Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live

Watch As An Emotional Mia Farrow Learns Her Family History In 'Finding Your Roots' Clip

$
0
0

We don't see much of Mia Farrow these days. Her most recent on-screen role was in 2012's little-seen "Dark Horse," and Farrow is now more commonly affiliated with international humanitarian work than she is Hollywood glitz. But you'll see her return to television on Tuesday's season finale of "Finding Your Roots."


The Huffington Post has an exclusive clip from the Henry Louis Gates Jr.-hosted PBS docuseries, which explores celebrities' ancestral history. Farrow shares the episode with Dustin Hoffman. Watch below as she learns vital information about her family's World War I roots. 




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


Why The Wizarding World Of 'Harry Potter' Should Stay Small

$
0
0





American Harry Potter fans found out, earlier this year, that their whole magical lives had been lived in deliberate ignorance: Muggle or not, we would never have gotten that coveted owl from Hogwarts. That’s because North America’s wizarding school, it turns out, is some place called Ilvermorny (according to J.K. Rowling).


Ilvermorny??


OK, fine. Within the books themselves we’d learned about chic Beauxbatons, the French wizarding academy, and Durmstrang, which appears to educate students from the chillier regions of magical Europe. There are no American students at Hogwarts (though fan fiction is littered with violet-eyed, raven-haired American exchange students named “Esmeralda” and "Chloe" who take the British school by storm). Obviously, there would be an American school.


The Ilvermorny announcement turned out to be just the tip of the skeletal ship rising out of the Great Lake. With the film adaptation of Rowling’s Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them coming to theaters this fall, starring Eddie Redmayne as Newt Scamander, Rowling is preparing fans with a four-part series on America’s magical history, which will be available on Pottermore. The series will address Ilvermorny, the Salem witch trials, America’s magical governing body, and the Navajo legend of skinwalkers.




It seems sour to not just get excited when Rowling bestows upon us more Potter world tales, especially when lacking a valid complaint. (The series has already drawn criticism for apparently irresponsibly mystifying Native American people and their sacred customs -- a very worthwhile debate.)


There’s something fundamental about the whole project of opening the franchise up to international histories and adventures, though, that irks me. Fundamental, but utterly trivial, of course. The essential flaw in the whole American magic installment is that it totally undermines the specific genre appeal of Harry Potter as opposed to other fantasy franchises.


HEAR ME OUT, OK?


The Harry Potter series, many have pointed out by now, basically combines magical fantasy with the classic boarding school novel -- a staple of British, young adult literature. These books focus on children and adolescents’ experiences in a school environment, where their classmates and teachers replace their family unit as the structure of their days. They can be fairy-tale-like (The Little Princess) or funny and lighthearted (Daddy-Long-Legs, Malory Towers) or dark coming-of-age sagas (A Separate Peace).


The boarding school novel offers a deeply comforting and tiny world that allows young characters to act out, fail, succeed, and learn Life Lessons™. For one thing, it effectively gets rid of the protagonists’ restrictive parental relationships without throwing them, orphaned and vulnerable, upon the world. Mostly benevolent teachers and headmasters guard them from the big bad world, but within the warm cocoon of the school, the kids can run amok with their friends on a perpetual adolescent sleepover. Boundary-pushing is inevitable, with consequences muted by the bubble in which their transgressions occur. The worst thing that can happen to you at a boarding school, typically, is that you’ll have to leave it and return to the real world, for one reason (expulsion) or another (graduation).


Other fantastical series have married the wide-ranging thrills of magical worlds with the comfortable limits of boarding school settings. Not too long before Harry Potter, there was Wizard’s Hall, a novel by Jane Yolen about a hapless wizard student named Thornmallow, and Worst Witch, a series by Jill Murphy about a hapless witch student named Mildred Hubble. Tamora Pierce’s Circle of Magic books follow four differently gifted children as they learn about their supernatural talents in a supportive academic community, guided by wise mentors. And so on.


