Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

China's Building A Giant Titanic Replica With An Iceberg Collision Simulator

$
0
0



Looks like Jack and Rose are headed east: A giant Titanic replica will anchor a new theme park in China’s Sichuan province. 


Photos show workers assembling the 882-foot-long, approximately $145 million replica, called the New Titanic. It will eventually include recreations of the famous ship’s ballroom, theater, swimming pool and guest rooms based on Titanic blueprints obtained from around the world, CNN reports.


Plans also include a simulator that will let visitors virtually experience hitting an iceberg, as the original ship did before it famously sank more than 100 years ago. Executives from a Chinese investment firm hosted a ceremony Wednesday to mark the start of construction. 







Unsurprisingly, the decision to turn a tragedy into a tourism opportunity has proven a bit controversial. Hollywood production designer Curtis Schnell, who is consulting on the project, said it is being handled in a “very respectful way,” Reuters reports. 


When finished next year, the replica will remain docked in a reservoir as part of a larger theme park that will also feature replicas of a Venetian church and European castles


This new project is not to be confused with the Titanic II, a real working ship that’ll set sail in 2018. Nostalgia, ahoy!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Classic Books Yanked From Virginia County Schools After Parent Complaint

$
0
0

Two classic, yet oft-challenged, novels have been temporarily removed from bookshelves at public schools in a Virginia school district.


A student’s mother complained at an Accomack County school board meeting in November that her son, who is biracial, had struggled to read passages containing racial slurs. Superintendent Warren Holland recently informed local news station WAVY-TV that To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn had, as a result, been temporarily pulled from the schools. 


There’s no denying that the books depict bigoted conduct and offensive language. According to the AP, racial slurs appear 219 times in Huck Finn and 48 times in To Kill a Mockingbird. The American Library Association rank both among the most banned and challenged books in the nation, and no wonder: according to ALA statistics, offensive language is one of the most common motivations for a challenge.


Nonetheless, both books remain widely read and taught in the U.S., for their literary quality and for the manner in which they grapple with the nation’s sordid racial history. 


The parent who filed the complaint saw the books differently



“Right now, we are a nation divided as it is,” the mother is heard saying in an audio recording of the meeting on Nov. 15[...] “So what are we teaching our children? We’re validating that these words are acceptable, and they are not acceptable by any means,” the parent said.



While many would agree that racial slurs are unacceptable, this argument contains some troubling assumptions: that reading challenging, provocative texts will further a national divide, and that honest depiction of racial bigotry is the same as acceptance of it. There should, of course, be sensitivity to students who are personally affected by hate speech in their reading, but glossing over the brutal history of America only allows the perpetuating of damaging myths.


Shielding citizens, from youth through adulthood, from the full extent of wrongs perpetrated by Americans and the U.S. government prevents the understanding that could allow for real problem-solving. For example, last year, a survey found that nearly half of Americans don’t believe that the Civil War was primarily motivated by Southerners’ desire to keep slavery, despite a historical consensus that it was. Most Americans don’t support reparations ― or even apologizing for slavery ― and this ignorance about the severity and willfulness of the nation’s past crimes is surely a factor. 


“We must know all the facts and hear all the alternatives and listen to all the criticisms,” John F. Kennedy once wrote. “Let us welcome controversial books and controversial authors.” The more different groups sink into different bubbles, reading only preferred news sources (Breitbart.com for one, Alternet.org for the other) and soothing books, the more divided we’ll become ― not less.


“I write to dismantle notions used to build walls that alienate people,” author Nicole Dennis-Benn told HuffPost after the election. Writing and reading things that make us uncomfortable, ashamed, and even angry is a necessary and time-honored part of that process.


Many writers, organizations, and others have spoken out in protest of President-elect Donald Trump’s various comments questioning constitutional rights to freedom of speech and the press. This is no time for our citizenry to turn on those values from inside.


In Accomack County Public Schools, the book banning is not, as of now, permanent. WAVY-TV reports that the parent’s request “will now go before a committee made up of a principal, librarian, teacher, parent and potentially others. The committee will then make a recommendation to the superintendent.”


Holland told the station that there’s no set deadline for when the recommendation will be made.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

What Mexicans Have To Say To Americans Worried About Trump

$
0
0



The United States could use some neighborly advice right about now. 


Vox’s Liz Plank recently hit the streets of Puebla, Mexico to ask citizens about their views on the U.S. in light of Donald Trump’s election. During her trip, she asked her Facebook followers to weigh in on specific questions she should be asking the people of Mexico. 


One native Mexican responded by suggesting Plank ask for “advice on how to deal with authoritarian presidents and government. We have a loooong history of surviving oppression and normalizing violence.” 


The host asked residents to offer some words of advice to Americans who are worried about what Donald Trump’s America may be like. 


The result: some earnest, insightful thoughts.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

These Were The Most Popular Baby Names Of 2016

$
0
0

As 2016 comes to close, BabyCenter has released its annual list of most popular baby names. Once again, the top five names for boys and are almost exactly the identical to last year’s list ― though Lucas and Liam traded places.


New to the top 10 list for girls are Riley, Aria and Charlotte. For boys, Oliver and Elijah are new additions. BabyCenter’s rankings are based on the names of babies born in 2016 to parents registered on the website. 


See the top 20 names for boys and girls below. 


Most Popular Names For Girls



  1. Sophia

  2. Emma

  3. Olivia

  4. Ava

  5. Mia

  6. Isabella

  7. Riley

  8. Aria

  9. Zoe

  10. Charlotte


Most Popular Names For Boys



  1. Jackson

  2. Aiden

  3. Lucas

  4. Liam

  5. Noah

  6. Ethan

  7. Mason

  8. Caden

  9. Oliver

  10. Elijah


As in past years, BabyCenter also analyzed its user data to identify some interesting name trends of 2016.


Powerful Women



BabyCenter found that names of powerful women are on the rise, with Hillary up 64 percent. Other influential women’s names that increased were Amal (up 21 percent), Venus (up 26 percent),  and Ivanka (up 39 percent). 


