... and I've done some, and not done others," Leo says, "There's always a little bit of conflict ... I cherish my ability to be a social critic through music, I don't necessarily want to be seen as cozying up too much to anybody in power."


Leo has gone a little out of his way to help one 2016er. Back in August, he and bandmate Aimee Mann teamed up with late night talk show host Conan O'Brien in an effort to get little-known Democratic presidential candidate Lincoln Chafee from 0% to 1% in the polls.




According to HuffPost Pollster, they are currently 40 percent of the way there.


This podcast was produced and edited by Adriana Usero and Peter James Callahan, engineered by Brad Shannon, with assistance from Christine Conetta.


To listen to this podcast later, download our show on iTunes. While you're there, please subscribe, rate and review our show. You can check out other HuffPost Podcasts here.


Have a story you'd like to hear discussed on "So, That Happened"? Email us at your convenience!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











13 Surreal 'Mutations' GIFs That Will Freak You Out

$
0
0

Scroll down, if you dare, and enter a world of the bizarre and extreme.


This collection, "Mutations," comes from New York City-based video and photo artist Sam Cannon. Cannon specializes in creating surreal GIFs, which she says explore "the space between still and moving images," according to Culture Pop.


The GIFs include a multitude of expanding mouths and eyes. So many eyes.


Take a look: 



Also on HuffPost:



-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











3D Movies: Now With Fewer Headaches (Finally)

$
0
0

Just last year, it seemed 3D movies might've been on their way toward extinction, or at least an irrelevant corner of Hollywood. Ticket sales for 3D screenings were down -- the lowest in seven years. Their cheesy pop-out effects gave us headaches, to say nothing of the markup on tickets.


Now, it suddenly looks like they're here to stay. "Jurassic World" was a hit in 3D, earning nearly half its massive opening weekend revenue through 3D tickets, and a number of other big-budget films -- J.J. Abrams’ “Star Wars” and Ridley Scott’s “The Martian,” among others -- are set to be screened in 3D this fall.


Hold your groans. Hollywood knows you think 3D is just a novelty gimmick, but it wants you to know it's working on it. You may not even hate some of the 3D movies coming out these days -- if only because the technology is less headache-inducing. 




The Huffington Post chatted with RealD executive Anthony Marcoly, whose company’s screening tech is used in about a third of 3D screens in the U.S. The format, he said, is at its best when it helps to immerse an audience in some fantastical location, like Pandora, Mars or Neverland. 


Creating that sense of immersion requires careful consideration from the outset for how to take advantage of the technology without creating the clumsy pop-out effects that strain our eyes and give us headaches.


The goal now is not to jolt you out of your seat, à la the 3D rendition of "Jurassic Park," but to create an experience that is more organic and comfortable. James Cameron’s 2009 “Avatar” is still held up as a prime of this new style of 3D filmmaking. Cameron put time and care into the movie's production, layering wisps of flora and fauna to add texture to the fabric of the story. And, more recently, did you notice how none of the dinosaurs in "Jurassic World" wanted to eat your face? 


Planning is a significant improvement, Cinema Blend's Kristy Puchko told Business Insider last year, but so is kicking off filming with the right equipment. 


There are two ways to make a 3D movie: film with 3D cameras, or film in 2D and convert to 3D after. Conversion is cheaper, but leaves room for human error -- lag time between frames that our eyes pick up. And less-than-seamless results can leave us with headaches. 


"You are forcing a square peg into a round hole, essentially," Puchko said of the process. This fall’s “The Martian,” “The Walk,” “Pan” and others were filmed with 3D cameras.


Even screening 3D films requires special care, as they need a lot more light than regular 2D reels. Polarizers and 3D glasses dampen light, requiring more efficient digital projectors to make up the difference. If not, guess what, it’s harder on the eyes. But theaters have been updating equipment for a few years now. And they’re working on perfecting something even better: laser projectors. IMAX has started using lasers to provide brighter, sharper colors and more detail than even digital projectors can, making the picture easier to watch. (Seriously, laser projectors are gonna be awesome.) There's also talk of glasses-free projectors, now in very early stages, for people who are turned off by 3D specs. 




Don’t worry about 3D taking over every screen, though.


"I'm not one that says, 'Every movie should be in 3D,'" Marcoly told HuffPost. "I think that's a mistake that was made when 3D started out." 


Directors, however, have different opinions on which genres are a good fit for 3D. The format has always fared well with animation. Big spectacle films, like many of Hollywood’s recent and upcoming 3D offerings, are good choices, too. It may be harder for us to envision ourselves watching more intimate films wearing those silly glasses. But some directors want to give it a shot. Wim Wenders is preparing to release a 3D drama with James Franco and Rachel McAdams in December. (A drama!) “Amelie” director Jean-Pierre Jeunet told The Hollywood Reporter he believes 3D “is much more for quiet movies.”


In any case, Hollywood seems to be finally addressing the question moviegoers have been asking themselves for years: If it doesn't add anything to the experience, why should we pay an extra $5?


To anyone with doubts, Marcoly's response is simple.


"You know," he said, "you've got to try it again." 


 


Also on HuffPost: 



For a constant stream of entertainment news and discussion, follow HuffPost Entertainment on Viber.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Artist @PlaceUnknown Uses Instagram To Explore Gay Men And Social Media

$
0
0

In the digital age, Instagram gives gay men the ability to showcase their sexuality and physicality in ways that they never could before.


For some gay men, use of Instagram seems to revolve purely around using sex and sexuality to gain attention -- and followers -- through hashtags like #instagay, #scruff, and #gayboy, just to name a few.


One artist is taking this idea to a new level by harnessing it for social commentary through use of his own Instagram account. Using an extremely realistic doll, the account -- @placeunknown -- showcases the lifelike toy in different photos, videos and poses that Instagram-obssesed gay men use, making it almost impossible to tell the man we're looking at isn't actually real.



The artist, who prefers to be known only by his Instagram handle @placeunknown, lives in The Netherlands and has a degree in fine arts. The Huffington Post chatted with him this week about what inspired him to start this project and what he hopes gay men will take away from it.



The Huffington Post: What inspired you to start the account?
@placeunknown: I wanted to create a gay equivalent to Barbie’s @barbiestyle but have it mean something more than just a doll/figure Instagram account -- something that reflects on how gay men use social media (in this case Instagram) as a way to share shirtless-to-nude photos mostly. With that in mind, I was curious to see how the doll would be perceived if he did some “sexy” shirtless photos and if people would be fooled into thinking it’s an actual human being. With Instagram, where photos are “liked” with only viewing them for a second or two, how well would a doll fit into the many shirtless men that appear in hashtags like #instagay #gayscruff etc? I wonder how many don’t even notice it’s a doll.



How did you create the doll you're using? How did you decide how he should look?
Some time ago while browsing action figures his head instantly caught my eye as he seemed to look different from most figures. He is more sexy and more lifelike, so I had to buy his head. I then started searching for bodies to use and the more realistic the body looked, the more he came to life. At first, I just took some random photos of him and noticed how real he looked, so I started to play with making him appear in photos as if it were a real human being.



