Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

Artist Howard Lee's Stunning Hyperrealistic Drawings Will Make You Question Reality

$
0
0



Can you spot the real from the two-dimensional? When it comes to Howard Lee’s stunning artwork, that can be a tall order indeed.


Lee, a England-based artist known for his mind-boggling hyperrealistic drawings, first captured the world’s attention last year with a video of two hot dogs -- one real and one drawn. In the clip, he uses a knife to smash the edible version, thus revealing the difference between the two:




Since then, Lee has been creating similarly confusing works of art, featuring everyday objects and food items like Coke cans, a McDonald’s meal and balloons.












“You start with a few sketchy lines and then everything after that is a ‘spot the difference,’” Lee told Mashable about his drawing process. “You compare the differences and correct them. For hyperrealistic art you just don't stop that process until you've created an illusion of sorts. With my own work it's important that reality and drawing look the same from the perspective of a camera so there's quite a process of checking/comparing for me there.”


Lee told the outlet that he “enjoys drawing anything that confuses the eye,” though he gravitates towards food.


“I don't know why,” he said. “Perhaps they are just everyday and plain so I guess that contributes to the illusion. You don't expect anything odd to happen with such common objects.”


Scroll down to see some of Lee’s mind-bending drawings. Or visit his website and Instagram page for a more complete collection of his work.


And remember to heed Lee's warning: “Don't believe your eyes. They lie.” 












-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












Colorful Architecture, Because You Don't Need Rain For A Breathtaking Rainbow

$
0
0

Gone Daddy Gone pt. 2 #whpwonderland

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on




In nature, a rainbow -- as in the meteorological phenomenon caused by reflection, refraction and dispersion of light in water droplets -- is hard to spot. However, thanks to the colorful intrusions of architecture, shipping containers, and the occasional ferris wheel, rainbows pop up all the time, for those who take notice. 


Yener Torun is a photographer and amateur rainbow hunter, photographing the happy moments when sky and building transform into a flat abstract canvas buzzing with color and energy. Capturing the many moments reminiscent of a Mondrian painting IRL, Torun reveals that the magic of a precious spectrum of light can be harnessed by looking at the buildings all around you. 


Get a taste of all the rainbows in the images below.



[Forbidden Fruit] #WHPmakebelieve

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Under Surveillance

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Wait for the Summer

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Assembly Point

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





That Famous Song (a.k.a. The Plastic Rainbow) #WHPmakebelieve

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Photo Finish

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Contradiction

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Rubik's 3.1

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Ella pt.2

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Nine on Nine

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Common Fate

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Over the Rainbow Under the Clouds

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





ID

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Maestro

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Think Tank

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on







I Am What I Am

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





Futile Devices

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on





In The Mouth Of Madness

A photo posted by Yener Torun (@cimkedi) on



-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Speaking Out About Rape Is Scary. For Some Writers, Fiction Can Help.

$
0
0

“The first person to tell me I was gang-raped was a therapist, seven years after the fact,” novelist Jessica Knoll wrote in an essay for Lena Dunham and Jenni Konner’s newsletter, Lenny Letter.


It’s a heartrending statement, one that makes our culture’s tendency to ignore or undermine rape victims clear. As a consequence, repressed emotions, shame and denial are common responses to the crime. Understanding what happened to oneself as rape can be harrowing or impossible when similar acts aren’t publicly discussed as such; it’s no wonder Knoll was unsure. But, the recent groundswell of women publicly announcing that they were sexually assaulted gave her confidence. What happened to her was rape, even if her peers at the time refused to label it as such.


Knoll's essay detailing her rape and her attempts to process it is especially powerful in light of her debut novel, Luckiest Girl Alive, which deals with similar themes. The book’s protagonist, Ani, is gang-raped and publicly humiliated at a young, impressionable age. She seeks an indirect sort of revenge by living an outwardly impressive life, but learns that glamour can’t stand in for intrinsic peace. In the book’s dedication, Knoll wrote, “To all the TifAni FaNellis of the world, I know,” prompting fans to ask whether the author had endured the same hardships as her heroine. Until recently, she claimed she hadn’t, or was evasive.


“I’ve been running and I’ve been ducking and I’ve been dodging because I’m scared,” Knoll wrote on Lenny Letter. “I’m scared people won’t call what happened to me rape because for a long time, no one did.”


In the essay, she rehashes her attempt to confront one of the boys who raped her. The next day, “trash slut” was scrawled across her locker. Terrified, she apologized to him, and never referred to the crime as rape again, until writing the piece for Lenny. Instead, she created a character who had endured similar traumas. Perhaps because she felt unsafe or unsure discussing her own rape, Knoll -- like many other authors who have been victims -- turned to fiction first.




Processing hardships as though they’re happening to someone else can be a way of tapping into your own stored-away emotions.



Recounting one’s rape through the perspective of a fictional character is an understandable first step toward coming forward. As with other traumatic events, rape can lead to disassociation as a coping mechanism. Processing hardships as though they’re happening to someone else can be a way of tapping into your own stored-away emotions. As with teens exploring alternatives to heterosexuality through fan fiction, writers who explore the emotions they harbor about being raped can similarly do so safely in their imaginary, constructed worlds. But, psychologists maintain this isn’t a permanent solution; coming to grips with your own association to an imagined counterpart is an important part of healing.


Another author known for penning a novel about rape, Laurie Halse Anderson, has said the experience described was taken from her own life. In Speak, a young victim stops talking altogether. It’s arguably a metaphor for Anderson’s hardships. In an interview with Hello Giggles, the author said, “I didn’t tell anybody, I didn’t speak up for almost 25 years, when I wrote the book.”


After Speak’s publication, Anderson began touring the country, talking with young people about her book and its connection with her own life. She recalls a girl she met telling her, “I didn’t know it was possible to be OK after that.” She’s now able to speak bluntly about rape, but fiction was the first avenue into plain-spoken discussion. Once compelled to be silent, she now has the confidence to be heard.


The theme of silence resonates throughout Knoll’s essay, too. “I was 15 years old and aching for guidance and protection, for someone to release the mute button on my voice,” she wrote. “What was the point in raising my voice when all it got me was my own lonely echo?”


Loneliness, fear, shame. When rape survivors speak out after a period of silence, their rationale for keeping quiet typically involves these words. When Kesha spoke out about her alleged date rape, she said she was “too scared” to go to the police. A thoroughly reported piece on The Cut about women who had been assaulted by Bill Cosby was headlined “I’m No Longer Afraid.”


Who, or what, are these women afraid of? The men who assaulted them, certainly, but also public scrutiny or disbelief. Unfortunately, their fears of the latter are founded. When Lena Dunham wrote about being raped in an essay in her book, Not That Kind of Girl, backlash ensued. Much of the negative response arose from her use of a pseudonym and character description that closely matched an actual man named Barry, who, like her alleged rapist, went to Oberlin College and was an active Republican on campus. He felt his reputation was tarnished, and threatened to sue.


Instead of calling into question the effective or appropriate avenues for discussing rape, the incident caused a rush of readers to protest Dunham herself as an exhibitionist. She was labeled a “proven liar” and “rape-hoaxer” by Breitbart, demonstrating that writing about rape in a nonfiction context means running the risk of a hearty public shaming.


Roxane Gay, a novelist and essayist who has written about rape in both mediums, has discussed the rough waters of nonfiction-writing backlash. In an essay titled “The Danger of Disclosure,” she wrote about her readers’ response to a piece on language and sexual violence. “The main question people asked -- via email, at readings, and even at a writing conference, in a bar -- was, ‘Were you raped?’ I hated the curiosity about the details of my past, the deeply private details that are mine and no one else’s,” Gay wrote. “At the same time, certain kinds of nonfiction invite such questions.”


So, speaking out straightforwardly can lead to prodding questions, disbelief, accusations, and further harassment. Meanwhile, the world of fiction allows a rape survivor to address her pain broadly, impersonally, sometimes even artfully. In these stories, there’s reflection and resolve. Rape is a thing that can be solved; it becomes a manageable, tangible thing. It may not be an antidote, but it’s a start.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Artist Fighting To Free Son Uses Her Work To Draw Attention To Incarceration Epidemic

$
0
0

The brushstrokes in Sheila Phipps' paintings tell the story of a broken criminal justice system in Louisiana -- a state notorious for having the highest incarceration rate in the world.


It's a mission that Phipps, a visual artist who's been painting since the 1980s, took up after her son, McKinley "Mac" Phipps, a former No Limit hip-hop artist, was sentenced to 30 years in prison for a 2000 nightclub shooting.


"My son was wrongfully convicted in 2001 and is now serving time for a crime he didn't commit," Sheila Phipps said.


The visual artist said that in the beginning she could barely face the pain of her son spending such a large portion of his life behind bars. To cope, she went to her art room, took a brush in hand, and in a series of meticulous strokes captured the element missing from her life -- her son -- on canvas.


"I was frustrated, and it helped me deal with the stress of everything," Phipps told The Huffington Post.





When Phipps finished the painting of her son, she initially viewed it as a personal accomplishment. After all, it was intended to be therapeutic -- a brief escape from the harsh reality of the situation. However, an emptiness remained. It prompted her to capture not only her son's story but also those of other inmates in Louisiana who are in similar situations.


"I knew my son was not the only one who was a victim of the criminal justice system," she said. "So I started to research other cases where individuals were convicted with questionable evidence or received excessive sentences."