“We’ve been naming boys after titans of politics, sports, and business for thousands of years,” stated BabyCenter Global Editor-in-Chief, Linda Murray. “It’s refreshing to see the names of powerful modern women being chosen by new parents. Today’s parents want their daughters to be strong and successful.”


Horror



“Stranger Things,” “The Walking Dead” and “American Horror Story” character names were also on the rise in 2016, BabyCenter’s report stated. Nancy Wheeler’s first name increased 46 percent. Dustin, Lucas and Joyce also jumped up 32 percent, 25 percent and 23 percent, respectively. 


“Walking Dead” names rose as well, with Carol up 18 percent and Hershel up 37 percent. “American Horror Story” saw similar character influence, boosting Iris up 16 percent, Donovan up 3 percent and Lee up 11 percent. 


Luxury Brands



BabyCenter attributes the rise in several baby names to the influence of luxury brands like Cartier (up 77 percent), Dior (up 53 percent), Armani (up 44 percent) and Donatella (up 38 percent).


The name Tesla also rose 18 percent and Lexus jumped up 62 percent. 


Small Screen Favorites



Parents’ love for “Game of Thrones” names persists, as alternate Arya spelling, Aria, reached number eight on BabyCenter’s list of popular girls’ names. Arya actress Maisie Williams’ first name leaped up 33 percent. Sansa is up 46 percent and Brienne is up 4 percent. 


Other TV name trends BabyCenter noted include the “Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt” heroine’s name rising 75 percent, “Orange is the New Black” character Daya’s name up 55 percent and the name Sebastian from “House of Cards” is up 20 percent. 


STEM Inspiration



BabyCenter also found a rise in “science-y names” like Cloud (up 76 percent) and Rocket (up 24 percent). Famous scientists’ names also increased, with Darwin rising 57 percent, Newton up 44 percent and Edison up 25 percent. 


Contemporary tech figures and innovations also influenced the baby naming world, as the name Elon (of Musk fame) is up 41 percent and Cortana (of Microsoft personal assistant fame) is up 36 percent. 


Antiheroes



Hulk alter ego Bruce Banner’s last name is apparently on the rise, as BabyCenter noted in 48 percent rise for Banner. Harley Quinn from “Suicide Squad” also may have influenced baby name trends, with Harley up 35 percent, Harleen up 13 percent and Quinn up five percent. 


For more information on this report, visit BabyCenter.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A 'Hamilton'-Themed Gift Guide For The #HamFan In Your Life

$
0
0

The Hamilton Mixtape” has arrived. And most fans have likely bought or streamed the record in its entirely since the midnight release on Dec. 2. So, assuming the “Hamilton” devotee in your life already has this particular musical gift that keeps on giving, what are you to present him or her this holiday season?


The answer is: one of the following 29 “Hamilton”-themed offerings. From prayer candles to scrappy totes to an Eliza phone case, these are the gifts big and small that any Lin-Manuel Miranda –worshipping man, woman or child would adore. Go forth, Secret Santas, and deliver the most inimitable ― dare we say, the most original ― present out there:



Or, you know, you could get your loved one tickets to go see the show. Your choice.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Kerry James Marshall And The Limitless Power Of Black Paint

$
0
0

In his expansive retrospective spanning 35 years of work, Kerry James Marshall’s paintings range from urban pastorals to Renaissance-inspired portraits, subtly shifting abstractions to romanticized, domestic interiors. Yet regardless of style, substance or setting, the works converge on a single element: the undiluted blackness of their subjects’ flesh. 


The vast majority of paintings that make up the Western art historical canon feature, of course, white subjects. Marshall’s painted world doesn’t only pass over these white subjects, his subjects’ skin features not a single splash of white paint. The artist’s formula for flesh features three shades of black: carbon black, mars black and ivory black. He will occasionally incorporate yellow and blue shades to round out the color, but no one figure in any painting is darker or lighter than another. Each exists outside a spectrum of shading or valuation; black is black.


Blackness is non-negotiable in those pictures,” Marshall explained in an October interview with T Magazine. “It’s also unequivocal — they are black — that’s the thing that I mean for people to identify immediately. They are black to demonstrate that blackness can have complexity. Depth. Richness.”



A breathtaking exhibition featuring 72 of Marshall’s works, titled “Kerry James Marshall: Mastry,” is now on view at the Met Breuer in New York City. The paintings reflect Marshall’s extensive command of Western art history to generate vivid representations of the African-American experience, past and present.


Marshall’s oeuvre is extraordinary in its ability to confront the injustices of art and American history head-on, while still celebrating the power and beauty of blackness. Its tenor contrasts with the rhetoric employed by president-elect Donald Trump, who has described African-Americans as “living in hell,” presenting a combination of optimism and activism that offers not hope but pride and productive vitality. 


Marshall was born in 1955 in Birmingham, Alabama, and relocated with his family to the Los Angeles neighborhood of Watts in 1963, where they lived 12 blocks from the Black Panther headquarters. Growing up, Marshall witnessed many incidents of violence, though these traumatic experiences were scattered among happy memories of a loving family and happy home life, as well as the enchanting impact of art.  


At 10 years old, Marshall visited the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for the first time and was mesmerized by what he encountered. “I went from floor to floor looking at everything, in the same way that in the library I went down the stacks and looked at every art book, without discrimination,” he told The New Yorker. Three years later, he took a summer drawing course at Otis College of Art and Design, where he would later attend art school, becoming the first in his family to go to college. 



From his earliest encounters with art, Marshall was well aware of the dearth of black bodies represented in museum archives. Yet his reaction was not resentment but determination, to master the art historical trajectory that excluded black bodies and expertly incorporate them into it.  


When you talk about the absence of black figure representation in the history of art,” Marshall said to T Magazine, “you can talk about it as an exclusion, in which case there’s a kind of indictment of history for failing to be responsible for something it should have been. I don’t have that kind of mission. I don’t have that indictment. My interest in being a part of it is being an expansion of it, not a critique of it.”