You seem to be parodying a very particular kind of gay man and the way that he uses Instagram. What are your thoughts about how Instagram is being used by gay men?
If you look at, for instance, the hashtag #instagay you’ll be guaranteed to see shirtless men and even a cock here and there. Most of the photos have a very sexual connotation. I have the feeling that social media used by gay men will always center around sex and showing off muscular, fit bodies. It seems to revolve around luring in more followers by posting shirtless pics or nudes (is that what it takes to get more followers?). With that said, some of my recent followers have really surprised me in the way they use Instagram. Yes, the shirtless pics are there but they’re playing with “masculinity” in a way. For instance @heyrooney and his “masc4masc” and “bubblegumfem” only show how ridiculous the whole concept of “masculinity” is in the gay community and outside. Accounts like his show us a different way in which gay men use Instagram and even tell a message while doing so -- something that I value deeply and have great respect for.



What has the reaction to the account been?
The first few photos I posted didn’t get much feedback or likes, but the more I posted the more people “got it.” There are some that can see what I’m doing here and there and some who plainly think it’s creepy (I even got blocked by a few I won’t name…). The last two weeks I got many positive reactions that only stimulate me to make more and hopefully gain more attention/followers. It’s fun to see how people interact -- whether they go with the illusion of the doll being real or not.



What do you want viewers to take away from this project?
Pay more attention to what you post, view and like. Have more imagination and don’t take things so seriously (meaning Instagram, #instagay, followers etc). Like the quote by Oscar Wilde I used in the description: "Illusion is the first of all pleasures."


Want to see more from @placeunknown? Head here.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











To Win This Video Game You Must Scrub Down Men In A Locker Room Shower (NSFW)

$
0
0


(Note: The video above may not be appropriate for work and other sensitive environments)


Randy Yang is an artist and video game developer whose work explores a number of queer issues.


Over the past year, he has created several games tied to sex and sexuality, including "Hurt Me Plenty," a spanking games about consent and kink, "Succulent," a game about fellatiating a popsicle, "Stick Shift," which focuses on giving your car a handjob and "Cobra Club," a dick pic studio game that touches on issues of surveillance and privacy. 


In his latest game, called "Rinse and Repeat," the user is positioned in a communal locker room shower with a number of other bathing men. One man walks in, addresses the player as "Guy!," and soon asks for help scrubbing his back -- and other areas -- as he showers.



Ultimately, what Yang seems to be exploring in "Rinse and Repeat" is a sub/dom relationship in a hyper-eroticized space that often serves as a fantasy for many men who have sex with men. He told The Huffington Post:



"I got feedback on my spanking game, 'Hurt Me Plenty' from players who wanted to roleplay more of a submissive role, so I thought about what submission might be for a video game player. I decided one form of submission could require players to conform to the game's terms -- the game tells you how to scrub him, and the game tells you when it will feel like playing. The game acts like it doesn't really care about the player, which is maybe part of the fun of it. My game isn't unique in this sense, lots of video games have domineering relationships with their players, but I think my game is one of the few that sexualizes this dynamic, especially in a gay way designed to poke at a predominantly straight dude gamer audience."




Much of Yangs work also focuses on disrupting the traditionally heteronormative and misogynistic world of the video game industry. Not only do all of his games involve some exploration of sex or sexuality, but they are also inherently queer.


"Gay sex is the only thing that's hot and dirty enough to subvert the video game industry's lazy reliance on graphic violence and consumerism," Yang continued. "In this way, I see sex as a powerful way of diversifying video games, to help re-think what kinds of games are possible to make. Don't get me wrong, I love games about killing people and looting their corpses repeatedly for hours -- but when that's 99% of what's marketed to gamer audiences, I wonder whether there's room in games for the other 99% of human experience that doesn't involve killing people and looting corpses. It's a cursed art... but a kiss will set it free."



Want to play "Rinse and Repeat" and check it out for yourself? Head here to download it from Yang's website.


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Pope Makes Surprise Stop To Bless Statue Of Catholic-Jewish Unity

$
0
0

Pope Francis made a surprise stop at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia on Sunday to bless a statue that celebrates the Vatican's ties with the Jewish community.


Dozens of students and faculty members crowded onto campus after hearing that Francis would be paying a visit to their school. 


The pontiff spent a few moments in quiet contemplation in front of the statue, called "Synagoga and Ecclesia in Our Time," before splashing it with holy water.





The pope wanted to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Nostra Aetate, a document promoting interfaith unity and dialogue, said Vatican spokesman Rev. Federico Lombardi. The 1965 statement took a strong stance against anti-Semitism and emphasized the spiritual bonds that tie Catholics and Jews together.


However, many medieval Catholic cathedrals still feature statues that demonstrate a broken relationship between the two faith communities. The Church, or Ecclesia, is often represented by a crowned female figure who is majestic and triumphant after conquering the Synagogue, or Synagoga, portrayed as another female figure, blindfolded and defeated.


In contrast, artist Joshua Koffman's statue illustrates a close relationship between Catholics and Jews. It shows the two figures sitting side by side, holding their holy scriptures and engaged in a conversation.





"This statue is exactly a demonstration of two sisters of the same dignity, the church and the synagogue," Lombardi said during a press conference before the pope's visit.


Pope Francis' good friend Rabbi Abraham Skorka also greeted the pope on the campus of the university. The Argentine rabbi met Francis before he became pope and the two wrote a book together in 2010 about their interfaith dialogue.  


Saint Joseph's University is a fitting home for the piece. Soon after Nostra Aetate was published, the Jesuit university created an Institute for Jewish-Catholic Relations to deepen knowledge and understanding between the two faiths. 


After visiting Saint Joseph's, Francis moved on to Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin Parkway to celebrate Mass with an expected crowd of 1 million.














 


Follow HuffPost's live blog of the papal visit: 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Man Recreates A Van Gogh Painting With Plants In A 1.2-Acre Field

$
0
0

Every piece of art is rare. After all, all art is an expression of its creator, and no two people are completely alike.


 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Nothing But The Truth?: On Lying And Memoir-Writing

$
0
0

This week, Elizabeth Gilbert released what I assume was a highly anticipated new book, Big Magic: Creative Living Beyond Fear. Unlike her last book -- a novel about a plant-loving adventurer set in the 19th century -- it’s nonfiction, offering the reader not imaginative scenes to insert herself into, but instead clear directives for living a fulfilling life.


This isn’t the Gilbert who made her fiction debut in Esquire, nor is it the Gilbert who boldly admitted to being a relationship-wrecker in an unsettling yet heart-wrenching essay for New York Times Magazine. It’s not the Gilbert who’s capable of emotional nuance, but the Gilbert of Eat, Pray, Love, that divisive memoir plumb with mantras, mocked by many for its earnestness and purported clear-headedness.


“I used to be bad, but now I’m good,” Eat, Pray, Love seems to say, implying that the author writes from a fixed place of wisdom, rather than the constantly shifting perspective of a human person with a human memory, tricky and malleable. It’s this false division between then and now, this idea that our lives are progress bars, either stalled or moving, that can lend a memoir an air of icky sentimentality.


In the not-so-distant past, this colored how readers talked about the genre of memoirs; that it’s inherently mushy, self-absorbed and full of canned advice and unsubtle tips. When memoir-writing saw an initial sales spike in the '90s, William Gass related it to our culture’s rampant narcissism. Plus, he wrote, the autobiographer is less reliable than the biographer. “He is likely to treat records with less respect than he should,” Gass wrote. “And he will certainly not investigate himself as if he had committed a crime and ought to be caught and convicted.” Well, maybe he won’t. But, if the arguably feminine rise of the personal essay has taught us anything, it’s that incriminating oneself is cathartic -- and it’s enjoyable for the reader, too.