Phipps said her son ultimately became the inspiration behind her series of portraits of incarcerated men. Although she never intended her personal expression for public view, she gradually began showing her paintings as they emerged, gathering them in a series titled "Injustice Xhibition."


The exhibit features seven incarcerated men: McKinley "Mac" Phipps Jr., Warren Scott III, Jerome "Skee" Smith, Earl Truvia, Stanley Stirgus, Rogers LaCaze Sr., and Jamil Joyner. 



"I needed to do something to shed some light on the criminal justice system," Phipps said. "The portraits I paint reflect the realities and problems of mass incarceration."


The 58-year-old artist, who was mostly self-taught, has lived in Louisiana her entire life and paints out of a small room in the back of her house in Meraux.


Critics have praised her works, which she has exhibited throughout Louisiana. The late Sandra Berry, who ran the Neighborhood Gallery, a New Orleans arts institution, told Loop21 in 2011 that there is "a sensitivity and a mother-like compassion in her work that she brings to every subject."


"What I paint reflects the harsh realities of people's lives," Phipps told HuffPost. "I also speak about the prisoners and work as an advocate for innocent and incarcerated inmates."


Phipps' cause has gotten widespread coverage, and she gave interviews this month to Al Jazeera and New Orleans Public Radio.


From April, Phipps will tour 20 universities throughout the country with her artwork to raise further awareness about the incarceration problem in Louisiana. A schedule will soon be available at Sheila's Fine Art on Facebook.


"This means a lot to me," Phipps said of her work and the tour. "I have met former prisoners who spent 10, 20, even 30 years in prison [and were ultimately] exonerated."






-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











8 Podcasts To Improve Your Love Life

$
0
0

Much like love itself, assembling a list of podcasts about love (and lust, dating, singlehood, breaking up, etc.) is a challenge. 


Here's why: after we checked off the basic categories of relationship and sex advice from our playlists, drawing a line between what was a "love" podcast and what wasn't was harder. Any storytelling podcast, it seemed, could fall under the umbrella of causing warm, heart-stirring emotions in a listener -- listen to "Love+Radio," "Snap Judgment" or "Strangers" and see if at least one episode doesn't leave you surreptitiously blinking away tears at your desk. Beyond that, subject-driven podcasts -- for example, sewing in "Seamless" or technology in "Note to Self" -- sometimes end up relating to the endless ways humans get together or drift apart, and all the maneuvers that could happen from point A to point B.


A recent episode of Gimlet's "Sampler," a podcast that compiles interesting bits of audio from the vast offerings out there, proved that a love story emerged from a long-running show centered around Disneyland. (Listen to that one, too -- it's good.) This discovery isn't all surprising. On a platform where nonfiction storytelling is still largely the name of the game, what it means to be human is explored over and over again, in new and moving ways. And, often, what it means to be human involves love.


Still, we can't rightfully recommend simply listening to all of the podcasts (you have the time, right?), so here are a few choice ones that often tackle the matters of the heart.



Podcasts For When You Just Want a Darn Good Story


"The Heart," hosted and co-founded by Kaitlin Prest and co-founded by Mitra Kaboli, describes itself as an "audio art project and podcast about intimacy and humanity." The format isn't static, but the long-running program (originally titled "Audio Smut" when it began in 2008) maintains a distinct feel that's more like reading someone's diary, or watching a sparse yet emotional film, as compared to reading a newspaper. Whether an episode is more like a nonfiction narrative ("Idiot + Dummy"), closer to a traditional interview ("Beauty Is Pain"), or a mix of reporting and personal experience ("The Magic Wand"), each one will bring you closer to feeling like you're less alone in this mad, mad world. A bonus: "The Heart" does a great job representing love beyond straight relationships.


Even non-New York Times subscribers can hear stories from the paper's popular "Modern Love" column on the go, thanks to the podcast of the same name. For those unfamiliar with the topic, the column includes essays about brief romantic encounters, crushes, long-term relationships -- essentially, the gamut of loving experiences. The podcast adds an additional element (besides being much easier to take in on a crowded train) with celebrity narrators. Having Judd Apatow or Emmy Rossum read a love story to you is not too shabby.



Podcasts For When You're In The Middle Of a Romantic Quandary


If love were easy, the world wouldn't have nearly enough material to write songs. And even though being a human who sometimes likes other humans can be a challenge, that doesn't mean you have to go it alone. Enter advice columnists, whose sage words of wisdom are now readily available to be piped into your headphones on a lonely, introspective walk. "Dear Sugar Radio," the audio analogue of the popular Rumpus column, is hosted by Cheryl Strayed and Steve Almond. The former, Strayed, catapulted "Sugar" from a niche corner of the Internet to a New York Times bestselling book. The two Sugars dispense thoughtful, empathetic advice, often dealing with topics of love.


Another podcast that started as a regular newspaper feature is "SavageLovecast," hosted by Dan Savage, known for his real-talk counsel and lack of fear about tackling any topic under the love and sex umbrella. (Speaking of love and sex, The Huffington Post has a nice pod about that very topic. Just FYI.)


But if you've been listening to Dan forever -- he did start the show in 2006, unheard of in podcast years -- give Molly McAleer's "Plz Advise" a try. A different guest appears on most episodes. Go back into the archives to hear Cassie Steele from "Degrassi: The Next Generation" and the so-called "Bachelor" villain Courtney Robertson dish out love advice.



Podcasts For When You're Single And Loving It ... Kinda


When you come home from seeing a movie by yourself for the first time only to be bombarded with engagement announcements and cute couples photos on social media, it's nice to have an auditory escape to retreat into. "The Lonely Hour" offers that space, with each episode about a different aspect of being alone. Appreciate the fact that the only person you have to look out for is yourself while listening to others' tales about solo travel or dining out for one.


If a more brash you-go-girl talk is what you need, "Guys We F****d," billed as "The Anti Slut-Shaming Podcast," is right up your alley. In each episode, comedian duo Sorry About Last Night, also known as Corinne Fisher and Krystyna Hutchinson, leave no sexual stone unturned in candid conversations with their guests. 


Productive types that desire some sort of action plan after getting fed up with the dating scene -- the average person can tolerate only so much boring small talk in the neighborhood's quirky new gastropub -- should turn to "This Is Why You're Single." This show is brought to you by another comedian lady duo, Laura Lane and Angela Spera, and spun off from their sketch show "inspired by real-life dating adventures and disasters." You may not learn exactly why you're single, but you'll know it's not just you who's riding the struggle bus to a happily ever after.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Singer-Songwriters Steve Grand And Eli Lieb Team Up For 'Look Away'

$
0
0



After listening to "Look Away," the new song by Steve Grand and Eli Lieb, we couldn't help but wonder: what on earth took them so long to work together?


The out singer-songwriters have joined forces for the haunting, piano-driven ballad, which hit YouTube this week. The accompanying video features footage of Grand and Lieb together in the studio, interspersed with performance footage of the men seated back-to-back and gazing directly into the camera. 


Lieb, who lives in Los Angeles, told The Huffington Post that he got the idea for "Look Away" when Grand, a Chicago native, announced plans to head west. Although the performers have individual sounds, their studio time couldn't have been more fruitful, he said. 


"I honestly think it turned out successful because we both just wanted to create something great," he said. "When you're in that mindset, you really team up and work together. And Steve is fun!" 


In a sad twist of fate, Lieb split from his boyfriend the day before the video was shot earlier this month. 


"What you are seeing on camera is me really trying to hold it together singing a gut wrenching song, after literally just ending a relationship with someone I care about deeply," he told HuffPost. "Not even 24 hours had gone by."


Grand did his best to keep the mood light on the set, telling Towleroad, "I’m an irreverent goofball and Eli is a more serious guy just really focused on his craft. I think it makes for an interesting collaboration.”


Fans of the respective performers are clearly digging the new tune. Just hours after its March 29 premiere, "Look Away" had racked up nearly 30,000 YouTube views. 


Here's to hoping we haven't heard the last of this pairing.  

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Close Encounters Of The 'Girls' Kind: Thoughts On The Show's Remarkable Fifth Season

$
0
0

"You know you just recoiled from my touch? You recoiled from my touch like I'm a monster!"


Desi, the parasitic narcissist, squawked these words during a fight with his new bride, Marnie, on Sunday's episode of "Girls." In a way, it seems "Girls" has been transmitting the same sentiment to its spotty audience for the better part of five years. After such an auspicious debut season -- one whose soul-searching comedic voice rang louder than most freshman series' -- the show has battled meandering subplots, dicey critical reception and, particularly during its previous outing, diminishing viewership stats. 


But this season of "Girls" is different. So different, in fact, that the aimlessness that has at times weighed the show down suddenly seems not to matter. (I say this as someone who has generally remained a fan, even in its fickle moments.)


I haven't stopped thinking about this week's "Girls" since the episode concluded. Specifically, I keep returning to a single shot: Marnie, barefoot and clad in a glittering red ballgown, stumbling out of Charlie's apartment and into the blinding daylight. After a chance encounter with her much-changed ex-boyfriend, her blissful evening has given way to the agonizing reality that nothing gold can stay. Crushed by the realization that the same Charlie she just praised for no longer "trying to please anyone anymore" has become a heroin fiend, Marnie is left to stagger back to the tiny war zone she shares with Desi. The scene cuts to displays of Brooklyn's city life, and the chapters of Marnie's life collide. Our tightly wound protagonist yielded to Charlie's spontaneity, only to discover the experience was something of a fantasy.