His dizzying array of art at the Met Breuer expands upon the shamefully limited scope of Western art history in myriad ways, too many to recount or even fully digest on a single visit. Yet one room addresses the issue of art history most straightforwardly, with a series of black painters depicted in the midst of creating their self-portraits. 


The mythic artists, both male and female, meet the viewer’s gaze with regal composure and resolute solemnity. Donning sculptural hairstyles and voguish ensembles punctuated by dramatic collars and splashes of color, Marshall’s subjects seem aware of their statuses as works of art themselves. The paintings address the absence of black artists and black subjects simultaneously, while providing fictitious black artists the rare opportunity to depict their own image on their own terms. 


The wall text reads: “The commanding presence of these figures is also an empowering one ― if you are an artist of color or if you are an artist who is a woman, the answer to the question, ‘What does an artist look like?’ might just be you.”



The self-portraits within the paintings, unfinished, rest propped up on easels in the backdrop. Closer examination reveals many of the canvases are paint-by-numbers, a craze popularized in the 1950s. As Holland Cotter wrote in his New York Times review of the exhibition: “It was a type of painting for anyone and everyone, universal in that way. And although the subjects were fixed, the colors were not.”


The paint-by-numbers canvasses implore those who wish to upheave racial bias in the art historical canon to do so by partaking in the universal practice of making art themselves. The activity-book-like format nods to the uncanny relationship between race and color, illuminating how simple it would be and has always been to dip a paintbrush in black paint instead of white. And yet even the painted figures have yet to render their self-portraits in their black likeness, as though even today the act of painting a black subject remains a radical act. 


And yet, of course, Marshall has accomplished said act, over 70 times and counting. The 61-year-old artist, who was awarded the MacArthur Fellowship in 1997, shows up all day, every day, to his studio, where he paints sans assistants from morning until night. 



The fact that Marshall’s retrospective is on view at The Met, of all places, is hugely significant. As Ian Alteveer, the Met curator who organized the exhibition along with Helen Molesworth and Dieter Roelstraete explained to The New York Times: “There are 5,000-plus years of art history here, and that’s the history he wants to be a part of and to paint to be a part of.”


Marshall’s depictions of black creativity and power extend beyond the art studio, depicting barber shops, public housing developments and intimate bedrooms. The retrospective is a remarkable achievement, a testament to Marshall’s knowledge, skill and spirit.


In response to an art historical narrative that failed to represent him, Marshall studied and mastered its shape. And in a composite visual language, weaved from threads of Théodore Géricault and Frank Stella, Giotto and Piet Mondrian, Marshall tells his story, the story of black America. A portrait, a love letter, a celebration, and a battle cry. 


Kerry James Marshall: Mastry” is on view at The Met Breuer until Jan. 29, 2017.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Whatever Happened To Interracial Love?' Asks Questions We're Still Trying To Answer

$
0
0

The title of Kathleen Collins’ posthumous debut short fiction collection holds a tragic timeliness: Whatever Happened to Interracial Love?


Collins, a brilliant and accomplished filmmaker and activist, never published fiction during her lifetime and died in 1988. Her tableaux and vignettes take place decades in the past, yet the question of the title story seems more relevant than ever. With the nation’s first black president yielding the office to the nation’s first president-elect to unapologetically retweet white nationalists, many liberals have been filled with the same disillusionment that swirls through the story ― except Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? is set in 1963, in the midst of the Civil Rights Movement.


“An apartment on the Upper West Side shared by two interracial roommates,” the story begins. “It’s the year of the human being. The year of race-creed-color blindness. It’s 1963.” The white roommate is a community organizer who is in love with a black poet. The black roommate is a freedom rider, in love with a white man she met registering voters in the South. The narrative unfolds through the eyes of the black roommate, who wants to marry her boyfriend despite the sadness of her father, who wanted her to simply graduate from Sarah Lawrence ― where she was the only black woman in her class ― marry a black man and become a teacher. She reads about interracial love, sees it playing out languorously around her, and then sees it slipping through her fingers.


The tantalizing, unfulfilled promise of a “melting pot,” an interracial or even post-racial society, remains a preoccupation many years later, and, again, it has resulted in a painful disappointment. Collins’ impressionistic, psychologically observant collection captures moments from a past era that should remind idealistic readers today that our disillusionment is not new ― it’s been part and parcel of the black community’s battle for civil rights for generations.


Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? is a slim book composed of scenes and monologues; the sort of fiction you might expect a groundbreaking filmmaker to write. The first piece, “Exteriors,” consists of set description and staging directions depicting a couple in their apartment at various points in their relationship; the second, “Interiors,” is a stream-of-consciousness monologue from each partner. In another story, she captures a woman’s heady romance with a man who can’t resist an irresponsible risk. In “Stepping Back,” the narrator contemplates the limits of what even her extensive education and culture can do for her romantically as a black woman.


At every turn, Collins burrows deep into the minds of her characters, mostly black women, and brings to life their daily joys and frustrations as well as their persistent anxieties. The burdens imposed due to race and gender weigh on every line. “When she left home for the summer,” begins the story “How Does One Say,” “her hair was so short her father wouldn’t say goodbye. He couldn’t bear to look at her. She had it cut so short there wasn’t any use straightening it, so it frizzed tight around her head and made her look, in her father’s words, ‘just like any other colored girl.’” In “Interiors,” one half of a now-fractured couple addressed her former partner in an anguished internal monologue: “I began to feel that I was drying out inside, that cold waves were shriveling my breasts, and my limbs began to shriek and sputter. At night you surfaced in my sleep, unbuttoning yourself in front of a diverse sampling of salesgirls, waitresses, go-go dancers, and church deaconesses.”


Collins is a master at setting scenes and inhabiting her characters; plot takes a secondary role in these revelatory vignettes. Instead, the narrative lies in the evolution of the characters’ understanding, a realization that they’ve reached too far, hoped too much or had it wrong the whole time. “That is really all there is to the story,” sums up one narrator, a white man recounting the history of a black family he befriended. “Why do I feel I have told it all wrong? Perhaps because I am not the one to tell it.”