The negative perception proliferated by writers like Gass might’ve fizzled a little, but there are still decriers. Celebrated fiction writer Claire Vaye Watkins, for example, chooses not to discuss the life of her father, Charles Manson’s right-hand man, via memoir, but through the themes in her stories. In an essay about her father's own personal writings, she declared their dubiousness: “Memoir is the meaning-making genre, and meaning-making is a specious, slippery project, a dance I distrust.” She echoes the sentiment of Don DeLillo, who, according to memoirist Mary Karr said, “a fiction writer starts with meaning and then manufactures events to represent it; a memoirist starts with events, then derives meaning from them.”




It’s this false division between then and now, this idea that our lives are progress bars, either stalled or moving, that can lend a memoir an air of sentimentality.

That hasn’t stopped the project of relating one’s own life from climbing bestseller lists, and, perhaps more significantly, earning literary awards. Of this year’s National Book Award longlist nominees for nonfiction, three can be straightforwardly categorized as memoir: Hold Still by Sally Mann, Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehihi Coates, and Ordinary Light by Tracy Smith. Another is a collection of journalistic travelogues; yet another is about the intellectual lives of octopuses, but the topic is examined through a collage of research and personal anecdotes. In these latter two books, facts that might’ve once been delivered from the vantage point of an authority are explored through the eyes of a writer on a mission to learn. This makes for an enjoyable experience for the reader, who can learn along with an author.


As for the three nominees that most squarely fit into the genre of memoir -- sharing events from one’s past in an attempt to honestly explain a universal experience -- there’s something more artistic about them than the schmaltz the word “memoir” can bring to mind. They’re not quite “It Happened to Me” essays, but they belong to an expanding class of memoirs, ones popularized in the literary community by canonical writers like Frank McCourt and Maya Angelou. In her new book The Art of Memoir, artful memoirist Mary Karr pays homage to both of these writers, and defends their craft, while commenting on the best way to embark on writing a personal story.


Karr, author of the absurd yet true east Texas family saga The Liars’ Club, and a veteran teacher of the form, offers up a theory on why memoirs have garnered both respect and popularity in recent years. “Changes in the novel have helped to jack up memoir’s audience,” she writes. “As fiction grew more fabulist or dystopic or hyperintellectual [...] readers thirsty for reality began imbibing memoir.”


So, tasked with filling the big shoes of realistic fiction writers before them, the best memoirists imbue their stories with the particular kind of honesty novelists strive for: not factual honesty, per se, but emotional honesty. In a novel, the decisions of a narrator must be plausible, must fit with how she has acted in the past, and the events that’ve shaped her. This is why writers like Elena Ferrante will scrap an entire, beautifully wrought manuscript on the basis of dishonesty -- logical or emotional leaps were made for the sake of a pretty phrase.


In The Art of Memoir, Mary Karr repeatedly emphasizes the same sort of moral compass, where north isn’t the direction of legalistic truths, but truths that are more difficult to discern: Is this really how I felt at that time in my life, or do I only wish I was that self-aware? Did my parents’ divorce really influence my character, or is it some genetic heavy heartedness that I inherited from them at birth? These, Karr says, are the sorts of questions memoirists must confront -- and the task isn’t easy. She cautions potential writers not to view their personal stories as therapy, instead likening the craft to mastering your own psychology so that you, the memoirist, become a sort of therapist, your reader your patient. 


Though she’s decried memoirs that include anything other than straight-up truths in the past, Karr has allowed herself the right to shift on the subject, writing, “I sound like such a pious twit, the village vicar wagging her finger at writers pushing the limits of the form.” She notes, as an example of truthful-ish memoirs, that Pam Houston “claimed her novels were 82 percent true and ascribes that same percentage to her nonfiction.” “Fair enough,” Karr concedes, adding later that listing facts does not a cohesive story make -- some embellishment, emotional and otherwise, is necessary.




There is, after all, a fluidity between who we were to other people, who we thought we were, who we think we were, and who we think we are now.

There is, after all, a fluidity between who we were to other people, who we thought we were, who we think we were, and who we think we are now. And many contemporary memoirists confront this fluidity, either indirectly, or by personifying it, making it the nexus of their stories. One such writer, Maggie Nelson, recently published a memoir about her romantic relationship with artist Harry Dodge, whose transgender identity led Nelson to question the sturdiness not only of our conceptions of gender, but of the words and labels we use more broadly. So, her book The Argonauts features sporadic scenes, her relationship the steady center of a whirring story made up of flashes of memory and remembered quotes from books read long ago. Nelson’s style of writing parallels the act of remembering: some moments are big and unforgettable, others hazy, and editorialized after the fact.


Another writer acknowledging the fluidity of fact and fiction is Lidia Yuknavitch, who recently released a novel in which several of the characters closely resemble her own close relations. She’s written a memoir, too -- The Chronology of Water -- which, conversely, is a true story about her sexuality and experiences as a competitive swimmer, with an arc that moves not forward, but back and forth, sometimes in circles, and, ultimately, outward, in a ripple of self-realization. Yuknavitch -- as well as Nelson -- doesn’t have a life story that’s solid enough to be touted as a commodity or a coffee mug mantra. Their memoirs are like big oceans of emotion and memory and fact, whirling eddies and currents flowing in all directions.


But, Karr asserts, there’s a line to be drawn somewhere. There is, she says, a clear-cut difference between embellishing memories for the sake of emotional honesty, and, well, just making stuff up for the heck of it. “Truth may have become a foggy, fuzzy nether area,” she writes. “But untruth is simple: making up events with the intention to deceive. Even in this day of the photoshopped Facebook pic, that’s not so morally hard to gauge. You know the difference between a vague memory and a clear one, and the vague ones either get left out or labeled dubious.”


What side of that line do memoirists like Wednesday Martin, author of the controversial and potentially embellished Primates of Park Avenue, fall on? Martin, who has her Ph.D. in comparative literature and cultural studies, wrote what she dubs an anthropological memoir about motherhood in Manhattan, much to the interest of fellow New Yorkers and parents alike. But, it was later revealed that certain details didn't make sense with the story's timeline: anachronistic references to Uber, macaron shops that weren't yet built, let alone frequented by WASPs at the time of her writing.


"Where does the lying stop?" critics cried, ignoring the fact that condensing a timeline into a book-sized box is common practice among memoirists. This is because, when we shell out twenty-or-so bucks to hear someone's life story, we want our money's worth: drama, intrigue, emotional honesty. All of these must be provided, we demand, in a piece of writing as verifiable as the locations in an atlas.


When we tell stories -- in writing, out loud to our friends, in the form of jokes with a punchline -- we owe our listeners the good feelings that come with dramatic timing, with building anticipation and providing welcome release. The desired effect is to allow listeners, and readers, to feel how we felt, not to merely be aware of the literal circumstances lending to the feeling. If a memoirist can achieve that -- and if she must take a few liberties in truthfulness to get there -- then she's done something right.


 Also on HuffPost:


 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Banksy Will Send Material From 'Dismaland' To Help Shelter Refugees In France

$
0
0

LONDON (AP) — Street artist Banksy has said he will send the material from his closed amusement park in England to France to help shelter refugees who are camped out there.



Banksy said on his Dismaland website Monday that all of the timbers and fixtures from the park are being sent to a refugee camp outside the northwest French port of Calais for the construction of shelters. Thousands of refugees are in the Calais area seeking entry into Britain.


"Coming soon ... Dismaland Calais," the artist said on his posting.


The unusual amusement park that closed Sunday after five weeks poked fun at consumer culture. Tourism body Visit Somerset says the exhibition brought 20 million pounds ($30 million) to the faded seaside town of Weston-Super-Mare. Officials say it drew more than 150,000 people.