The sight of Marnie's dispirited stroll recalls something "Girls" has revisited across its five seasons: the sensation of going home, specifically with a heavy heart and a clouded mindset. As I watched, teary-eyed, I thought of the many times the show has centered episodes on the notion of returning -- or discovering -- home. Not just the literal domicile in which a person resides, but the tingle that comes with fleeting satisfaction. Marnie dashing through Manhattan's streets with Charlie in a whirlwind of impulsivity, poaching cash from a wealthy playboy and falling into a Central Park pond? For a few brief hours, that was home. 


But it implodes, and we see Marnie dump Desi before venturing to a nostalgic emblem of home: her former apartment with Hannah, the same one where the two pals frolicked around to "Dancing On My Own" in Season 1, after Marnie processed her frustrations with Charlie and Hannah learned Elijah is gay. Even if the beats of Hannah and Marnie's contentious friendship have been trying over the years, the sight of them crawling into bed together is like a revolving door of redemption. In the world of "Girls," as in reality, setbacks of all magnitudes require characters to seek relics that represent comfort. When that comfort materializes, they are home.  


Marnie's unanticipated walk of shame reminds me of Hannah emerging from Dr. Joshua's (Patrick Wilson) lush apartment after her unexpected decampment in Season 2. Like Marnie's escapades with Charlie, Hannah's kinship with Joshua was so instant and so profound that the night she spent with him felt like a dream. Those impromptu connections -- the phenomena where the world fades and our attention is married exclusively to the present moment, and to the person with whom we're sharing it -- are rare, but "Girls" has adeptly captured them, especially during this current season. It's as if the aimlessness that crept in throughout the show -- Hannah's OCD, Jessa's obstinate underemployment, and the overblown ebbs and flows of the characters' collective friendships -- has been leading to these moments, when, finally, the concept of "growing up" has again located an authentic, piercing, sentimental voice. 


Outside of Sunday's episode, that's most evidenced via Shoshanna's new life in Japan. The show has struggled the most with Shoshanna's maturation, at times presenting her as an alien of the wired, "Sex and the City"-obsessed student we first met. But her latest brand of self-examination has taken her to across the world, where she convinced herself she'd found happiness as an assistant manager at the "second-biggest cat café in Tokyo" -- until the truth came pouring from her mouth in last week's episode: "I'm really sad, and I'm really fucking lonely."



In the next scene, Hannah, while bitterly attending a female-empowerment retreat where she was decidedly not at home, snuggled up to her mother, seeking the consolation that both women need from one another. (The reason Hannah's mom decided to stay with her gay father is because he provides comfort. "If I'd known 20 years ago," she said, before trailing off in wistful contemplation.) And then the episode cut to Shoshanna walking down a Tokyo street, empty but for the flashing lights of a city that has mostly fallen asleep. It is her literal walk home, yet we know that Shoshanna is anywhere but home. The dread of returning to the vacancies of a life unfulfilled are suffocating, and the task of finding an escape is daunting.


In seeking something unfamiliar, Shoshanna now craves any semblance of familiarity. It's an intractable paradox. In pursuing their own complicated version of home, two other characters -- Adam and Jessa -- have found it in each other. I'm always dubious of shows that shove platonic friends together for romances after several seasons (bye, "Friends"). But for these two adrift souls, both of whom attempted to smother their mutual attraction for fear of Hannah's resentment, their budding relationship has grounded them. They stabilize each other, just like Elijah -- a character that often hasn't worked, despite Andrew Rannell's winning performance -- and his sweet new beau (Corey Stoll).


In between all of this remarkable characterization, the current season of "Girls" has consistently captured the comedic groove that defined its early essence. Amid blips of melancholy comes humor, and the best dramedies know how to walk that line finely. It's what allows Hannah to simultaneously counsel her father through his first gay hookup and mourn the instability that has suddenly impeded her parents' relationship. It's what prompts Ray to gripe about a competing coffee shop's business practices when really he is lamenting his loneliness. It's the ridiculousness of Hannah's teaching decisions, bookended by clashes with a disapproving Fran.



But as the show invades my thoughts in a way it hasn't since the inaugural season, I keep returning to the image of Marnie hiking home in her shiny frock and wet hair. If "Girls" is about the proverbial journey of growing up, Marnie's emergence from her diversion with Charlie is a moment so authentic it's uncanny. Their talk of running away together wasn't even given time to fade into an afterglow -- it faded into oblivion, a reminder that experiences are ephemeral and there is, more often that not, some form of ill-fated termination around the corner. Nothing gold can stay, and Marnie's venture to solidify her divorce and clamber into bed with her once-and-forever best friend is a signal that maybe it's OK to grow up in incremental spurts instead of overnight transformations. She'd initially resisted Charlie's invitation, but then became uncharacteristically swept up in the moment. It was there that she found a side of herself she'd been seeking, almost like a fairy tale. Almost.


By the time Marnie lied down, Charlie and Desi were just vital ripples in an ever-flowing ocean. They brought her ashore, and now she will set sail again, even if that comes with a hefty amount of baggage. This season, "Girls" has mastered the sadness of changed experiences. But for Marnie, and for all of the characters on the show, there may finally be a new idea of home around the corner. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Seth Meyers Reveals The Sweet Meaning Behind His Son's Name

$
0
0



Seth Meyers is officially a dad! On Sunday, the "Late Night with Seth Meyers" host and his wife Alexi Ashe welcomed their first child, a baby boy born two weeks early.


On Tuesday's episode of "Late Night," the new dad revealed their son's baby name: Ashe Olson Meyers. It's a combination of his wife's and mother's maiden names -- a way to honor two important women in his life.


"A couple of people have said to us, 'Ashe Olson, do you think people will think you named him after Ashley Olsen?'" Meyers said on the show, joking, "And to them I said, 'No one will think that because I've long been a Mary-Kate guy.'"



The host also shared the hilarious and sweet story of his son's birth. After Sunday brunch, Meyers' wife started getting contractions and then her water eventually broke. "Wow. It sounds like what water would sound like if it broke," Meyers said, praising the apt name for the phenomenon. 


After an epic Uber ride, the couple arrived at the hospital to find most of the staff wearing Easter-themed bunny ears, an image which amused Meyers but didn't seem to affect his laboring wife. 


When baby Ashe was born, the new dad said he "exploded into laughing and sobbing at the same time."


"The weird thing is that you're just not a parent ... and then you are," he added. "It takes your brain a couple hours to catch up to that."


Congratulations to the new parents!

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












The Gay Young Adult Novel You've Been Waiting For Is Finally Here

$
0
0

Award-winning novelist Tim Federle makes his first foray into young adult fiction with The Great American Whatever, and it's every bit worth the wait. 


The new book, which hit retailers March 29, follows Quinn Roberts, a 16-year-old aspiring filmmaker with a weakness for Jolly Ranchers and boys. After a devastating tragedy, Quinn embarks on a "laugh-out-loud sad" journey of self re-discovery in hopes of getting back on the path toward Hollywood glory -- or, at least, graduation. A budding summer romance doesn't hurt, either. 


Federle's affable wit is apparent in these two exclusive clips from The Great American Whatever audiobook, also released this week. In the first clip, the author narrates a scene in which Quinn confronts his love interest, Amir, after an awkward night on the town.





The audiobook also includes an interview with Federle, which can be heard below. As the author explains in the interview, he wanted The Great American Whatever to focus on a complex, "less-filtered" character whose sexuality was significant without being his most definitive trait. It's a slight departure from Federle's middle grade novels Better Nate Than Ever and Five, Six, Seven, Nate!which feature a gay protagonist who is just beginning to understand his feelings toward other boys. 





"I hope that readers of all persuasions find a really funny, wry narrator who also speaks to a minority population," Federle says in the interview. He had a lot of personal experience to draw from, too. "Quinn speaks with a certain sophistication that I frankly think a lot of gay people have, because we're so aware so early that we're different from others," he says.  


While The Great American Whatever is geared toward a teen audience, Federle hopes the book will resonate with readers of all ages. 


"So much of the teenage experience – particularly the complications in forging new identities and relationships – continues well into adulthood," Federle told The Huffington Post last year. "I want people to read The Great American Whatever with a smile on their face and maybe a couple tears in their eyes."


Federle is in the midst of a creative blitz that's taken him from stage to page and back again. In 2015, the former Broadway performer, 36, nabbed a Lambda Literary Award for Best LGBT Children's Book for Five, Six, Seven, Nate!, and released Gone with the Gin: Cocktails with a Hollywood Twist, the latest in his bestselling cocktail series. He's also co-written the book for the musical adaptation of "Tuck Everlasting," which opens on Broadway April 26. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Trump's America Is One Where Women Aren't Trusted

$
0
0

Women in this country are largely considered untrustworthy narrators of our own experiences. This is especially true when it comes to women's interactions with men, and even more true for women who say they have been assaulted by men, sexually or otherwise. 


Former Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields said that she was forcefully grabbed and nearly thrown to the ground by Donald Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski at a Trump press conference on March 8th. There is eyewitness testimony. There is a photograph of Fields' bruised arm. There is an audio recordingandvideo footage of the alleged assault. And on March 29th, Lewandowski was formally charged with battery. 


Still, Trump isn't convinced Fields is telling the truth.