Nearly 30 years after her too-early passing, this author’s powerful debut collection manages to perfectly embody the existential torment of her country. The lingering question of whether we really understand each other and what’s happening around us, or whether we’re getting it catastrophically wrong, looms over Whatever Happened to Interracial Love? ― and it’s a question we’re likely to continue grappling with for many years to come.  


The Bottom Line:


In poignant, searching scenes and contemplations, readers will be reintroduced to a great and under-appreciated creative talent in Kathleen Collins.


What other reviewers think:


The New York Times: “The best of these stories are a revelation. Ms. Collins had a gift for illuminating what the critic Albert Murray called the ‘black intramural class struggle,’ and two or three of her stories are so sensitive and sharp and political and sexy I suspect they will be widely anthologized.”


The New Yorker: “Collins’s style is fine, graceful, and reserved, but pierced with the harsh simplicity of lurking menace.”


Who wrote it?


Kathleen Collins was an African-American playwright, filmmaker and activist. Her 1982 movie “Losing Ground” was one of the first feature films made by an African-American woman. She died at 46, in 1988. Her collection of stories, Whatever Happened to Interracial Love?, has never before been published. 


Who will read it?


Readers who enjoy short, vignette fiction and reading drama.


Opening lines:


“Okay, it’s a sixth-floor walk-up, three rooms in the front, bathtub in the kitchen, roaches on the walls, a cubbyhole of a john with a stained-glass window. The light? They’ve got light up the butt! It’s the tallest building on the block, facing nothin’ but rooftops and sun. Okay, let’s light it for night. I want a spot on that big double bed that takes up most of the room. And a little one on that burlap night table. Okay, now like that worktable with all those notebooks and papers and stuff. Good. And put a spot on those pillows made up to look like a couch. Good. Now let’s have a nice soft gel on the young man composing his poems or reading at his worktable. And another soft one for the young woman standing by the stove killing roaches.” 


Notable passage:


“I’m not trying to flatter myself, but I was the first colored woman he ever seriously considered loving. I know I was. The first one who had the kind of savoir faire he believed in so devoutly. The first one with class, style, poetry, taste, elegance, repartee, and haute cuisine. Because, you know, a colored woman with class is still an exceptional creature; and a colored woman with class, style, poetry, taste, elegance, repartee, and haute cuisine is an almost nonexistent species. The breeding possibilities are slight.”


Whatever Happened to Interracial Love?
By Kathleen Collins
Ecco, $15.99
Publishes Dec. 6


The Bottom Line is a weekly review combining plot description and analysis with fun tidbits about the book.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

12 Baby Name Ideas Inspired By This Season's Biggest Movies

$
0
0

Somewhere between roasting the turkey and trimming the tree, millions of us also find time to go to the movies. After all, there’s a new Marvel superhero, a Disney heroine, more than one outer space adventure, plenty of promising indie hits, plus installments in the Star Wars and Harry Potter universes. Who could stay away?


The blockbuster season features a bounty of baby name possibilities, from the old-fashioned to the brand new. Could one of these movies launch the next big baby name trends. Pass the popcorn, and let’s take a look at the contenders. 


Callum


Video game “Assassin’s Creed” comes to the big screen this season. Instead of long-time game hero Desmond, we’re introduced to Callum. He’s a career criminal who discovers he’s descended from a 15th century assassin. Popular elsewhere in the English-speaking world for years, Callum is slowly starting to catch on in the U.S. 


Aurora


Jennifer Lawrence has faced all sorts of peril on the big screen. In “Passengers,” she’s aboard a space ship with Chris Pratt, answering to the appropriately celestial Aurora. Trivia note: actress Aurora Perrineau, daughter of actor Harold, also appears in the movie, as Celeste. Aurora entered the U.S. top 100 baby names list this year and with another boost, could be headed even higher.


Credence


“Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” takes place in Harry Potter’s wizarding world, but seven decades earlier. “Beasts” brings British wizard Newt Scamander to Depression-era New York. He meets the deeply troubled Credence. The name feels antique, but Credence has never been used in significant numbers.


Moana


With a star-studded voice cast, a winning story, and a soundtrack featuring music by Lin-Manuel Miranda, how can Disney’s “Moana” miss? The heroine’s name means “ocean” in most Polynesian languages. Not every Disney princess name inspires, but parents love vowel-heavy names and nature themes, so maybe Moana is the logical sister to Kai.


Dorothy


Speaking of space, “Hidden Figures” tells the true story of three African-American women mathematicians who were part of the NASA team calculating John Glenn’s history-making space flight. Dorothy Vaughn is played by Oscar winner Octavia Spencer. After slowly inching up the charts in recent years, could this send Dorothy soaring?


Darian


Coming-of-age movie “The Edge of Seventeen” focuses on teenaged Nadine, and her BFF Krista. But the stand-out name belongs to Nadine’s older brother, Darian. It’s never been common but might fit right in with popular picks like Adrian and Julian. Darian also brings to mind overlooked Darius, the name of an ancient Persian king.


Gardner


We’ll have to wait until early 2017 for “The Space Between Us,” the story of a really long-distance romance. She’s on Earth, but he’s the first human born on Mars. Asa Butterfield’s character answers to the handsome Gardner. It’s a surname name with a dose of the outdoors, a promising combination. Another standout character name from the movie? Tulsa.


Louise


Surely Louise is set to return to the U.S. Top 1000 soon! Amy Adams answers to the classic name in “Arrival.” She’s a linguist sent to communicate with aliens who arrive on Earth. Louise ranked in the U.S. top 100 into the 1940s, but hasn’t charted in 25 years. With other Lou- names, like Lucy and Luna, in vogue, Louise just makes sense.”