 


Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Step Inside The Homes Of Famous Artists Who Live With Art

$
0
0

Have you ever wondered what the inside of your favorite artist's bedroom looks like? Have you fantasized about the sculptures and paintings that might adorn her living room, turning an apartment or house into a habitable museum?  Have you questioned whether he showcases his own work or a mish-moshed collection of his friends? Does she relish throw pillows? Does his kitchen table look like a masterpiece itself?


The people who collect art are unique -- and the artists who collect are an even more specific bunch. Unlike the philatelists (those who study and commonly collect stamps) and the coin enthusiasts of the world (sometimes referred to as numismatists), art collecting is frequently done at a slower pace. Instead of frenetically acquiring valuable artifacts, paintings and photographs are often painstakingly chosen according to intensely personal and subjective standards. Sure, the prickly art market can help some predict the monetary potential of a new ceramic centerpiece, but it can't help an artist who collects judge the aesthetic reaction they're going to have living and often working with that centerpiece.


"Artists who collect ... generally fall into two categories," Robert Storr, dean of the School of Art at Yale University, writes in the forward to the new book, Artists Living With Art (Abrams). "First come those who can't resist owning things that catch their eye and in some way remind them of roads not taken or possibilities that they have not exploited." And then, he adds, there are "those who immerse themselves sequentially in specific types of work or periods in art history." The two paths to art collecting result in different yet wildly beautiful sets of interior scenes, as obsessively curated rooms possess canvases, carpets, chairs and candles that mirror a person's overarching relationship to color and form.


While we can theorize about the intentions of living artists like Chuck Close, Marilyn Minter, Mickalene Thomas or Rashid Johnson, sometimes the best method of understanding an artist's collecting persona is to take a peek into their homes, the places where they stash their troves. Thanks to editors Stacey Goergen and Amanda Benchley, we have that opportunity.











 


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Prisoner Is Present

$
0
0

In 2010, artist Marina Abramovic spent six days a week, seven hours a day sitting in a chair in the Museum of Modern Art, silently facing a single viewer sitting across from her, for around 700 hours total. This year, for three days in October, a former Guantánamo detainee named Mohammed el Gharani will sit similarly in a studio in West Africa, where he lives, while his image is streamed straight into another New York City venue, the Park Avenue Armory, for visitors to confront.


Gharani is collaborating with artist Laurie Anderson on a piece entitled "Habeas Corpus," named after the legal action by which detainees can seek relief from unlawful imprisonment. The Latin phrase literally translates to "This is the body." From Oct. 2 through Oct. 4, Gharani's physical body will be in West Africa, but his image will be projected onto a massive body cast sculpture approximating his oversized shape inside the massive Armory drill hall. Gharani, as a former Guantánamo inmate, will never be allowed to enter the United States again. Yet through telepresence, his image can exist where his body cannot. 


For the entirety of Abramovic's performance, she sat in silence, making eye contact with each viewer who would sit face-to-face with the artist. For the majority of Anderson's performance, Gharani will sit in silence, inviting viewers to meditate on the relationships between taking time and serving time, absence and presence, what is human and what is inhuman. Approximately once every hour, however, Gharani will tell a story, elaborating on the eight years he spent as one of the youngest detainees in Guantánamo history. 


Gharani is one of 15 inmates documented by the Department of Defense as having spent time in Guantánamo Bay while still a child. In total, 775 people have been held captive at the detainment camp. Some have been eventually released without charge, classified onward as "enemy combatants." Others have died in Guantánamo's grip.


As of September 2015, there are 114 people currently detained



Anderson contacted Gharani through a human rights organization called Reprieve, that works with, among other groups, detainees from Guantánamo. Anderson explained the still-evolving artwork germinating in her mind to Kat Craig, an attorney at Reprieve, and Craig responded that she knew a potential interested subject. That subject was Gharani. In March, they spoke on the phone, a conversation mediated by Craig. In April, they met in person, in Gharani's current home of West Africa. 


"The first time I saw [Gharani] was in the gym [in West Africa], when I was doing Tai Chi," Anderson explained in an interview with The Huffington Post. "I was just in the middle of doing this thing called a 19 Form and I was conscious of someone being in the gym, and it was him, and then he just left. Later that day I realized, wow, that was Mohammed."


Gharani was born in Chad, a desert zone in Central Africa. He grew up herding goats with his impoverished family in Saudi Arabia, where he was prevented from studying and treated as an outsider because of his Chadian roots. He was eventually accused of being linked to an Al-Qaeda cell in London in 1998 -- when Gharani was 11 years old and still living in Saudi Arabia. It would be three years later, when he was 14 years old, when Gharani was captured in Pakistan during a raid on a mosque and sent to spend eight years inside Guantánamo's walls.


Now 27, Gharani is a free man living in West Africa. "When he came out he was like where am I?" Anderson said. "He’s been in prison for longer than he’s been released, still."


Upon meeting Gharani for the first time, Anderson was struck by one quality in particular. "Shy," she said. "He was very shy and so was I. It was a shock for me to meet him. I couldn’t get the images out of my head of what had happened to him." Gharani's physical features formed unspoken narratives in themselves. He was missing teeth; his back was injured; his head had been scarred too.


Before long, Gharani began sharing stories with words as well, tremendous stories of his time in Guantánamo Bay, a place that remains for many Americans out of sight, out of mind. A place where there is, in Anderson's words, "an information blackout." 


At first, Anderson intended Gharani to remain silent throughout the performance, the thrust of the work coming from the power of his sheer telepresence. However, after hearing his gut-wrenching tales, spoken in English with glints of Caribbean, West African, and Arabic accents shining through, she felt she had to include them in the work. As Anderson explained: "I was the last person who wanted to stop him from talking!"


Storytelling, a common thread throughout Anderson's work, is at the core of "Habeas Corpus." Gharani's stories reference waterboarding, solitary confinement, electroshocks, those brutalities so unspeakable they too often remain cloaked in silence. For Anderson, there stories, and the language in which they are told, can bring truth and liberation. 


And yet "Habeas Corpus" also addresses the ways language has been contorted and stretched to construct the very War on Terror itself. Anderson argues, at its nucleus, the War on Terror is nothing but a lattice of stories. "They’re called enemy combatants and then they’re non-persons and then you can do whatever you want to them," she said. "As someone who uses language, I’m fascinated by this insanity." 



It's not only language that is yanked from the mouths of the imprisoned and turned against them. It's images as well. Technically, a law dictates that a prisoner, once incarcerated, no longer owns his or her own image. Anderson discovered this law, which she jokingly speculated was left over from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, in the midst of an earlier art project, while attempting to beam the image of a different prisoner into an Austrian church. Eventually the project was cancelled; the prisoner did not own his image and thus no one could use it. 


In "Habeas Corpus," Anderson transforms Gharani's image into a means of escape and liberation. In much of Western religion and ancient philosophy, the body is seen as a vessel -- or sometimes a prison -- for the soul inside. Liberation is the soul freed from its physical constraints. For Anderson, it seems that the virtual image is the 21st century means of freedom and escape. If the body is trapped, incarcerated, or banished, telepresence steps in, offering portals to places the soul cannot. 


In Anderson's words: "It’s about the transgression of coming back into the United States when you’re not allowed. Through your picture." While for Abramovic, presence -- physical, personal presence -- is the privileged form of being, Anderson offers a plugged-in alternative. Transgression through virtual reality, like a digital apparition.