On March 11th Lewandowski tweeted that Fields was "totally delusional," and now Trump, whose campaign has vowed to stick by Lewandowski even if he's found guilty, has resorted to textbook gaslighting and victim-blaming.



  • Trump has repeatedly suggested that Fields was lying about the whole thing, offering up theoretical holes in her story: “How do you know those bruises weren’t there before?"


  • He suggested that women who are assaulted must scream to make said assault legitimate: “If you’re going to get squeezed, wouldn’t you think she would have yelled out a scream or something if she has bruises on her arm?"




  • He blamed Fields for the entire incident: "She's grabbing me and asking questions. She's not even supposed to ask questions."




  • And he topped the whole thing off by implying that because Lewandowski has a family, he couldn't possibly assault a woman: "I think it’s very, very unfair to a man with a wonderful family."








Trump's comments are incredibly dangerous, not just to Michelle Fields, who has received a barrage of abuse on social media, but to all women who come forward with allegations of assault.


Publicly announcing the innocence of someone who has been accused of assault necessitates we assume the accuser is lying. As writer Aaron Bady beautifully outlined in a 2014 essay for the New Inquiry:



The damnably difficult thing about all of this, of course, is that you can’t presume that both are innocent at the same time. One of them must be saying something that is not true. But “he said, she said” doesn’t resolve to “let’s start by assuming she’s lying,” except in a rape culture, and if you are presuming his innocence by presuming her mendacity, you are rape cultured. It works both ways, or should: if one of them has to be lying for the other to be telling the truth, then presuming the innocence of one produces a presumption of the other’s guilt.



When women are assaulted, they know in no uncertain terms that the culture they exist in is not on their side. They know that the default attitude towards their claims will be doubt and suspicion. They know people will wonder what they did to "invite" the alleged assault. When women who are assaulted choose not to come forward with their allegations, they are often trying to avoid the shitstorm of critique and abuse and re-traumatization that will almost certainly follow them if they go public with their claims. And if they change their minds, and come forward at a later date, they know the public will use that time gap as another justification for why they must be lying.


It is this culture that kept Bill Cosby's alleged victims silent for decades. 


It is this culture that allowed a Canadian judge to criticize alleged victims of Jian Ghomeshi for texting each other, suggesting that the communication might be indicative of "collusion." 


It is this culture that left Luckiest Girl Alive author Jessica Knoll unable to use the word "rape" in regards to her gang rape for years. 


It is this culture that created an atmosphere in which Fields felt so unsupported that she left her job.


I have written before about how as a presidential candidate, Trump's misogyny legitimizes misogyny writ large, giving people permission to hate women. In the same vein, his remarks about assault give people permission to ignore women who come forward about violence they have endured at the hands of men. 


As EMILY’s List Communications Director Marcy Stech said in a statement:



Nothing says ‘cherish women’ like questioning a woman’s motive after her assault has been caught on camera. The leader of the Republican Party has repeated over and over again that ‘no one is a bigger supporter of women’ -- but today’s incident underscores Trump’s decades-long record of offensive and misogynistic behavior that gets at the core of his being.



Welcome to Trump's America.  






 


Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liarrampant xenophoberacistmisogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Denise Bidot On How Her Mom's Body Image Struggles Helped Her Love Her Curves

$
0
0



Plus-size model Denise Bidot says she realized that "beauty is not based on a size" after watching her mother struggle with loving her body.


The 29-year-old beauty and self-love advocate, of Puerto Rican descent, sat down with The Huffington Post recently to discuss how witnessing her mother's own body issues as a child shaped who she is today. 


"I probably wouldn’t be who I am without that struggle," Bidot told HuffPost. "I watched her first hand not know how beautiful she was, not accept her body and her curves the way she should have."


In response to the thousands of women who struggle with body image, Bidot began touting the mantra "There's no wrong way to be a woman" on social media. She also recently partnered with Unilever for their new Personal Care campaign #100PorcientoTu (#100PrecentYou), which promotes Latinos' self-expression and celebrates individuality.


"Halfway through my career, I realized it’s about more than just me," Bidot, who was one of the first plus-size models to walk a fashion week runway, told HuffPost. "It’s about helping shift the way people see beauty. It’s important for women to be able to see themselves on TV, in magazines, on billboards, catwalks and relate to women we’re being told are beautiful."


Watch the full video interview with the model in the video above. 


This video was edited by Matt Lynch, shot by Jon Strauss and produced by Flavia Casas and Katherine Santiago

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How 3 Women Are Disrupting One Of Music’s Biggest Boys Clubs

$
0
0

“A lot of people think that particularly techno electronic music is a very male music. And they have every right to think that."


That's what Frankie Hutchinson, one third of the booking agency Discwoman, said in a recent documentary about the lack of diversity in the electronic music industry.


Thankfully, Discwoman is doing something to change that.


Founded by Christine Tran, Emma Olson-Burgess and Frankie Hutchinson, Discwoman was created in 2014 as a platform to showcase and promote female- identifying DJs in electronic music. The booking agency is meant to represent "cis women, trans women, and genderqueer talent in electronic music," according to Discwoman's website


The gender imbalance in electronic dance music (EDM) is impossible to ignore with women making up only 11 percent of artists at electronic music festivals in 2015. In 2014, only 18 percent of electronic labels included women on their rosters. 


"Right now the majority of big EDM executives are white males. By offering more perspectives within the business side of the industry this engrained sexism can change," Tran told The Huffington Post in a recent interview.


Discwoman is here to give female DJs more visibility by booking them at bigger venues, streamlining the growth process and ensuring each artist is paid what she's worth. (And the trio hopes to bring some of bell hooks' feminism to everybody, obviously.) 



Each woman brings a unique and integral skill to the NYC-based booking agency. Olson-Burgess (a.k.a. UMFANG) is the resident DJ of the trio, Tran is the event producer and business powerhouse, and Hutchinson does the outreach for the agency dealing with PR and social media. 


Olson-Burgess explained that the gender pay gap is just as real in EDM as it is in other workplaces. "People will tell women it's such a great opportunity, this is a lot of exposure, you'll make a lot of connections so it's OK to take that pay cut," she told The Huffington Post, adding that Discwoman is hoping to help end that pay inequality. "We're here to train women to remember that that's not worth it and that's not how it should work. Women should be able to do what they want to do without being taken advantage of."  



Women should be able to do what they want to do without being taken advantage of.
-Emma Olson-Burgess


Since 2014, Discwoman has hosted events in cities around the world including Mexico City, Los Angeles, Puerto Rico and New York City. The trio was recently featured in an episode of "Tribes," a web series created by Smirnoff Vodka's Smirnoff Sound Collective that highlights diversity within dance music. (Scroll below to watch the full Tribes: Discwoman episode.)  


The Huffington Post sat down with Hutchinson, Olson-Burgess and Tran to discuss sexism in EDM, the importance of safe spaces for women in the industry and what they're doing to break into the boys' club of electronic music. 


Tell me a little about what a female booking collective is and why you chose to create it. 


HUTCHINSON: Bookers and booking agencies can hold a lot of power in terms of changing the scene and changing representation. We decided that it was a really strong place to effect change, so we launched one. 




What made the three of you finally say, this is bullshit -- we're going to bring more women into the industry ourselves? 


OLSON-BURGESS: It's not that we wanted to see more women, it's that we were already seeing more women, but they weren't getting booked in the venues and places we wanted to see. 


TRAN: I feel like each of us were doing it in our own way. 


OLSON-BURGESS: Now that we have credibility as an agency from being in the public eye, we get more opportunities to syphon that down into our community. When we engage with other agencies we know how much money to ask for and how to stay firm on that. We make sure that women are getting paid equally as their male peers. 


Is there a big pay gap for women in electronic music?


OLSON-BURGESS: Yea definitely. There's a lot of fear about asking for the same amount as your male peer and just feeling credible. I think that too often women get self-conscious about presenting themselves as being worth a larger amount. Whereas men just do that and they're paid fairly and no one questions that authority. With Discwoman we're trying to encourage women to ask for what they deserve and not undersell themselves because it does happen so often. I think especially in New York it happens more because people will tell women it's such a great opportunity, this is a lot of exposure, you'll make a lot of connections so it's OK to take that pay cut. We're here to train women to remember that that's not worth it and that's not how it should work. Women should be able to do what they want to do without being taken advantage of.



We live on @dublab in preparation for LA debut tonight w @finetimela @umfang now, @djvolvox next dublab.com

A photo posted by DISCWOMAN (@discwomannyc) on




Why do you think that women are not being booked at bigger venues or festivals? 


TRAN: It's not a quantifying lack of women by any means, I think it's a visibility and a platform issue. Women often don't have the safety net of people behind them to help them succeed. I think a big part of it is getting over that fear of putting yourself out there -- and whether that's conditioned into us because of our gender or whatever -- we just need to get over that. 


OLSON-BURGESS: Our culture needs to shift so that there's encouragement for women on each level of success. The three of us see that happen, in part, by giving women opportunities and also offering them exposure. If you see a billboard of a black woman DJing a festival -- young women are going to be like "Wow, that's possible for me."If women only see these white European men DJing then women assume they can't be that person. The more image we see of diverse women doing these big things, the more women are encouraged to believe that that could be them.


HUTCHINSON: Even when we're talking to people about potentially being on the Discwoman roster so many of the women have reservations and are scared because it's different. There's no language for us to describe women's experiences in electronic music because there's so little experience to base it on.