Marianne


Brad Pitt’s first post-split movie debut is “Allied.” He plays a spy married to a spy ― who might be a double agent. Marion Cotillard plays his is-she/isn’t-she wife, Marianne. The World War II thriller features an appealing list of names, like Bridget and Emmanuel. French, literary, and romantic Marianne has been overlooked in the U.S. for decades. Could 2017 be its year?


Jacqueline


Jacqueline ranked in the U.S. top 100 for seven decades, from the 1920s onward. It’s synonymous with former First Lady Jacqueline “Jackie” Kennedy, later Onassis. Now Natalie Portman is donning the signature pillbox hat in a new biopic. But will it increase interest in the classic name? With Genevieve and Madeleine in favor, why not?


Nicodemus


“Doctor Strange” is already a hit, featuring acclaimed actor Benedict Cumberbatch as surgeon-turned-superhero Dr. Stephen Strange. Will the movie reverse Stephen’s slide? Or will ancient Nicodemus, the name of Strange’s rival, finally attract some attention? With built-in nicknames Nico and Nick, it seems rich with potential.


Cassian


Star Wars movies come with memorable names, and “Rogue One” upholds the tradition. This new story features Diego Luna as Cassian Andor, a veteran member of the Rebel Alliance, serving as guide to young Jyn Erso as they attempt to steal the plans for the Death Star. Other intriguing names from the blockbuster include Orson, Lyra, Bodhi, Galen, and, of course, Jyn. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


NYC Gay Men's Chorus Members Pay Homage To 'The Golden Girls'

$
0
0



The handsome stars of Tonewall visited “That Golden Girls Show! A Puppet Parody” in New York last month to perform their version of a classic tune we all know and love. 


The puppet incarnations of Dorothy, Blanche, Sophia and Rose look positively delighted to be serenaded by the men as they croon Andrew Gold’s “Thank You For Being A Friend,” which was played during the opening credits of “The Golden Girls,” which ran from 1985 through 1992. 


That Golden Girls Show! A Puppet Parody,” which opened Oct. 3 at New York’s DR2 Theatre, recasts Miami’s fab foursome as fuzzy, “Sesame Street”-style marionettes. On Dec. 1, the show got a “holiday edition” makeover, incorporating a few seasonal twists that should delight diehard “Golden Girls” fans. 


Featuring 11 members of the New York City Gay Men’s Chorus, Tonewall is best known for putting a unique, a capella spin on pop favorites. You can check out a few of their amazing performances here, here and here


Head here for more details on “That Golden Girls Show! A Puppet Parody.” 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Instagram Account Posts Pics Of Nipples For The Sake Of Nipple Equality

$
0
0

Warning: This post contains lots of close-up shots of nipples. If you don’t like it, don’t look. 



You can't touch us

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on




Nipples: Everyone has them. Only some of us get to show them on Instagram.


Instagram’s policy on nudity ― which permits men’s but not women’s nips ― has plagued the internet since the advent of the photo sharing app as a censorship double standard, one that artists have not hesitated to point out in the past. 


For many, the frustration stems not just from the policy itself, but what it suggests: that women’s bodies are inherently sexual, obscene, in need of policing. Not to mention that art history is a rich jungle of naked bodies ― from Renaissance nudes to feminist conceptual photographs ― and not being able to share them online is a major bummer. 


A new Instagram account called “Genderless Nipples” is out to save Instagram from its own BS, posting close-ups of the soft and perky nipples of people of all genders. The brainchild of students Morgan-Lee Wagner, Evelyne Wyss, and Marco Russo, the project shows that regardless of what gender you identify with, a nipple is a nipple ― sensitive, lumpy, fuzzy and strange! 



We already survived one week!

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on




In an email to The Huffington Post, the minds behind “Genderless Nipples” explained how the project was triggered by the recent presidential campaigns. “During that period, so many horrible things were said by candidates, and their supporters, about woman rights and gender equality, that we decided we should do something about it,” they wrote. “And what better way to start spreading a message of gender equality than pointing out the rules of social networks?”


While nipple inequality is perhaps not the most pressing manifestation of sexism in our country today, it’s one of the few that can actually be addressed productively on social media itself. After beginning the project with nip pics donated by their colleagues and friends, the OPs invited anonymous individuals to email their own photos for posting. 


Wagner, Wyss and Russo agree that gender politics are evolving and Instagram needs to wake up and keep up. “No matter people’s gender, everybody should be treated equally,” they said. “We are not against the rules, but we think rules should be applied to all genders equally. Society is changing and it’s time for the rules to follow this behavior.”


Or more lightly put, as expressed in one of their comments: “They’re just nipples! And we love them!”


Do you have a nipple, or even two? Send those fleshy knobs to genderlessnipples@gmail.com to help close the nipple gap on Instagram once and for all! 



My body is no democracy, it's an empire and i'm its dictator.

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





We are all born so beautiful. The tragedy is being convinced that we're not. -Rupi Kaur ☄️

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





I am no longer accepting the things I cannot change, I am changing the things I cannot accept!

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





Life is too short! Always stand out!

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





In the womb we develop nipples before our genitals. Did you know?

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





They're just nipples! And we love them!

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on





Dear Instagram, why don’t you try to figure out which pictures you can and cannot delete? Good luck.

A photo posted by Genderless Nipples (@genderlessnipples) on



-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Largest Ever All-Female Expedition Sets Sail For Antarctica

$
0
0

The largest ever all-female expedition to Antarctica set sail today from Argentina, with 76 scientists on board.


In a quest to “promote women in science and highlight the impact of climate change on the planet,” the Homeward Bound initiative hopes to increase women’s representation in science jobs around the world.





Co-founder Fabian Dattner told Reuters that she and her partner, Dr. Jessica Melbourne-Thomas, decided to set up the initiative after hearing a group of polar scientists joking that candidates had to have a beard to land a leadership role in Antarctic science.


“The message of Homeward Bound is to bring together this intelligent, capable group of women who are not seen, not recognized, and in large part somewhat sidelined,” Dattner told Reuters.