This magic of transgressing boundaries through images resonates with many other pressing issues related to migration -- specifically, the current refugee crises in Syria and the tragic disappearance of 43 students Mexico. And, of course, those in the United States.


"It was very hard for me to separate [the piece] from real things that were happening," Anderson explained. "Like those two prisoners last year, [David] Sweat and [Richard] Matt, who were on the run from the prison upstate [in New York]. Before they were captured and one was shot, the other inmates were brutalized and beaten; they had bags put over their heads. And I thought, 'Wait a minute! When did we start doing all this stuff like it’s standard treatment?'"


Anderson traces the national numbness regarding brutal punishment of prisoners back to the early days of Guantánamo Bay. "We were told: 'These are the worst of the worst and make them bend over and treat them like dogs.' We did terrible terrible things to these people. It really haunts me. How we got the rights to say they’re nonpersons, has never been described by anyone anywhere. But once they did, they could treat them however they wanted."


Is Anderson's project, in part, an attempt to bring viewers face-to-face with a so-called "non-person" and illuminate his undeniable humanity? Kind of, Anderson says, but not so much. "Not so much as a person," she explained, "but as a presence, a kind of witness. There are a lot of human rights groups who want to show these people as, 'Oh yeah, they’re people just like us. And they’re creative and they write poems!' I’m glad they do but why do we have to make people into palatable versions of themselves? Why do they have to be nice?"



"We broke them. And then we expect them to be poets and painters?"

In part, that's why the physical presence of Gharani's streaming sculpture is not quite familiar or palatable, but somewhat uncanny, spooky even. He's not quite a human but a digital witness, oversized and hollowed out. A 21st century spirit returning to tell his tale."It’s really eerie to see a statue speaking," Anderson commented. Anderson describes the body cast sculpture on which his image will be projected as Cubist in style, reminiscent in size and stature, ironically enough, of the Lincoln Memorial.


Yes, Abraham Lincoln, a symbol of American freedom -- who, coincidentally enough, suspended Habeas Corpus for a brief period during the Civil War -- is an unexpected yet strangely relevant figure to draw into the dialogue surrounding the piece. 


The fact that Gharani's journey to and from Guantánamo eerily mirrored that of individuals in the 15th century slave trade resonates too. To prepare for their performance, "Mohammed and I went to prisons in West Africa, these holding prisons in castles that had been there for centuries," Anderson said. "Weirdly, it was the same route as the slaves captured in Africa, marched across the continent, kept in these dungeons on the coast, and then shipped to the Caribbean. From Africa to Guantánamo, this was Mohammed’s route as well. I thought whoa, this is a story that has another big picture in it."


Gharani's story overlaps with far more instances of injustice, including racial profiling, police brutality, the role of the camera as a mode of surveillance and a weapon in itself. In a piece Anderson penned about her work for The New Yorkershe expressed: "I just wish Susan Sontag were still around." In her absence, Anderson dips into the powerful and frightfully ambivalent role of the camera amidst violence today. Policemen don them. Drones employ them. Civilians carry them. 



Anderson and Gharani worked together for six months creating "Habeas Corpus." During their time together, Gharani spoke of his fellow detainee Shaker Aamer, the final remaining British resident at Guantánamo, brought in on the same airplane as Mohammed over years ago. When Mohammed was released, Shaker was the only one able to wish him goodbye and good luck. 


On Friday, September 25, it was announced that Shaker, who has never been charged or put on trial, will be released and returned to the UK. Shaker was detained in 2001 in Afghanistan, suspected of leading an Al-Quaeda cell, though he insisted he was in Afghanistan doing charity with his family. "We talked a lot about Shaker because he was Mohammed's mentor. I haven’t talked to him yet about his release, but I’m sure they will meet soon."


After all that he has endured and all that he has witnessed, Anderson firmly believes that Gharani finally has the chance to tell his story on his own terms. "That really is one of the biggest robberies, as anyone knows who has ever been defined by someone else," Anderson expressed. "Even something like 'you’re so intellectual' -- that becomes your story and you can’t wiggle out of it. He had this story pinned on him that has nothing to do with his life. In this way, he gets to tell his story in print, in projection and in the film. We’re both really, really happy about that."


And despite the unimaginable experience that Gharani was forced to undergo, his story is punctuated with hope and gratitude. "He is a very gentle person. He is somebody who was very clear about the kindness of some of the guards. Some people, at considerable risks to themselves, were kind to him. He knows he can’t make generalizations about huge groups of people, that’s what this is about. We’re not trying to define everybody in some big, giant group. Over here are terrorists, over here are good citizens. It’s super complex and he knows that."


His views on America are similarly nuanced and generous. "After all of this, he loves American comedians. He loves American culture. He would like to come here and visit."


Abramovic's "The Artist is Present" offered a powerful and simple mode of engagement -- the human gaze -- as a somewhat idealistic opportunity for understanding, empathy, connection. Don't bother with screens and texts and virtual in-betweens, the work says, look into the eyes of another person.


Anderson's "Habeas Corpus" operates differently. Certain images deserve to be seen. Certain stories deserve to be told. Not all of those who house said stories are able to meet up in the lobby at the MoMA. While Abramovic's iconic performance strips away the excess, Anderson invites everything in. Every complexity, every historical overlap, coincidence or something more. Telepresence reigns supreme, able to surpass physical laws and limits like a supernatural power. Anderson acknowledges the camera, the virtual image, the story, as powerful tools capable of both truth and lies, art and violence. 


From October 2 through October 4, however, she presents them as art. 


"Habeas Corpus" is part of the Park Avenue Armory Programing. Buy tickets here.


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

18 Best Friend Halloween Costumes That Are Totally Adorkable

$
0
0

Like most things in life, Halloween is more fun with a friend -- or five. What's Cher without Dionne? Or one creepy "Shining" twin without the other? Or Ginger Spice without Baby, Scary, Sporty and Posh?


For all the women out there who prefer to play dress up with their BFFs on Halloween, here are 18 fun costume ideas that require a buddy or two. (They also don't require an insane amount of time, money or effort.)



 


For more clever Halloween costumes for women see below:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Is Why You Should Celebrate Banned Books Week

$
0
0

This year’s Banned Books Week kicked off on Sunday. Buttons were worn. Facebook posts about the ignorance of those striving to make information inaccessible were crafted. Literature was celebrated with zeal. 


As always, those behind the campaign highlighted statistics indicating that the desire to censor -- an impulse humanity has acted upon throughout most of our history, restricting reading materials from school curricula or entire societies -- still exists in America and beyond. And, as always, decriers decried: Books aren’t really banned in America anymore. So what’s the fuss about? 


It’s worth reexamining, then, why Banned Books Week exists, and why it should continue to, in spite of the (currently) waning threat of censorship. 


Established in 1982 by librarian Judith Krug, Banned Books Week is sponsored by a handful of organizations, including the Library of Congress. But the driving force behind the awareness campaign is the American Library Association, which describes it as a promotion of “the freedom to choose or the freedom to express one's opinions even if that opinion might be considered unorthodox or unpopular and stresses the importance of ensuring the availability of those viewpoints to all who wish to read them.” 


As part of its annual campaign, the American Library Association provides a snapshot of where and why people attempted to censor library books in one particular year. This year, Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian topped the list of titles, due to purported cultural insensitivity, drugs, sex and depictions of bullying. Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis came in at number two for similar reasons, and And Tango Makes Three, Justin Richardson and Peter Parnell’s children’s book about a baby penguin with two dads, was third.




The point is not to rank inflammatory books like game highlights. It’s to remind readers that information hasn’t always been free, and that we have librarians to thank for its freedom.