There's no language for us to describe women's experiences in electronic music because there's so little experience to base it on.
-Frankie Hutchinson


OLSON-BURGESS: I think there's also the fear that I've experienced myself where we are culturally brought up to think that women will always play softer and prettier music and they're not necessarily as technically talented. The last five years or so I've had a woman mentor tell me that my brain isn't different from other male DJs and that I can learn some of the more technical stuff just as well. I had just been conditioned to think I simply couldn't do it.


I really thought that using synthesizers was harder for me, I thought that programming was harder for me because I'm a woman. Women thinking they can't do certain things is such a problematic cultural issue. If I -- as a feminist woman musician -- once thought that women can't be as good as men then just think of all the people in the world that think that women aren't as good.


Watch the full Smirnoff Sound Collective Tribes episode about Discwoman below.





Where do you think this engrained sexism stems from within the electronic music industry?


TRAN: Right now the majority of big EDM executives are white males. By offering more perspectives within the business side of the industry this engrained sexism can change. The paradigm will hopefully shift when more women are in those higher up positions and are able to offer a more diverse perspective when it comes to decision-making and giving opportunities to new artists. Also it would help if more men could take a step back and realize that there's so many more types of artists out there that are talented. 


OLSON-BURGESS: Some people won't book a DJ simply because she's a woman. 



#FREEMANKO @MASSIVEGAY WITH @DISCWOMANNYC

A photo posted by WITCHES OF BUSHWICK (@witchesofbushwick) on




Do you have any personal stories of sexism you experienced either while DJing or dealing with people in the industry?


OLSON-BURGESS: One of the worst experiences I ever had actually was a few weeks ago at an event. A guy reached over and tried to pull the mixer up while I was in the DJ booth because there was about 20 seconds of silence after the host introduced us. He apologized but, still, no one ever does that -- and that is so not OK. This is my job, I know how to do my job -- you should do yours. It's just little things like that that I've experienced where certain men think they're going to cover their asses by making me look bad and making me look like I don't know how to work this machine that I use all the time.



If you see a billboard of a black woman DJing a festival -- young women are going to be like "Wow, that's possible for me."
- Emma Olson-Burgess


HUTCHINSON: Yea definitely. For me, a lot of the experiences can be very subtle. I've had men say comments like, "Wow, I'm so impressed with what you're doing." And I can see right through that shit -- I'm not here to impress you. It's so insulting because they're surprised that we can do this and we can do it well. Why are you so shocked? I've known I've been smart for a really long time and now some men are suddenly just discovering it. 


OLSON-BURGESS: It's usually people wanting to assert power over a situation where they need to be more respectful of a woman's space. It just sucks because you see how much this subtle sexism is overlooked and how a guy may not even realize he's doing it. It can make me feel devastated for months and he didn't even understand what happened was wrong. That's why communities are so important. Having a community to affirm that yes, you should be able to call someone out on their behavior and that doesn't mean that you're mean or a "bitch." Explaining subtle sexism is so hard and women are so often made to feel guilty when we point it out.



miami ☀️

A photo posted by Frankie Decaiza Hutchinson (@frankiefatgold) on




How do you think feminism interacts with your music? 


TRAN: I think on a decision-making level I just want women to be paid equally in this industry. I want to make sure that women are valued and respected. 


HUTCHINSON: I have bell hooks talking to me in my head all the time. I mean the foundation of all of my political beliefs is what bell hooks says. 


I mean feminism really is for everybody.  


HUTCHINSON: It really is! I completely believe that. 


OLSON-BURGESS: Feminism definitely informs a part of me when it comes to my career. The more women I hear about and read about making music, the more I feel a strong connection to those women. And in that sense feminism does affect the way I feel about what I do and what I'm channeling when I'm performing. It influences the way I present myself to the world. 



☺️

A photo posted by Frankie Decaiza Hutchinson (@frankiefatgold) on




Do you guys ever get annoyed by the "woman in music" question? Or the "female DJ" question when, in fact, you can be a DJ first and a woman second. 


TRAN: Oh yea. I think it's annoying when it becomes tokenized. A lot of times we'll get emails with the subject line: "Looking For Female DJ." Whereas I prefer when people email us and say "Hey I love Bearcut can I book her?" When someone takes that extra step to listen to their music that goes a long way. 


HUTCHINSON: I don't know I don't really mind it to be honest.


TRAN: That's just me on a personal level. I just don't like the tokenism of being a woman.


HUTCHINSON: But sometimes people are just really explicit about the fact that they want to change what they're doing and they're doing that by bringing more women in. And that's great. 


Context is definitely key.


TRAN: Definitely.


OLSON-BURGESS: I mean even our name "Discwoman" -- that's outwardly political, but ideally none of us actually want to host exclusively women events. We feel that everyone's welcome, but when you're trying to change people's minds about something you have to be more explicit.   


Head over to Discwoman to read more about the booking agency. 


This interview has been edited and condensed. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Is Mysterious Viral Hoaxer 'Zardulu' The Greatest Hoax Of All?

$
0
0

It started with a rat taking a selfie.


In January, New York City actor Eric Yearwood revealed that “selfie rat” -- a viral video that appeared to show a rat taking a selfie -- was a hoax, surprising virtually no one. But what was most interesting was Yearwood’s explanation for the hoax: that the video was staged by a mysterious, rat-training, Brooklyn-based performance artist who called herself “Zardulu.”






Gothamist speculated that this “Zardulu” was also behind the even more famous “Pizza Rat” video, which shows a rat dragging a slice of pizza in the New York City subway. Both viral videos featured New York City rats, and both Yearwood and the man who filmed “Pizza Rat,” Matt Little, are members of the Upright Citizens Brigade Theater. (Little and Yearwood say they do not know each other, and Little maintains that Pizza Rat was not staged.)



Fantasy and reality are indistinguishable #zardulism is the art of the viral age #bagelpigeon

A photo posted by Zardulu (@zardulu) on




Yearwood said in January that Zardulu was likely behind other viral hoaxes. An anonymous person claiming to be Zardulu strongly hinted she was behind “bagel pigeon,” and on Wednesday she claimed responsibility for “Pizza Rat.”





The legend of Zardulu has been snowballing for months, with an article in the Daily Dot and a segment about her on podcast Reply All. This week, the New York Times published an interview with yet another UCB actor, Greg Boz, who claimed that he worked with Zardulu to stage a hoax involving a “three-eyed catfish” plucked from Brooklyn’s Gowanus Canal last year.


But many people are ignoring the possibility that Zardulu herself may be the greatest hoax of all.


On Wednesday, Gothamist's John Del Signore -- who originally broke the selfie rat story -- noted that Yearwood’s and Boz’s stories about Zardulu are getting more and more ridiculous as time goes on. For instance, Yearwood most recently told Gothamist that Zardulu invited him to a highly ritualized rat funeral that involved a floating gold platform, then to a bonfire in New Jersey where multiple people dressed as Zardulu danced around him.


“At this point our best guess is that Yearwood is Zardulu (for the record, he denies it) or that Zardulu is the creation of another improv comedy actor (Boz?) or actors in Yearwood's circle,” Del Signore wrote.


And there’s no hard evidence that Zardulu really exists. The person who has emailed The Huffington Post, along with numerous other outlets, claiming to be Zardulu, has refused any attempt to verify his or her identity. Of course, if Zardulu were real, this would make sense, as Zardulu wishes to be anonymous, like a robe-wearing, rat-training Banksy.


“You're assuming that I want you to do a story on me, which I don’t,” the person claiming to be “Zardulu” told HuffPost in January. “So, if a lack of proof that I exist means you will not be doing one, that is quite alright with me.” And when this reporter asked Zardulu Wednesday if an in-person meeting would be possible the response was, "We already have."


But despite the apparent desire not to have a story written about her, Zardulu seemed to crave media attention. After more than a month of no contact, HuffPost received an email from Zardulu, including videos of “herself” in a mask and robes, discussing art and rats. When this reporter did not respond, Zardulu emailed again, this time with the subject line “Please send proof that you are real.”



And though there’s no smoking gun that Zardulu is a lie, there are plenty of reasons to be suspicious.


For one thing, Twitter and Facebook accounts for Zardulu became active just the month before Eric Yearwood went to Gothamist with his story. Zardulu, however, had an explanation.


“I got an email a few months ago that essentially said 'I'm gonna RAT you out' so I knew that time was running out,” Zardulu wrote. “I was pretty upset when things started to unravel but soon decided it could be an opportunity to say what I'd been thinking for a long time, that creating urban legends is the art of the viral era. It is Zardulism. So, I made a couple social media accounts to spread that message.”






Additionally, while “Pizza Rat” creator Matt Little (who has never claimed to know Zardulu) and “Selfie Rat” star Eric Yearwood, both members of UCB, claim not to know each other, Yearwood and Greg Boz — the man who spoke with the New York Times about working with Zardulu on a catfish hoax— do know each other. They have worked on projects together at the UCB and have been Facebook friends since August 2015. Nevertheless, Boz told HuffPost that the fact Zardulu worked with both of them seemed purely coincidental.


Weeks ago, Boz mailed HuffPost a handmade pamphlet titled, “The Founding and Manifesto of Zardulism.” (A copy of that pamphlet is now available online). Though it’s clear there are several of these pamphlets floating around, Boz claimed that he personally only had one -- the one Zardulu had given him, and which he mailed to HuffPost.