Dattner went on to say that many scientists on the expedition have experienced some form of sexual harassment, discrimination and misogyny in their careers.




Each of the 76 women involved were selected from a group of more than a thousand applicants, all with critical science backgrounds, and their mission is observe the effect of climate change in Antarctica over the course of 20 days.


Lectures, leadership workshops, and networking opportunities will also be available while they’re at sea.





Ordinarily, the expeditions Homeward Bound plans to undertake will be a year-long, but the inaugural program ― which focuses on the leadership of women and the state of the world ― will be from Dec. 2-21, according to their website.


“We’re missing half the voice at the leadership table,” co-founder Dr. Melbourne-Thomas told the BBC. “For various reasons it can be difficult for women to get to Antarctica or the Arctic. Homeward Bound came out of discussions around that … and the lack of representation of women in science.”




Each participant is paying for her own travel and accommodation on the voyage, and the expedition is privately funded. Dr. Melbourne-Thomas indicated that the reason the expedition is leaving from Argentina is because leaving from Australian’s Tasmania state wasn’t possible without government funding.


This trip is particularly momentous considering that women make up only 28 percent of the world’s researchers and are particularly underrepresented at senior levels, according to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO).


“Mother Nature needs her daughters,” said Dattner.


We couldn’t agree more. Applications for a 2018 expedition open on January 17th, 2017 and according to the site there are already hundreds of women wait-listed.


How’s that for girl power?

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Doing Just One Creative Task Each Day Will Make You Happier, Study Says

$
0
0

Grumpy humans of the world, listen here. According to a new University of Otago study published in the Journal of Positive Psychology, the path to that happy state of mind you’ve heard so much about requires you get creative ― quite literally, and just once a day. 


So you’re not the next Picasso. Same. But flexing your creative muscles doesn’t have to mean preparing an oeuvre for your eventual solo show. A creative exercise can take the shape of anything from kitting to writing to singing to designing. All that matters is that you choose a creative goal for yourself and follow through, something that involves expressing original ideas in a useful or artistic way. 


While many recent psychological studies have explored the impact of one’s emotional state on the quality of the artwork they produce, researchers Tamlin S. Conner, Colin G. DeYoung, and Paul J. Silvia sought to investigate the inverse. 


There is growing recognition in psychology research that creativity is associated with emotional functioning,” Dr. Conner explained in a statement. “However, most of this work focuses on how emotions benefit or hamper creativity, not whether creativity benefits or hampers emotional wellbeing.”







To test their hypothesis, psychologists conducted a 13-day study of a sample of 658 young adults to gauge the effect of creative activity on one’s emotional state of mind.


Every day, the participants used a diary to document how much time they spent on creative exercises and the emotional changes they experienced, both positive and negative, as a result. Researchers used the term “PA,” or “positive affect,” to refer to feelings of happiness, joy, excitement and enthusiasm they encountered. 


After 13 days, the psychologists tracked what they described as an “upward spiral for wellbeing and creativity” for those who partook in daily creative tasks. According to the study, getting artistic yields a major boost in “PA” that takes hold the following day.


The study also analyzed participants on something called a “flourishing scale,” which asked them to rank their responses to statements like “Today I was interested and engaged in my daily activities,” and “Today my social relationships were supportive and rewarding.” These rankings, too, increased with heightened creative action, suggesting that art’s positive impact can affect your work day flow and your relationship too. 


However, researchers determined no “cross-day effect” between creative activities and “PA,” meaning that one’s increased mood could not predict whether or not the subject would participate in another creative exercise the same day. Dr. Conner and her co-researchers expressed that it is, though not predictable, rather likely. As they put it: “engaging in creative behavior leads to increases in wellbeing the next day, and this increased wellbeing is likely to facilitate creative activity on the same day.”


The results reflect what many aspiring writers, artists and performers already know: getting creative feels good, and those positive effects can and do seep into other aspects of daily life. Also, happy feelings could inspire you to make more art. So start a sketchbook, get crafting, dance around in your underwear ― anything to get your imagination pumping and your senses pulsing. And we mean today. 







Related: Study Says Making Art Reduces Stress, Even If You Kind Of Suck At It 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Moms Break Down Breastfeeding Stigma With Ethereal Photos

$
0
0

Over the past three years, photographer Ivette Ivens has turned her lens to a special group of subjects: breastfeeding mothers.


Ivens ― who has two sons, ages 2 and 5 ― told The Huffington Post her own breastfeeding experience inspired her to photograph these intimate moments. “I realized how divine and powerful a woman is, and I had to capture it with my camera,” she said. 



The photographer conducts her breastfeeding shoots in people’s homes and against stunning natural landscapes like beaches, forests and fields. The effect is often very ethereal. 


“When I started taking these photos, I learned a lot,” Ivens said. “For some women breastfeeding does not come easy, so they go an extra mile to do it. I’ve shot breastfeeding women who have diabetes, conceived their baby via a surrogate, have extremely busy work schedule, etc.”



Ivens said she hopes her photos can help break down the stigma around breastfeeding in public. “I believe that the more people look at these photos, the more they’ll understand that breastfeeding is a natural thing, and it’s nothing to be ashamed of,” she said. “I want people to become comfortable with this.”


The photographer has compiled some of her work into a book called Breastfeeding Goddesses. She said she’s currently working on a second edition. 


Keep scrolling to see more of Ivens’ breastfeeding photos. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

In The Year's Best Movie, Jackie Kennedy Writes Her Own History

$
0
0

Once a theme is implanted into the nebulous zeitgeist of history, it is hard to accept revision. We favor tidy packages and finite answers, no matter how illusory the truth may be. Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy is the perfect case study. Often reduced to a housewife whose signature contribution to American culture were the clothes she wore, Kennedy may be the 20th century’s most enigmatic luminary, despite being among its most dissected. In 1995, cultural critic Wayne Koestenbaum published an entire book about Jackie Kennedy’s unknowability, as seen through the prism of our collective infatuation. “The ability to rearrange Jackie has made it easy to fictionalize her,” he wrote.