This list, and other such rankings and timelines on the American Library Association’s site, is compiled based on data from the organization’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, an arm that works directly with librarians and teachers who need support when faced with potential challenges. For that reason, it represents only a slice of censorship attempts, many of which go unreported. And, because it is the Office for Intellectual Freedom’s priority to equip those handling censorship attempts with legal support, identifying details about the challenges aren’t revealed to the public.


That this data is murky has always spurred contention, but especially recently. This summer, David Goldenberg wrote for stats-driven site FiveThirtyEight about his attempt to identify the most challenged book in the country. A little poking around on the ALA’s site revealed this to be And Tango Makes Three, but he wanted to verify that with the organization. When the ALA’s Office of Intellectual Freedom declined to provide the writer with raw data -- which contains identifying details about specific school districts and libraries -- he retaliated with an article addressing the statistical validity of its lists. 


In a conversation with The Huffington Post, Assistant Director of the ALA's Office of Intellectual Freedom Kristin Pekoll confirmed that their data is confidential in order to protect librarian's and teacher's jobs -- those combating challenges want to ensure that their position doesn't jeopardize their jobs. So, because these lists aren't for public consumption, it's impossible to discern whether they are statistically valid. But determining whether one book was challenged more times than another book is beside the point. The point is not to rank inflammatory books like game highlights. It’s to remind readers that information hasn’t always been free, and that we have librarians to thank for its freedom. And to be fair, this point could be made without compiling statistically shaky lists, and the ALA would do well to consider other avenues.


Other concerns surrounding Banned Books Week center mostly on semantics. The ALA  unwisely lumps “banned” books and “challenged” books together into one category, although banning a book poses a much greater cultural threat than challenging one. Broadly, “banning” constitutes removing a title from an institution; “challenging” represents an attempt to do so, but the term can encompass even the most innocuous parental griping. That this spectrum is broad and varying, yet discussed as a consistent whole under the banner of Banned Books Week, has raised questions in recent years.


In 2009, Mitchell Muncy wrote an article for The Wall Street Journal titled “Finding Censorship When There Is None.” Parents rallying against Harry Potter isn’t censorship, he wrote. Censorship is a government restricting access to books. He’s right; banning and censorship aren’t necessarily words that should be in our contemporary vocabulary, save to discuss the past and to ensure that our current path carries us into a bright, informational future. As it stands, challenging is the word, and the act, up for discussion.




They do the behind-the-scenes work that ensures challenges don’t turn into bans; that they’re successful in this is a very important thing worth celebrating, and, yes, publicizing.

Challenged Books Week doesn’t have the same rally-cry ring to it as Banned Books Week. That’s because challenges aren’t such starkly bad things. They’re the first step towards a ban, and so they tread on dangerous, uncomfortable territory -- sometimes necessarily so. As Ruth Graham writes in a recent essay for Slate, “a parent merely questioning the presence of a book on a required reading list [...] is part of a reasonable local conversation about public education.”


True! But without careful moderation, these conversations can (and, historically, have) slide into more emphatic demands that a book not be taught in school due to its themes of sexuality. Who’s guarding this slope, preventing a slip from questioning into banning? Librarians.


In her argument against celebrating Banned Books Week, Graham broke down the challenges listed on the ALA’s site. Of 290, 27 concerned public libraries as opposed to school libraries and school curriculums. “Of the 27 cases in which a book was challenged at a public library, the ALA documents a whopping four cases that definitively ended with a book being completely removed from circulation,” she writes, failing to note that it is the Office of Intellectual Freedom’s responsibility to assist in these cases, ensuring said happy outcome.


Almost as an aside, Graham notes that we live in an age where, if a book does happen to be banned from a library or school, citizens can access it more easily than ever. With Amazon! And money. This is fine for those who can afford to buy books that aren't available to them in libraries, and those who have the knowledge of the existence of such books. Libraries don’t pretend to primarily be serving these communities. They support those who need free access to information.


The piece is headlined: “Why Do We Still Publicize Banned Books Week? The Good Guys Won!” Well. Collectively, yes, the side of free information is on a serious upswing. But this isn’t a naturally occurring phenomenon -- as evidenced by our storied history of censorship, and the still-waging war against free expression happening elsewhere in the world. It’s thanks to the work of organizations such as the ALA, which equips librarians and teachers dealing with challenges with advice and legal services. They do the behind-the-scenes work that ensures challenges don’t turn into bans; that they’re successful in this is a very important thing worth celebrating, and, yes, publicizing.


 Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


What 'Strong' Female Characters Should Look Like

$
0
0

Julia Hart worked as a high school English teacher for eight years before she quit her job to create "The Keeping Room." It's rare for a screenwriter's first script to also be her first script to get produced, though, given Hart's revisionist ideas, it only makes sense her career path would mix things up.


"The Keeping Room" made its way to the big screen as a poetic, feminist Western, in which three women, left alone after the men left to fight the war, must defend their bodies and their home against Union soldiers.


Hart shows her strength as a writer by refusing to simply plop women in the place of the stalwart hero, opting instead to explore the complexity available in subverting the politics of the genre. In addition to the apparent resurgence of the Western, Hart adds women to the landscape who are strong not in spite of their vulnerability, but because of it.


In honor of the film's release this past Friday, The Huffington Post spoke to Hart about how she flipped the great American genre on its head and the key to creating nuanced female characters who are not just powerful but empowered.




What inspired you to write "The Keeping Room"?


I grew up watching Westerns. I love Westerns, but I definitely had this longing to see a strong woman walk through the swinging doors instead of a man. 


I also heard a story that inspired it at a friend's family farm in Georgia. After we all had a little bit of moonshine, my friend starting telling me about the myth that came with the farm when they bought it, which was that there were two union soldiers buried out in the field. I thought that was so fascinating because they would have had to have been put there by the women who were left alone in the house at the time. So, that was where “The Keeping Room” started for me. 



I love Westerns, but I definitely had this longing to see a strong woman walk through the swinging doors instead of a man.



There's definitely a masculinity inherent in the Western -- the ideas of ownership and power are crucial to the genre-- how did you reinvent that through a feminist lens?


You can’t just put a woman into a classic male role. You have to reinvent it so it is inherently female. I just thought about all of the classic tropes and cliches of the Western and tried to turn them upside down and make sure that they felt realistically feminine.


The women in the movie are emotional and emotionally connected and emotionally ravaged by the experience. It’s not that classic Western character who’s simply stoic and strong. They need the connection they have with each other. They need to break down and cry. You get all of those colors, that I think you maybe don’t always see classically in the genre.


That's important, I think, to see strong female characters who are also messy and complicated.


You know, in playing around with their resistance, I was thinking in terms of redemption and fear. When you are a woman alone and you are being attacked by a man who is physically more powerful than you and perhaps has more experience with these weapons, you would be afraid. And I think that a lot of the time because women are physically less strong or inexperienced in a way with violence, you have to use that fear to empower yourself.


Ah, that's interesting: fear as a tool.


Yeah, I think fear and empowerment are connected. You know, they use the adrenaline that causes in order to defend themselves.


Usually, when we see a “female action hero,” she’s a super-human-CGI-ed and tough, but it's not real. What I loved about these women is that they're real. The actors are doing everything you see on screen. There are no special effects. Brit [Marling] is really riding that horse, chopping that wood, loading and firing that gun. I think there’s something powerful about not an imaginary woman defending herself, but a woman actually doing it. It's almost shocking because we’re not used to seeing it.