But evidence suggests Boz had at least two pamphlets in his possession. Each of these pamphlets includes woodblock stamps in red paint. Every pamphlet has some spots where red ink fell on the pages while still wet.


Before he mailed the pamphlet to HuffPost, Boz emailed some photos as a preview. But the stray ink spots on the photos Boz sent do not match up with those in the pamphlet that arrived in the mail.




When asked about this, Boz admitted that the photos depicted a different copy. When pressed for explanation, he said, "We must have had a misunderstanding."


For now, Yearwood and Boz seem unfazed by speculation that Zardulu is a hoax within a hoax.


“It doesn't matter to me one way or the other whether people believe in Zardulu or not,” Yearwood said. "I was only a bit player in a video. The other hoaxes that are emerging speak for themselves. As for Zardulu's ‘unbelievable’ eccentricity --  go check out some performance art in Bushwick and then tell me someone dressed in robes passing out catfish is an impossible fantasy."


Boz was similarly dismissive of the Gothamist piece. “I do not understand how anyone could follow the bizarre logic of that article,” he said.


But whether or not Zardulu is a performance artist, a creation of Yearwood and Boz, or something else is almost irrelevant to her message -- and to the philosophy of "Zardulism."


"In many ways my work is an experiment in the human need for a belief in myth," Zardulu once told HuffPost in an email. "You can disprove a myth a hundred times over but the impact of that original belief is far more powerful."


UPDATE 3-30-2016: This story has been updated with a comment from Greg Boz.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

9 Life Lessons Everyone Can Learn From Selena Quintanilla

$
0
0



Thursday marks the 21st anniversary of the day Tejano music lost its queen.


Selena Quintanilla was murdered at the Days Inn hotel in Corpus Christi on March 31, 1995, when she was only 23 years old. Though it's been more than two decades since her tragic death, she will never be forgotten.


Looking back at old TV interviews with Selena, it's easy to see why she continues to be a source of inspiration to fans across the world. The young Grammy-winning star was as kind as she was talented, and as wise as she was beautiful.  


In celebration of Selena’s incredible life, here are 9 quotes that epitomize her timeless wisdom, and the life lessons we can learn from them.


1. Believe in yourself. “If you have a dream, don’t let anyone take it away. Always believe that the impossible is possible.” 


2. Don't let anyone tell you what you can and cannot do. "Tejano music was hard for us because I was a girl. My dad had a lot of problems while trying to set up shows for us or presentations because there are a lot of men who don't think that women can get the attention of the public. But ... wrong!"





3. Go ahead, get in touch with your roots."I feel very proud to be Mexican. I didn't have the opportunity to learn Spanish when I was a girl, but...it's never too late to get in touch with your roots."


4. Education = everything. "Music is not a very stable business. You know it comes and it goes, and so does money. But your education stays with you for the rest of your life."


5. Appreciate what you have. "The reason I'm really appreciative of everything that's going on around me is because of the fact that I never expected it, and I want to keep that attitude."





6. Don’t be complacent. “You hope for something. You wish for things to happen when you’re not doing as well, and when it comes around, it's like, oh, you wanna slow down but you have to stop and think [about] where you came from, you appreciate it even more. It’s better to be working than not working.”


7. Do what makes you happy. "I eat anything, and I'm not preoccupied with my figure. The most important [thing] is that the people accept me for my music, not for physical appearances." 





8. Let bygones be bygones. “What’s really cool about our family is we don’t hold grudges. That’s been the key to the success. We’ve been in little disagreements, and whether we’re right or wrong we’re gonna apologize.” 


9. Lead by example. “Anybody can be a role model. Anybody can.”




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

10 Photos That Perfectly Illustrate The Reality Of Mental Illness

$
0
0

Sometimes a photo can express more than words ever can.


That's especially true when it comes to mental health conditions, which are challenging to explain to those who don't understand what it's like to experience them. Despite the fact that these disorders bring about crippling physical and emotional symptoms, the illnesses often are "invisible" to the naked eye -- and that can perpetuate negative stereotypes that someone's suffering is "all in their head."


Enter these stunning photos, captured by artists who know firsthand what it's like to face mental illness and the stigma surrounding it. Their artistic expressions nail the plight that people with mental health conditions face every day and how their disorder makes them feel. They're tangible proof that mental health disorders are no joke and deserve just as much sensitivity as any other health condition:


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Jackson Lake Island Is The Creepy Abandoned Movie Set Of Your Dreams

$
0
0

If you're in the mood for an adventure that's both spooky and scenic, then Jackson Lake Island is your bone-chilling idea of paradise.


Tim Burton targeted this grassy island in the Alabama River as the set for his 2003 movie "Big Fish." In the film, characters traipse through an enchanted forest to a town of seemingly perfect homes, storefronts and streets, with an eerily haunting twist


Film crews built sets for the movie, but neglected to tear them down afterward. As a result, Jackson Lake Island boasts a village of dilapidated dreams that has weathered with time.






Photographer Johnny Joo took a visit the island recently, and came away with some haunting footage. 


"It's almost whimsical... it is one place that I had thought only existed within the film," he told HuffPost. "It's a fun place, really."




Indeed, travelers may be surprised to find that Jackson Lake Island isn't all doom and gloom. It's actually a bright and sunny recreation spot most of the time, famous for the original "big fish" that await fishermen. 


Visitors can also kayak, camp overnight, and mingle with friendly goats who roam this unexpected patch of bliss.


"You don’t think about going to an island when you think about Alabama," said Bobby Bright, who co-owns the island with his wife Lynn. "You think about a lot of things, but not an island."


Explorers can visit any day of the week through Jackson Lake Island's unmanned entrance gate: They just need to call Bobby for the gate code and leave $3 in the vintage collection box. 


Bobby plans to build a treehouse on the island this year, in addition to repairing some of the deteriorating "Big Fish" houses, he told HuffPost. A virtual tour on the island's Facebook page reveals goats, fish and some seriously serene sunsets.






You can find more footage of Jackson Lake Island, as well as photo prints for purchase, on Johnny Joo's website.


H/T Country Living

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Meet The Brilliant Pianist Behind Martin Scorsese's Upcoming Biopic

$
0
0

Over his long and celebrated career, pianist Byron Janis has experienced triumphs and challenges unknowable to most of us. He's overcome injury and illness to maintain a storied career, performed in Soviet Russia in the midst of frenzied anti-American sentiment. He's even spoken out about brushes with the paranormal. 


In January, Variety reported that Paramount was developing a biopic on Janis' life with Martin Scorsese, based on the pianist's autobiography, Chopin and Beyond: My Extraordinary Life in Music and the Paranormal. But who is this piano maestro? In a phone conversation on March 24, Janis' 88th birthday, he reflected on a life likely unfamiliar in its particulars to many Americans today, but one that powerfully captures the resilience that springs from an open mind and a willingness to embrace imperfection and impossibility.


When it comes to the movie itself, Janis doesn't have much to say, but his optimism about the project shines through. Details remain scant, as he expressed reticence about discussing the film before getting the go-ahead from Paramount. "We don't have details yet, and they don't want me to speak about it until they do," he told me. "I'm very happy ... I'll be involved."


Though Scorsese is now reportedly developing biopics of megastars Frank Sinatra and Mike Tyson, the film based on Janis recalls past Scorsese projects like "The Aviator," the Howard Hughes biopic that brought the reclusive mogul to the forefront of the movie-going public's consciousness. Janis may be a less familiar name than Sinatra to the casual music fan, but his life is primed for the Scorsese treatment.



"A very good ear"


Byron Janis only lived a few short years before his uncanny musical ear was discovered. When he was 4-and-a-half or 5 years old, he remembers, he perfectly mimicked a tune his kindergarten teacher had played on a piano -- first on a xylophone, then on the piano itself. "A note was pinned on me by the teacher, and that terrified me, because I knew when notes were pinned, something was wrong," he chuckled. "I thought, oh, what have I done, what have I done wrong. I came home, and I was relieved to hear that I hadn't done anything wrong." Instead, his teachers had requested a meeting with his parents to discuss the little boy's remarkable musical talent and recommend piano lessons. 


By the time he was 8, Janis had exhausted the repertoire of his local piano instructor, who recommended him as a student to a renowned Russian pianist, Josef Lhévinne. Leaving his father behind in Pittsburgh, Janis moved with his mother and sister to New York to study with Lhévinne and his wife, Rosina, another highly regarded piano teacher. 


As a young boy, Janis immediately grasped the rudiments of copying tunes on the piano. "In other words, I had a very good ear," he said. When he began studying under the Lhévinnes, he had more subtle lessons about the art of music performance to learn. "The thing I learned, which was very important, is there is no perfection. It doesn't exist. On earth, anyway," he said. He recalled that one week, while he was being taught by Rosina, her husband interrupted impatiently to instruct Janis to try a different technique with a passage he was practicing. "What that taught me was, there were various ways of playing the same piece," he said. 


That wasn't just a possibility, but a necessity, when it came to growing into his own artist. As a teenager, Janis studied with the legendary pianist Vladimir Horowitz, and he told HuffPost that avoiding the absorption of a teacher's style could be near-impossible. "It took me a good three years, I would say, to get over that influence," he said. When he made his Carnegie Hall debut, still a student of 15, Horowitz told him,"Well, OK, I taught you everything I know. Now, you're on your own. You'll make mistakes, but they'll be your mistakes." Janis reflected, "He was saying you don't want to be a second Horowitz, you want to be a first Janis." 