The new film “Jackie” threatens to upend the mythology surrounding this former first lady. Opening in limited release this weekend, Pablo Larraín’s unconventional psychodrama portrays the immediate aftermath of John F. Kennedy’s 1963 assassination as a tightrope walk. Played by Natalie Portman in a career-defining performance, Jackie carries an unsettling mix of fragility ― one more step and she may combust ― and unflappable dexterity. She had, after all, lived her adult life as a public figure with limited agency, part of the first political clan to be defined by television. When she lost a third child three months before her husband’s death, Jackie left the hospital to the click-click-click of cameras. After the assassination, when the Kennedy advisers suggested she exit from the rear of Air Force One to avoid the press, Jackie refused. “Let them see what they’ve done,” she says in the film, referring to the bloodstains on her famous pink Chanel suit and pillbox hat.


Once “Jackie” began shooting, Larraín decided to telegraph the first lady’s misfortune through her expressions, which always seemed to conceal something that Jackie wouldn’t reveal. On the first day, the Chilean director of “No” and “The Club,” who was handpicked by Darren Aronofsky to take over the project after Aronofsky’s exit, kept moving the camera nearer and nearer to Portman. 


“It was grief and pain and people saying things and bullets and asphalts and Kennedys and families and funerals,” Larraín said, ticking off the revelations in Portman’s eyes during a conversation with The Huffington Post in October. 



Larraín and his cinematographer, Stéphane Fontaine, filmed “Jackie” predominately in extreme close-ups. When Jackie wipes her husband’s blood from her face, the shot is so tight that she is bursting out of the frame, as though her trauma is too heavy for the camera to absorb. At times the camera seems anxious to draw away from her, and yet it cannot. Her experience is too transfixing.


“We are seeing this movie not just from her perspective, but through her eyes,” Larraín said. “And they’re the eyes of a mother. This is the story of a mother.”


Therein lies another item on the laundry list of Jackie Kennedy lore. Scripted by author and “Today” show executive Noah Oppenheim, “Jackie” interweaves several chapters of its subject’s life: the 1962 televised White House tour (in which she showed off her heavily criticized restoration efforts), the assassination itself, the funeral arrangements in the few days that followed, an intimate conversation with a priest about death and grief, and the Life magazine interview where, one week after JFK’s murder, Jackie planted the Camelot analogy that still pervades the Kennedy mythos. Sprinkled throughout each chapter is the heartbreaking role her two children, 5-year-old Caroline and 2-year-old John Jr., play in the tragedy. 


Before she tells the children about their father’s death, Jackie nervously turns to assistant and confidant Nancy Tuckerman (a sweet Greta Gerwig). “How do I do this?” the new widow pleads. And then, like clockwork, Jackie turns, walks into the room where Caroline and John Jr. are playing, and puts on the same brave face she bore for the public throughout ongoing political and marital travails. She needed no help in deciding what to say. As Portman portrays her, Jackie remains the consummate performer, the children her devoted audience. She dismisses her personal despair to soothe the young ones, as though it, like so many regrettable things, is her job. 



In the first “Jackie” cut, editor Sebastián Sepúlveda used only extreme close-ups. He then interspersed the film with wider shots so viewers could understand its settings. That horrific intimacy ― a “hypnotic approach,” as Sepúlveda described it ― gives “Jackie” the scope of a psychological thriller, like a nightmare ensconced in what we perceive to be history. Mica Levi’s dissonant score doubles the film’s intensity. 


But the finest achievement in “Jackie” is its firmness in ascribing the Kennedy legacy’s creation to this scrutinized widow, from JFK’s notorious assignations to his governmental cachet. In a come-to-Jesus discussion with Bobby Kennedy (Peter Sarsgaard), Jackie worries future annals will deny JFK glorification because his accomplishments in office were curtailed. From there, she confirms his funeral should be a pageant similar to that of Abraham Lincoln, the most memorialized of America’s slain presidents. Between that spectacle and the Camelot imagery, Jackie Kennedy persuaded the world to immortalize her husband as a dignitary. Once American royalty, always American royalty. 


“I read a lot of stuff and I talked to a lot of people, and no one knows who she really was in this country,” Larraín said. “She’s unreadable. Forget it. That mystery is so beautiful because it makes you think and feel things that are not being said.”


If anyone has a read on Jackie Kennedy, it is Portman. The register of Portman’s voice rises and falls depending on Jackie’s performativity at any given moment. Confidence and fear operate in tandem. Most importantly, Jackie is a student of history, as well as a skeptic of it. She knows that, with the entire planet watching, she alone can shape the Kennedy endowments. And so, in 95 haunting minutes ― the best 95 minutes on the big screen this year ― we watch as she falls apart but keeps everything around her in check. We watch as she rewrites history.


“I believe the characters we read about on the page end up being more real than the men who stand beside us,” she tells the Life reporter (Billy Crudup). The movie confirms her hypothesis. 


“Jackie” is now playing in select theaters. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Holy Hogwarts, 'Harry Potter And The Cursed Child' Is Headed To Broadway

$
0
0

While Americans worked to make sense of last month’s election results, real-life magical being J.K. Rowling provided her readers, young and old, with wisdom and guidance, both through her beloved stories and her take-no-bulls**t tweets. 


And now, just when many of us were wishing we could take a four-year nap, Rowling yet again shines a light, giving American “Harry Potter” lovers something big to look forward to: “Harry Potter and the Cursed Child” is heading to Broadway.


Until now, the ability to see the eighth chapter of the “Harry Potter” series, which takes the form of a play, was only available to those in and around the U.K.’s West End. Yet Pottermore announced on Thursday that Harry, Hermione and the gang would be coming to New York’s Lyric Theatre in Spring 2018. 







The show, written by Jack Thorne, picks up where the epilogue of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows left off. Most of the former Hogwarts students we know and love are now adults, sending their little witches and wizards in training off to school. The script is based off a story created by Thorne, J.K. Rowling and John Tiffany, who is the show’s director. 