I was insistent that, no, none of the men can come in and rescue them.



How do you feel about the idea of women being saved? Is it possible to have strong female characters be rescued by a man? You obviously avoided that in "The Keeping Room."


That was very important to me, and I had to defend that idea all the way through the shooting process. I was insistent that, no, none of the men can come in and rescue them.


For example, the character of Bill, who is Mad’s lover, comes back to try and save her. It was very important to me to me to show their love and that he would risk his life to come back for her, but also that he not be the one to rescue them. It felt so essential to the type of story I was telling that the women ultimately rescue themselves.



You can be your messy, complicated self and that doesn’t mean you’re not a strong woman.



Is that a rule you have for future films as well? I know you just wrote and directed a second film, "Miss Stevens."


For me, with other projects I’m working on, I’m looking at these classic genres and these classic tropes that have been dominated by men and turning them around and making them female. In the case of "The Keeping Room," it's a Western. I’m also working on a crime thriller. There’s a lot of stories about women that haven’t been told in these genres and there's a lot we can do there.


In flipping male-dominated genres on their heads, how do you define "strong" female characters?


I think the mistake that a lot of movies make -- and I don’t want to name any -- is just kind of dropping a woman into the role of the man. You know, inserting her as the stoic figure who has superhuman strength. I’m sure there are woman who are like that. But the truth of the matter is there are a lot of women who aren’t.


I think what’s so important about feminism is not just showing the “strong” impervious woman, but really showing that women are complicated and messy and emotional. You can be your messy, complicated self and that doesn’t mean you’re not a strong woman. 


This interview has been edited and condensed.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Science Behind Crystal Chandeliers Is A Dizzying Artwork In Itself

$
0
0


Did you know that crystal, in its unstructured form, resembles a lengthy, scaled serpent made of what appears to be many molten orange jolly ranchers? 


In the video above, take a look inside Baccarat's crystal studio, where silica sand, lead and hot ash come together to create some seriously fancy-looking crystal chandeliers.


If you've ever mulled over how the many-limbed crystalline beasts wind up dangling from ritzy banquet halls and hotel lobbies around the world, now is your chance to get educated. If you don't particularly care about the science involved, I'd highly suggest zoning out and watching the ornate lighting mechanisms come into being.


The process behind their creation unfurls like a complex art-meets-science hybrid of the most dazzling degree. And it's all, in typical chandelier fashion, very classy. 



H/T ThisIsColossal


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Giant Megaphones In Estonia Let You Listen To Sounds Of The Forest

$
0
0

Somewhere in Estonia, amid the lush green leaves, encroaching moss and dark bark of the country's forests, is a massive megaphone. Made of beautifully finished wood, the giant horn sits beside two others of its kind, each pointed in a different direction, looking as though they are ready to project, or perhaps capture sounds from different corners of the woods. Large enough for an onlooker to climb inside, the idyllic carvings look like the remants of a centuries-old fairy tale; the one bits of remaining evidence that something magical happened between the trees.


Alas, the megaphones are not hundreds of years old artifacts, left behind by the Vikings of yore. Instead, they are new works of art courtesy of the student architects at the Estonian Academy of Art, nestled into the gorgeous setting of the Pähni Nature Centre, near the border with Latvia.



The project was inspired by the Estonian author and semiotician Valdur Mikita -- a man who declared his desire to build the first "forest library" in the world. With Mikita's ambitions in mind, the Academy sent students into the woods to explore what "reading in the forest" really means. But according to Hannes Praks, the project's leader, the idea of "reading in the forest" quickly morphed into something else entirely, thanks to a chance encounter with a lost grandmother. 


"In the initial stages we sent the students into the forest for a few days, to look for input and inspiration for a possible concept," he explained to The Huffington Post. "The forest seminar failed utterly, because after half a day of intellectual chatter, a helicopter started to circle the forest and a moment later, the woods were filled with the police."


It turned out that a local grandma had gone mushroom picking in the same stretch of woods, losing her way among the dense trees. So the students spent the rest of the seminar helping the police look for the lost woman.


 "It was raining cats and dogs, and the mood was rotten. The search operation had failed and the granny remained lost," Praks said. "It was only a while later that we found out from media that the granny who had spent over 24 hours lost in the forest had returned home, complaining only of a stuffy nose."


As insignificant as the story may seem in relation to the mammoth megaphones, Praks believes the incident became the impetus for his students' eventual project. He cites a particular student named Birgit Õigus, now credited as the author of the megaphones, who decided to imagine not physically reading words in the forest, but reading sounds -- like the cries of people looking for a lost woman. 


"This declaration saved the project," Praks said. 'The symbolic shape of the megaphones helps the user to focus and listen, but -- it can also be used in reverse, to amplify the sounds you make yourself. If you shout into the narrower end of the megaphone, you could also call out for a lost mushroom picker."



 


The students worked with acoustic engineers, experts who could guide the location and shape of the megaphones to enhance the sound production. But Praks explained that a "unique physical listening experience" was not his students' first priority. "The project is very contextual and planned specifically for the Estonian forest," he added. "It might sound a bit esoteric, but it seems to me that, yes, we did spend time on acoustics and sound movement engineering, but not so much to affect the parameters of the object, but rather to open up the soul of the user."


The megaphones work just as well as amplifiers as they do shelters; dwellings that are able to accommodate hikers who might need temporary protection from the elements. "Once inside the megaphone, the hiker would see a wide view of the forest, while the narrower end of the object focuses on a bush of blueberries," said Praks.


During the unveiling of the megaphones, the structures functioned perfectly as tiny stages, in which two of the megaphones housed performing musicians, with the audience sitting in the middle of the installation. "In my opinion, you could perceive a powerful yet serene and clear stereophonic and acoustic effect," Praks noted.


Since the project's opening, the megaphones have become somewhat of a landmark, showing up in Facebook profile pictures across the small country of Estonia, 50 percent of which is covered by forests. While most of us outside of Europe might not have a chance to see the megaphones in person, Praks sent HuffPost a generous selection of images that let us digitally experience the installation.


For those adventurers in the area though, Praks gave us the following, perfectly mysterious instructions for finding the megaphones: "It’s the furthest you can go in Estonia, from the capital."












-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ariana Grande Teams Up With Opera Superstar Andrea Bocelli

$
0
0

Anyone who's listened to Ariana Grande's music knows that homegirl can SING. She has a vocal range and technical proficiency rare among pop stars this side of Mariah Carey, to whom she's often compared.


Still, it takes real guts for any pop singer, no matter how great a voice they have, to try their hand at opera. It's an entirely different beast from pop music, one that generally takes years of training to master. But that didn't stop Grande from recording a duet with world-renowned opera tenor Andrea Bocelli. The two singers just released a version of the song "E più ti penso," which uses music from Ennio Morricone's score for Sergio Leone's 1984 movie "Once Upon a Time in America." 




The song's lyrics, which were written by Italian composers Tony Renis and Mogol, tell the story of two lovers separated by a great distance. "E più ti penso" was first recorded in 2010 by an Italian tenor trio called Il Volo. Their version is totally solid -- but honestly, we can't help but prefer Bocelli and Grande's. 


For the record, this is not a case of Grande besting her idol-slash-rival. Mariah Carey has also performed a duet with a famed male opera singer: the late Pavarotti. The fact that Carey wrote the song they performed together -- and that Pavarotti was arguably an even bigger star than Bocelli -- makes up for the fact that Carey sings in English, rather than Italian. 