The incorporation of small idiosyncrasies, unique approaches to certain passages, and even mistakes or "off" notes became part of what made a specific pianist a joy to listen to, not just a robotic succession of notes. Even the tuning of the piano needs a bit of imperfection, Janis said. "I had a piano once tuned by a tuner with something called a stroboscope [ed: a stroboscopic tuner]... I sat down to play, and I couldn't play anything. Why? Because the notes were so exact that there was a perfection there. And it was absolutely terrible," he explained. 





Obstacles overcome


At a very young age, however, the musical prodigy began to encounter often painful and bewildering hurdles to pursuing his dream. His prestigious instructor could be tough, and had old-school methods for drilling Janis on technique. "[Lhévinne] had a terrible habit, for me, of when I played a wrong note, which happened quite often at that age, he took his ruler out of his case and he'd hit my hand hard with his ruler. And I began crying, because it hurt!" Janis recalled.


As it turned out, those ruler swats were just a taste of what lay in store. His entire career would ultimately be troubled by painful and disabling hand injuries and disabilities. At 11, he put his hand through a glass door while roughhousing with his sister and slashed his left pinky, resulting in nerve damage and joint stiffness that would, doctors told him, never go away. In the 1970s, Janis was afflicted with psoriatic arthritis in both hands, leaving his joints stiff and inflamed.


Despite the obstacles presented by his own health, when asked whether he ever considered changing careers, he brushed the question aside. Instead, Janis has spent his life working with and around his aching fingers. After his apparently career-ending injury as a young boy, left without feeling in his pinky, Janis told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that he "learned how to use my eyes in a peripheral sense to see where the pinky was. I learned how to put it in the right place as I went on."


When, at the height of his fame as a concert pianist, arthritis bound up his joints, he took a similar tack. "If one finger was inflamed, I would use another. It was improvisation of a different sort," he told the Post-Gazette. Even the greatest musician could be forgiven for allowing their career to wither in the face of a direct attack on the tools of their trade, but Janis continued to perform at the highest level for decades, even after undergoing multiple surgeries on his hands. After keeping his affliction hidden for years, he spoke publicly about his struggles with psoriatic arthritis in 1985, later becoming a spokesman for the National Arthritis Foundation. 



A cultural ambassador


In 1960, at the blossoming point of his fame, Janis found himself an ambassador of a more geopolitical kind when he was selected to participate in the U.S.-Soviet cultural exchange agreement. In 1962, he returned for a seven-week tour, at the invitation of the Soviets. His very first Moscow concert, he remembers, made clear the high tensions between his host and his home nations. "I came out to Moscow for the first concert, walked out onto the stage, there was no applause, and I was absolutely shattered by this," he said. "The U2 spy plane had just been shot down by the Russians ... I was the first concert after that. There was such anti-American propaganda, it was unbelievable." As his performance swelled through the theater, however, he saw signs that his audience was being won over. "At the end they were coming to the stage in tears," he said. "It really shows you what music can do."


Janis' willingness to try anything -- and hope for the best outcome -- took lighter forms, even in Soviet hotels. As he was traveling with American engineers who were recording his performances, he thought to ask them a recording-related question: "I asked them, 'Where are the bugs?'" Janis remembered. "And he found one in the chandelier, and he found one in the telephone. So I said, 'You know, there's no reason for my calling room service anymore.' I would just say, 'Could we please have more toast in the morning?' And you know what, there was more toast in the morning," he chuckled.



Confronting the unknown


Perhaps the most controversial aspect of Janis' biography -- and possibly his Scorsese-produced biopic -- is his open embrace of the paranormal in his life. The pianist, who says he's always felt profoundly drawn to the composer Frederic Chopin, found a kinship with his musical forebear in this.


"You see, Chopin believed in other worlds very strongly," he explained. His autobiography, on which the film will be based, delves into his otherworldly experiences, many of which, he says, have to do with his favorite composer. In the book, he recalls reading, at around 13, a book about Chopin that explored the composer's more ethereal beliefs, and it had a profound influence. "That feeling seemed to open a new place in me, or perhaps it identified an uncharted landscape I had yet to explore," he wrote in his book. "I was happy reading I was not alone in my thoughts."


On his 88th birthday -- and the eve of the 50th anniversary of his marriage to painter Maria Cooper Janis, who co-authored Chopin and Beyond with her husband -- the pianist said he's seen enough real ugliness to be comforted by possible better worlds. "That's why I'm not having a big birthday party [this year]," he said. "I didn't want it. I cannot feel celebratory with what's happening in the world. It's just so awful."


America, and the world, may seem to be in quite a shambles right now, but Janis has seen it in a pitiable state before, and he's never been afraid to step outside of a purely artistic role to make one small effort to heal divisions with music. It's not just his Soviet ambassadorship, either; when asked what, after such a brilliant career, was his proudest moment, he hesitated, then responded with an episode little remarked upon in most retrospectives of his life. "When my father died, my mother, many years later, said, 'I wanted to tell you something that your father said,'" Janis remembered. "'He said, what I'm proudest about about Byron is he didn't play in Alabama during Selma. He canceled a concert.' And that showed me what a beautiful person he was." 


That memory from the Civil Rights era strikes a poignant note now, as musicians like Beyoncé and D'Angelo, along with so many less-famous protest musicians, are putting their art to work decrying the unjust suffering of black Americans in Ferguson, Baltimore, New Orleans, and all over the country. Though we've traveled far from the time of Selma, many of the same, well-known injustices remain. 


"People are so frightened of the unknown," Janis told HuffPost. "I think the unknown is important. I'm frightened of the known." He laughed a little. "The unknown at least we have a chance. With the known it's not too good."


Byron Janis himself has become a relatively unknown figure, a dignified classical piano maestro in a world of reality TV celebrities and movie stars who open their whole lives up for tabloid scrutiny. In opening his life story, so much of which will sound odd and even crazy to skeptics, to an audience as large as that of a Scorsese film, he's taking another optimistic leap. For this preternaturally resourceful artist, there have always been unknowns that allowed him a chance -- the possibility that an improvised technique could circumvent what doctors called a career-ending injury to his finger, or the possibility that a virtuosic performance could warm a theater full of angry Soviet citizens to an American. It's in the fluid spaces between cold certainties that his art and his outlook on life flourish, and one certainty remains: It's worked. 


Listen to Byron Janis on Spotify:




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

God Is A Woman In Previously Forgotten Feminist Exhibit 'The Sister Chapel'

$
0
0

Warning: This article contains nude imagery and may not be appropriate for work environments. 



In the early 16th century, Michelangelo painted the ceiling of the iconic "Sistine Chapel," rendering Adam, God and the gang in a stunning depiction of the traditional creation myth -- which is to say, a very patriarchal one. 


Around 400 years later, in the 1970s, artist Ilise Greenstein enlisted 12 lady artists to create what she called "The Sister Chapel," a direct challenge to the dominant, patriarchal vision of creation, in favor of a secular and divine tribute to the goddesses whose resilience and creativity literally make human life possible. The result was an awesome feminist collaboration that, for some reason, never gained the prominence of other works like Judy Chicago's "Dinner Party" or Chicago and Miriam Schapiro's "Womanhouse."


Beginning in 1974, Greenstein began contemplating an alternative sanctuary to the male-centric churches, synagogues and holy places sprinkled throughout the history of mankind. In a 1983 interview, Greenstein expressed her frustration, one shared by many women, about being so blatantly cropped out of the creation of the whole universe thing. "God and Adam touching hands -- almost. Where was Eve? ... I decided that I would challenge the Michelangelo concept; I would retell the myth of creation."



Greenstein invited 12 artists to select a female role model of their choice, and create an homage to their heroine on a nine-foot canvas. As writer Gloria Feman Orenstein explained in the now defunct publication, Womanart: "This chapel, then, is not about the creation of man, but the birth of woman." A 1974 proposal written by Elsa Goldsmith describes the plan in full: 



"The Sister Chapel is a portrayal of how women artists see other women … historically, spiritually, symbolically and in reality. Approximately 12 artists work together in this effort. We plan to have a free-standing circular structure, about, say, 30 feet in diameter, with a suspended circular painting for a ceiling. The artists’ paintings, (each of approximate dimension 10 feet high by five feet,) will be spaced around the inside of the circle and four pieces of sculpture will be included..."



Despite the fact that the 11 featured portraits were based on the same prompt and created in the same dimensions, the subject matters and styles varied greatly. There's Shirley Gorelick's portrait of Frida Kahlo, a stunning tribute in the style of the Mexican painter, featuring motifs relevant to her life story including a miscarried fetus and orthopedic corset. June Bloom's "Betty Friedan as the Prophet" stars the author of The Feminine Mystique in a vibrant red ballgown, staring down at the viewer intensely amidst a surreal desert backdrop.



The only non-Western tribute is by artist Diana Kurz, who depicts an accurate representation of the ultimate Hindu goddess Durga, the root cause of creation and destruction. In the painting, an eight-handed figure wields a shell, a sword, a bow, and a tambourine, donning a sari before a full moon.


Joan of Arc, Artemisia Gentileschi, Marianne Moore, and God herself are other role models worthy of artistic tribute. Some artists took a more abstract approach; for example, Martha Edelheit conjured an idealized vision of female strength with her piece "Womanhero." And Sharon Wybrants chose to honor herself and her many superhuman powers with the piece "Self-Portrait as Superwoman (Woman as Culture Hero)."