Contrast that to questing fantasy series like The Lord of the Rings trilogy or even the Percy Jackson series, where the landscape is ever-shifting and the stakes often difficult to grasp. It’s not that J.K. Rowling didn’t build a world, as J.R.R. Tolkien did; it’s that the center of the world was more fixed and constant, and the further from that center -- Hogwarts -- the more misty and indistinct the world needed to be.


Much of the delight of reading Tolkien lies in taking an imaginative journey with the characters through Middle Earth, traveling over vast new territories, stumbling across unexpected societies and creatures, and being essentially open to the elements. At any moment, Frodo and his band could meet a clan of Ents or be set upon by orcs. It’s never quite clear what terrain they’re on and what the risks or rewards might be. It’s a narrative arc familiar to anyone who’s read Homer: In the perilous quest for a distant goal, what strange or frightening events might happen?







Harry Potter could almost be seen as a flipped quest narrative. For most of the series, our protagonists are in conflict with villains who are seeking powerful objects -- including Harry himself -- for their own nefarious ends. Harry and his comrades want to thwart Voldemort from finding the Sorcerer's Stone, not necessarily discover it themselves, though they ultimately may be driven to the point of trying to find it first. The Hogwarts status quo has its flaws (see: house elf liberation, Purebloods pitting themselves against Muggle-borns) but at a basic level, our main characters want to stay inside its walls and preserve its way of life, not go out seeking something that might change everything.


Besides, Hogwarts may not always be perfectly safe, but it’s closer than most places. It’s guarded with charms to prevent unlawful entry and other serious misbehavior. Inside, the ghosts never put a toe over the line of “mischievous," and the house elves ensure the banquet tables in the Great Hall groan with an abundance of delicious food. The students have common rooms to retreat to for work and play, populated only by other members of their House and cozy canopied beds. Conflict plays out in rousing games of Quidditch and classroom banter. Even the classes sound delightful.







Readers spend most of their time with friendly Gryffindors, like Harry and his friends, who go relatively unsupervised by their Head of House, Professor McGonagall. It’s other, more rule-abiding students -- prefects, officially -- who do what little regulation must be done within their clubhouse. And of course, there’s the headmaster, Professor Dumbledore, of whom even Voldemort is afraid.


The Harry Potter books aren’t just a fantasy saga, but a series in which readers became more and more deeply enmeshed in a fictional home. Boarding school novels can’t just hang out indulging in pranks forever, obviously; often the central conflict of these books, especially as a series progresses, revolves around the protagonists finding that the school is no longer able to protect them from the realities of a harsh world. Hopefully, they’re able to call upon the lessons they’ve learned as students to rise to these new challenges, even strike out into the world on their own.


As the Harry Potter series continued, Harry, Ron and Hermione often found themselves temporarily thrown into increasingly terrifying, high-stakes situations, far beyond the controlled tests offered in their classes. Finally, even the school itself becomes compromised; it’s no longer a safe haven, and the three friends choose to leave before their last year for the still more risky journey throughout the magical world to defeat Voldemort.


Deathly Hallows takes the form of a quest, unlike the six previous books in the series, but Hogwarts remains the beating heart. Even as the friends travel across rather nondescript lands in search of the remaining Horcruxes, the journey is leading them, inevitably, not to an unseen destination, but back to Hogwarts for the final, climactic battle. As the series ends, Harry, Ginny, Ron and Hermione have returned to Platform 9 3/4 to send their own children off to Hogwarts, a quiet narrative reassurance that our fictional home base has recovered and that the magical school adventures will go on, even as the books are ending.


Rowling has drawn adoration and criticism for continuing to write about the Potterverse after the series ended; officially, she'd said she planned to end the series at seven, a position she still maintains. But unofficially the franchise keeps expanding story by story and snippet by snippet. In a new play Rowling collaborated on, Harry Potter and the Cursed Child, audiences will see a middle-aged Harry struggling with his career and his son's early difficulties, which seems like a bit of a run around to the ending of the books.