“Harry Potter and the Cursed Child” is slated to take over the cavernous Lyric theater space, which is currently home to the first-ever Cirque du Soleil Broadway show “Paramour.” The “Cursed Child” producers, however, are looking to completely remodel the theater’s interior, ensuring the space is intimate yet capable of accommodating a large audience, so that fans can afford reasonably priced tickets. (Take note, “Hamilton”!) 


London’s hugely popular production of the “Cursed Child” will continue to run concurrently with the American iteration. As of now, casting for the Broadway show has not been determined. Actors of NYC, start practicing your British accents and wingardium leviosa moves now. 







H/T New York Times

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Massive Cedar Sculpture Sent A Dozen FBI Workers To The Hospital

$
0
0

More than a million taxpayer dollars went toward installing ― and then removing ― a 15,000-pound cedar sculpture at the FBI’s field office in Miami after at least a dozen workers became seriously ill.


Last year, the General Services Administration, which leases office space to federal agencies, commissioned artist Ursula von Rydingsvard to create Cedrus, a 17-foot western red cedar sculpture. The structure, made of 30 individual pieces imported from Vancouver, resembled a massive tornado. 


It certainly did some damage.




Cedrus looked impressive, but it soon began to make workers sick. According to documents obtained by Politico, the installation’s cedar dust triggered allergic reactions ― with the office’s only nurse suffering one of the worst.


“Upon the installation of the art sculpture, the nurse developed rhinitis, difficulty swallowing, sinus pressure, sneezing, has difficulty breathing and began to itch all over,” read a June 2015 internal FBI letter that Politico obtained. 


A different employee’s “face became very swollen,” and another was hospitalized for 11 days.


The sculpture was removed months later and now sits in a storage facility in Maryland. The GSA “deep cleaned” the office spaces after wrapping Cedrus in plastic, the agency told Gizmodo.


GSA officials initially believed the sculpture was “worth more” than the $750,000 it paid, according to the internal documents. But it cost an estimated $412,000 to remove the sculpture, and ultimately cost taxpayers $1.2 million.


Maybe next time, try pine. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

13 Perfect Gifts For Unapologetically Proud Latino Men

$
0
0

If you’re dreading giving the Latino men in your life a cologne for the fifth year in a row, it’s time to explore more creative alternatives. 


Whether he’d loved to make a political statement with a “bad hombre” money clip or show off his language skills with a “Fluent in Spanglish” cap, here are over a dozen ways to avoid having to buy yet another bottle of Polo Red.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

29 Gifts For The Asian Food-Obsessed Friend In Your Life

$
0
0

We’re pretty sure it was Buddy the Elf who once said that the best way to spread Christmas cheer is making naan for all to share.


OK, well even if he didn’t say exactly that, you probably have a friend who would. You know ― the Asian food-obsessed one who’s always ready to hunt down the juiciest pork buns or make homemade samosas. So we’ve collected some gadgets, snacks, apparel and home decor items that only this foodie friend would eat up. 


So here are 29 wok-in’ gifts for the Asian food aficionado in your life. And let’s be real ― the goal here is to get them to cook for you, right? That’s our idea of holiday cheer.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How The Internet Gave Birth To 'Troll Politics' And President-Elect Trump

$
0
0



The internet is often hailed as a place where marginalized communities can have a platform and circumvent traditional media gatekeepers to make their voices heard. But according to author Caitlin Moran, the web also has a more insidious side, and with President-elect Donald Trump’s political rise, it may have just reared its ugly head. 


Moran, the author of the new book Moranifesto, stopped by The Huffington Post Tuesday to discuss how the internet may have helped fuel the loud, populist politics that drove Britain’s exit from the European Union and the election of Trump.


One of the biggest problems with the current state of the internet, Moran noted, is that its gatekeepers don’t reflect the diversity of its users. Instead, the dominance of young men on the web resembles “California during the Gold Rush.”


“If you look at the structure of the way that it is, like 92 percent of coders are male. So this is a male environment,” she told HuffPost’s Alex Berg. “It’s mainly young. There aren’t any tribal elders on there who can go, ‘We’ve seen this before. Calm down.’ It’s a very hostile place for women and people from the LGBT community and people of color.” 


This problematic issue is compounded by the fact that internet harassment is rarely treated as “real” harassment. Internet abuse is often dismissed, despite the fact that the web impacts almost every aspect of our lives and plays a very real role in everything from entertainment to politics today. 


“Its a place that dictates the way that we talk and deal with our problems and it has absolutely, logically, clearly resulted in this world where we’re now gaming politics,” Moran said. “It’s just about shouting. This is the era of the troll. This is troll politics. Brexit. Trump.”


Today, the online phenomenon Moran discussed has very real-world implications. Hate crimes spiked after the Brexit vote, a pattern that also emerged in the U.S. after Trump won the presidential election. 


“This dream world we’ve got on the internet, we’ve now ported this over into real life,” Moran said.   


Hear more from Caitlin Moran in the video above and check out her full interview here

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Students Offer Touching Take On Christmas Classic During Tornado Warning

$
0
0

During a tornado warning in Bremen, Georgia, high school students decided to calm each other’s nerves with a moving take on a classic Christmas song.


On Wednesday, Jessica Pruitt Labbe, a science teacher at Bremen High School posted a video of students singing “Mary, Did You Know?” a cappella. According to Labbe, it was a mix of show choir students and other students who took part in the sing-along.


“Of course students were nervous and people were worried,” she said. “So all of the sudden one of the students just started singing.”





Labbe said “it was like a calm came over the hallway” as the students sang. She clarified that this was the second one the students actually performed during the tornado warning and that as soon as they finished singing, the assistant principal announced on the intercom that the school was clear and students could return to class.


The video, which has been viewed more than 228,000 times as of Friday, also earned the students some time with Mark Lowry, the writer of the song. On Thursday, he wrote on Facebook that he “can’t wait to meet these students.”


Round of applause for the talented singers.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images