"The Sister Chapel" debuted at PS1 in Queens in 1978, with 11 figurative paintings and an abstract ceiling panel painted by Greenstein. However, Greenstein's original vision for a tent-like structure enclosing the exhibit never came to fruition due to cost constraints. Instead, a model of the layout was shown with the work. The exhibit then travelled to SUNY Stony Brook, Cayuga County Community College, and finally, in 1980, at the Associated Artists Gallery in Fayetteville, New York.


In the years that followed, "The Sister Chapel" slowly faded into obscurity. Most of the artists held on to their own works, and, when Greenstein died in 1985, the feminist art church was all but forgotten. Save for a professor named Andrew Hottle, who studied the work, wrote the novel The Art of the Sister Chapeland eventually urged Rowan University to acquire the original 12 artworks one by one. 



After 35 years, the various components of the original "Sister Chapel" have been fully reunited and installed for a glorious exhibition at Rowan University in New Jersey -- and what's more, in their fully realized form. The works are presented inside Maureen Connor's original vision of a tent-like nylon and velvet structure.


"In a way, this is the first time it's really being seen the way they wanted it," Hottle explained to artnet News. He then commented on the profound significance of these works coming together after all these years. "Many of them did not imagine that this would ever resurface. It was buried for so long that they thought maybe no one would ever find an interest in it."


We are, most definitely, interested. If you're in the New Jersey area, check out Rowan University Art Gallery between March 31 and June 30, 2016, to see an essential feminist exhibition brought back to life after far too long. Eat your heart out, Michelangelo. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

If Typos Make Your Teeth Hurt, You Just Might Be An Introvert

$
0
0

When I was a single lass and trolling OkCupid, many moons ago (I hesitate to say how many, but suffice it to say Tinder wasn’t yet a popular dating service), I struggled to fill out much of my profile in a manner that captured my personality in a flattering yet discerning way. Except for one section: the “message-me-if” box at the bottom of the profile, a blank I knew exactly how to fill. “Message me if … you have a solid grasp of grammar,” I posted. No smiley face to ease the harshness. I meant what I said.


A recent study offers one possible explanation as to why some uptight broads like myself just can’t look past a misplaced comma or a phrase misspelled “look passed” instead of “look past.” In a study published March 9 in PLOS ONE, “If You’re House Is Still Available, Send Me an Email: Personality Influences Reactions to Written Errors in Email Messages,” University of Michigan researchers Julie E. Boland and Robin Queen found that personality traits of participants altered both how and to what extent the presence of typos and grammar errors in a written piece affected the readers’ perceptions of the writer.


Participants in the study read emails from theoretical potential housemates containing different types and numbers of writing errors, then responded to questionnaires evaluating the fictional candidates on characteristics like friendliness and trustworthiness. The study suggested that while traits like the age or education of the reader did not make them more or less likely to react harshly to blatant writing errors, characteristics like introversion and lack of openness or agreeability could. Generally, higher extraversion, openness and agreeability, but lower conscientiousness, predisposed participants to remain favorable to their hypothetical future roommates despite grammar and typing errors.


If you’re an introvert, or someone who thinks of themselves as more of a perfectionist, this seems like a great excuse to forever and always write people off the minute they write “loose” when they mean “lose.”


Just take it from a pro.


Though on OkCupid, disclosing my disagreeability about grammar errors was a risky strategy -- plenty of young swains shot me a DM just to jocularly include as many flirtatious typos and grammar errors as possible in defiance of my request -- it’s simply a preference I haven’t been able to get around. To this day, I cringe at “yea” instead of “yeah,” “they’re” instead of “their,” and “for all intensive purposes.” My fiancé has demonstrated comfort with the fundamentals of grammar and spelling since his first text to me over three years ago, or it might have been the last. My friends, though I’ve never consciously weeded out less grammatically adept pals, all send me punctiliously spelled and apostrophed emails.


It’s uncomfortable, poring through the study, to see that this knee-jerk reaction may be associated with low agreeability and openness, in addition to conscientiousness and introversion. Maybe, if I were still on OkCupid, I’d change my “message me if” requirement to something non-grammar-related. Or maybe it's just time for us grammar police to acknowledge that we're not just nerdy and dutiful: We might just be a little bit disagreeable and even close-minded.


Hey, no one's perfect.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Breaking: Teen Talk Is Totally Not Ruining Language

$
0
0

The death knell of language-as-we-know-it is sounded so often, it’s beginning to seem more like a false alarm. 


Last year, Oxford Dictionaries announced that its word of the year was an emoji – specifically, the “Face with Tears of Joy” emoji, a symbol that could represent a fit of laughter or a wave of joy. The dictionary’s president Casper Grathwohl explained, “it’s flexible, immediate, and infuses tone beautifully.”


Sure, decriers conceded, but is it a word? One linguist I spoke with, Lauren B. Collister, denied that “emoji” was an emerging language. “Emojis, while they do have some basic conventions for their use, do not have the regular, recursive grammatical structures that are a fundamental part of human language,” she said. By that logic, the “Face with Tears of Joy” emoji is not a word, but a signifier of mood or tone.


Still, Collister and other linguists who study Internet language, teen language and other emerging modes of communication generally aren’t cynical about emoji use, abbreviations, filler words, and other teen-centric tendencies. Collister believes teens are among the most creative language-users, and adorning their texts with emoji is evidence of that.


Another defender of youthful language flourishes is Sali Tagliamonte, Linguistics Professor at the University of Toronto and author of Teen Talk: The Language of Adolescents, out this month. 


“People are always so critical about teenagers and their use of language,” she said in an interview with The Huffington Post. “It’s a generational thing that happens over and over again. Young people are always highly criticized as leading to the demise of the human language, the bastardization of language, the decline of good and proper English. I wanted to set the record straight.” 


In order to do so, Tagliamonte asked her students to submit conversation logs accrued on different social media platforms. Analyzing years worth of data, she found that grammatically, text messages are just as sound as a well-written book, and that any linguistic changes that were occurring -- spelling conventions, stylistic choices -- were “superficial.”


One such superficial development: the use of “like” as a verbal hedge. It’s a change that’s been characterized as vapid, but Tagliamonte says the word has a storied history, with shifts in meaning that were criticized along the way. Today’s linguistic prescriptivists say “like” should be reserved for similes -- comparisons using “like” or “as.” But, Tagliamonte notes, that wasn’t always the case.


She cites a popular ad from 1954, for Winston Cigarettes, that read, “Winston tastes good like a cigarette should.” Poets, journalists, and even news anchor Walter Cronkite decried the slogan’s grammar, which they claimed should’ve read, “Winston tastes good as a cigarette should.” Their complaints didn’t slow the change in the word’s meaning; by 1961, Merriam Webster cited the phrase as an example of “like” as a commonly used conjunction.




Teen language use often reflects the language use of the general population. Both among young people and adults, women are the ones leading linguistic change 95 percent of the time – which may explain why words like “like,” “whatever,” and “so,” are discussed as ditsy rather than innovative.


Not every contemporary teen slang word has a storied history that can be recited to illustrate its flexibility. But, Tagliamonte defends words like “whatever,” describing them as inventive and uniquely useful rather than improper. “It filled a nice niche,” she said. “It’s a good word for talking about things that don’t really matter. ‘So, whatever.’ I think that’s a pretty good word.”


Another needlessly condemned construction: beginning sentences with “so.” It’s associated with teenage sloppiness, but Tagliamonte found that it’s used across all age groups, not just grammatically freewheeling young people. “I looked at ‘so’ across the community, from pre-adolescence around 9, 10, 11 right through to octogenarians in their 80s,” she said. “Everybody uses ‘so’ to introduce a sentence. So, that’s been around for at least 100 years.”


In fact, Tagliamonte says teen language use often reflects the language use of the general population. Both among young people and adults, women are the ones leading linguistic change 95 percent of the time -- which may explain why words like “like,” “whatever,” and “so,” are discussed as ditsy rather than innovative. There is one exception, however; when it comes to using “stuff” as a generic, young men are leading the charge.


Both young men and young women use acronyms while texting -- “rn,” “tbh,” “lol,” “TL;DR,” and countless others. The seemingly endless list of inventions is portrayed as goofy, lazy and mystifying rather than creative. But, Tagliamonte points out, there’s more invention happening than actual rampant word-replacement. In the conversations she analyzed between both teens and adults, 2 percent of words used were acronyms, across the board.


“Acronyms are just part of language,” Tagliamonte said. “People use acronyms! They use them all the time. Just because some acronyms have become normal, like TV and DVD -- the acronyms being used by young people today are normal for them. Some of them may go by the wayside, but that’s always true, some words come and go.”


Tagliamonte discussed one word that began as an acronym, and became normalized after colloquial use: “posh.” Originally, the word meant “port out starboard home,” referring to English travelers who could book cruise ship rooms that best blocked them from the sun. Today, it’s a word in its own right.


“What are the things that are going to stay in the language and what’s just passing fancy? That’s a tough question,” Tagliamonte said. But, “once something gets going, it’s pretty hard to make an about-turn. It’s possible, but once something gets going, it’ll probably just keep increasing." 


So don’t expect the latest teen-driven trends -- beginning sentences with “so,” using “like” as a filler word, and sprinkling written communication with occasional acronyms -- to go anywhere anytime soon.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images