Also on HuffPost:



For a constant stream of entertainment news and discussion, follow HuffPost Entertainment on Viber.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Meet The 2015 MacArthur Fellows

$
0
0


Once a year, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation announces its roster of MacArthur Fellows, a designation frequently referred to as the "Genius Grant." The fellowship bestows upon its recipients a $625,000 prize, along with an accolade that manages to celebrate innovative minds across fields, from science to poetry to painting, and just about everything in between. 


This year, the list of MacArthur Fellows ranges from a celebrated writer to an environmental advocate to an inorganic chemist, varying in age from 33 to 72 years old. In total, there are 15 men and nine women represented. The recipients were aware of their award before the 12 a.m. announcement by the MacArthur Foundation this Tuesday. Nonetheless, the winners are celebrating publicly now that the news is out.





"These 24 delightfully diverse MacArthur Fellows are shedding light and making progress on critical issues, pushing the boundaries of their fields, and improving our world in imaginative, unexpected ways," MacArthur President Julia Stasch explains on the MacArthur Foundation website. "Their work, their commitment, and their creativity inspire us all."


The MacArthur Fellowship, founded in 1978, is given out annually to a group of high-achieving individuals in disciplines as diverse as dance, computer science and adaptive design. What was once a $50,000 award has since morphed into a six-figure prize. Past winners include author Cormac McCarthy, photographer Cindy Sherman and astrophysicist Joseph Taylor.


Check out a full-list of the 2015 Fellows below.


1. Patrick Awuah (Education Entrepreneur) 



The 50-year-old founder and president of Ashesi University College was chosen for his efforts in building a new model of higher education in his home country of Ghana. He was an engineer and program manager at Microsoft before he began the university in 2002.


2. Kartik Chandran (Environmental Engineer)



An associate professor in the Earth and Environmental Department of Columbia University, the 41-year-old New York native integrates microbial ecology, molecular biology and engineering to update the process of wastewater treatment.


3. Ta-Nehisi Coates (Journalist)



The MacArthur Foundation praised the 39-year-old national correspondent at The Atlantic in Washington, D.C., for bringing "personal reflection and historical scholarship to bear on America’s most contested issues," namely through his longform essay titled "The Case for Reparations," as well as his two books The Beautiful Struggle and Between the World and Me.


4. Gary Cohen (Environmental Health Advocate)



The 59-year-old co-founder and president of Health Care Without Harm focuses on the environmental impact of American hospitals. The Virginia resident engages environmental scientists, medical professionals and institutions in discussions of sustainability and climate change as they are related to health care.


5. Matthew Desmond (Urban Sociologist)



The 35-year-old associate professor of sociology and social studies at Harvard University studies the impact of eviction on the lives of the urban poor. The Massachusetts-based creator of the Milwaukee Area Renters Study looks specifically at the low-income rental market in the largest city in Wisconsin, noting "that households headed by women are more likely to face eviction than men, resulting in deleterious long-term effects much like those caused by high rates of incarceration among low-income African American men."


6. William Dichtel (Chemist)



A 37-year-old associate professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Cornell University in New York, he is celebrated for his work assembling molecules into high surface-area networks that are beneficial in the fields of electronics, optics and energy storage.


7. Michelle Dorrance (Tap Dancer and Choreographer)



The 36-year-old founder and artistic director of Dorrance Dance in New York has been heralded for combining traditions from tap dance with the choreographic nuances of contemporary dance in works like "SOUNDspace," "The Blues Project," and "ETM: The Initial Approach." 


8. Nicole Eisenman (Painter)



The 50-year-old painter from New York explores themes like gender and sexuality, family dynamics, and the inequalities of wealth and power in her narrative and rhetorical works that span from painting and sculpture to drawing and printmaking.


9. LaToya Ruby Frazier (Photographer and Video Artist)



The 33-year-old assistant professor of photography at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago mixes self-portraiture with social narrative to construct visual autobiographies that emphasize the connection between her notions of "self" and "space."


10. Ben Lerner (Writer)



A 36-year-old professor in the Department of English at City University of New York, Brooklyn College, Lerner's work moves between fiction and nonfiction in an attempt to investigate the "relevance of art and the artist to modern culture."


11. Mimi Lien (Set Designer)



The 39-year-old set designer from New York creates architecturally dramatic sets for theater, opera and dance, such as her full-scale Tsarist Russian salon in "Natasha, Pierre, and the Great Comet of 1812."


12. Lin-Manuel Miranda (Playwright, Composer and Performer)



The 35-year-old playwright, composer and performer from New York has been honored for expanding the possibilities of musical theater for individuals and communities new to Broadway stages, particularly in his work "In The Heights," which tells the story of an immigrant community losing its neighborhood to gentrification.


13. Dimitri Nakassis (Classicist)



An associate professor of in the Department of Classics at the University of Toronto, the 40-year-old classicist is transforming our understanding of prehistoric Greek societies, challenging the long-held view that Late Bronze Age Mycenaean palatial society (1400 to 1200 BC) was a highly centralized oligarchy, distinct from the democratic city-states of classical Greece.


14. John Novembre (Computational Biologist)



The 37-year-old associate professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago is discovering news ways of viewing human evolutionary history, population structure and migration, and the etiology of genetic diseases.


15. Christopher Ré (Computer Scientist)



The 36-year-old assistant professor of computer science at Stanford University is "democratizing" big data analytics using his training in databases and expertise in machine learning to ultimately create an inference engine dubbed DeepDive.


16. Marina Rustow (Historian)



The 46-year-old professor of Near Eastern Studies at Princeton University in New Jersey is notable for her work using the Cairo Geniza texts to draw new conclusions about Jewish life in the medieval Middle East.


17. Juan Salgado (Community Leader)



The 46-year-old president and CEO of Instituto del Progreso Latino in Chicago is praised for his work helping low-income immigrants succeed in the workplace and participate in education programs that equip workers with the skills they need for higher-paying employment.


18. Beth Stevens (Neuroscientist)



The 45-year-old assistant professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School in Massachusetts studies microglial cells and the origins of adult neurological diseases.


19. Lorenz Studer (Stem Cell Biologist)



Studer is the 49-year-old director of the Center for Stem Cell Biology at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York who's credited with a breakthrough in dopaminergic neurons that could provide treatment for Parkinson's disease, and possibly other neurodegenerative conditions.


20. Alex Truesdell (Adaptive Designer and Fabricator)



A 59-year-old executive director and founder of Adaptive Design Association, Inc., the New York resident creates low-tech and affordable tools that help children with disabilities in everyday activities in their homes, schools and communities.


21. Basil Twist (Puppetry Artist and Director)



The 46-year-old puppetry artist from New York is known for his 1998 production, "Symphonie Fantastique," which consisted of an hour-long performance of feathers, glitter, plastics, vinyl, mirrors, slides, dyes, blacklight, overhead projections, air bubbles, and latex fishing lures.


22. Ellen Bryant Voigt (Poet)



 The 72-year-old poet from Virginia has published eight collections of poetry that challenge "will and fate and the life cycles of the natural world while exploring the expressive potential of both lyric and narrative elements."


23. Heidi Williams (Economist)



The 34-year-old assistant professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology focuses on the causes and effects of innovation within health care markets, revealing how the timing and nature of intellectual property restrictions can affect change in the field.


24. Peidong Yang (Inorganic Chemist)



The 44-year-old Professor of Energy in the Department of Chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley, specializes in semiconductor nanowires and their practical applications, such as in the conversion of waste heat into electricity.


 


Also on HuffPost:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images