Now that we’re dabbling in bits of non-Hogwarts magical history -- stories from other continents entirely, in fact -- the degree of building out of the magical world almost seems to be undermining the perfectly contained world Rowling built within Britain and its beloved wizarding school. The Potter world felt and continues to feel to me like my own bedroom: It isn't insulated from the threats of a dangerous world, but its particularity and familiarity make me feel psychologically cushioned enough to face those threats.


If my bedroom suddenly became the size of a football field, it would change the whole nature of my room and my relationship with it. Now the Potterverse's walls seem to be coming down, and instead of feeling excited, I just want to hold onto that room that was just the right size.







Obviously, I can ignore this. I can and probably will, because this isn’t what Harry Potter’s joy meant to me. Reading about Rowling’s conception of American wizarding history sounds about as necessary as reading a history of German courting customs by Jane Austen -- completely divorced of the specificity, detail and circumscription that made the originals so invitingly tiny and yet enormously complete. 


And if you're excited to read and talk about and argue on the "History of Magic in America," far be it from me to begrudge you that. You can get started on that on Pottermore today -- enjoy.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An American Road Trip, Photographing Nudes Along The Way

$
0
0

Sisters Eleanor and Rachel Hardwick, along with Chrissie White, joined forces for a road trip -- 28 days through eight states in the American West. As the trio journeyed through white sand fields, lush emerald forests, rusty canyons and enchanted caves, they couldn't help but think of the fast pace at which our planet is shifting and the sad reality that the breathtaking natural forms around us may not look like this for long. 


On the trip, the three artists collaborated to commemorate the stunning and ephemeral landscape surrounding them by reconnecting their bodies to the physical world and documenting the overlap on camera. The result is Celestial Bodies, a photography book that references the female body as well as that of Mother Nature and the planets, stars, moons and asteroids that surround her. 


The series features a stunning variety of nudes (and clothed figures) in nature -- whether leaping through blue skies, reclining on a patch of electric grass or stretching inside a yawning canyon. The following images show the intrinsic and ever so precious connection between man and nature. Or, more specifically, woman and nature. 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Watch Bruce Springsteen Sing 'Thunder Road' Over 41 Years

$
0
0



A music video supercut of Bruce Springsteen singing "Thunder Road" over 41 years just may be the greatest Bruce-related thing we've heard since they announced that the Boss' latest tour was coming to town. 


"Thunder Road" was the opening song on Springsteen's 1975 album, Born to Run. It's a classic Boss tune and it's now gotten the TLC it so clearly deserves. Super-fan Phil Whitehead -- a 20-something English teacher in London who produced the supercut video --  said he wanted to explore how a song like "Thunder Road" has changed over the years, not only in the way Springsteen performs it, but also how its meaning evolves with an older person singing it. 


Whitehead edited together footage of Bruce performing the song in different locations, including with the E Street Band, solo with an acoustic guitar and alone playing the piano. Reached in London by email, he told The Huffington Post that he's a relatively new Bruce fan. "I have only been on to that 'Thunder Road' [recording] for four of those 41 years but when I first heard his music, it immediately spoke to me and I was in. Since then, Bruce has been a significant part of my life," Whitehead said. 


Whitehead said the video was a labor of love that he began working on about an hour after the dates for Bruce's latest tour were announced. Why yes, he's going, which prompted Whitehead to ask if we could include this note to Bruce: "What's with the ticket prices? I now have 'debts that no honest man can pay'!)


As for everyone else, we trust you will enjoy the next 5:29 minutes of your life.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

30 Songs Hillary Clinton Is Jammin' To This Women's History Month

$
0
0

Need a soundtrack for Women's History Month? Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (and Spotify) have you covered.


On March 8, Clinton's official Twitter page shared a Spotify playlist that highlights women breaking down barriers and racking up awards in the world of music. According to the tweet, the songs are "on repeat" at the Hillary for America headquarters.  






Described as a "soundtrack for smashing glass ceilings," the 30-song playlist appropriately kicks off with Beyoncé's "Run the World (Girls)" before making its way through hits from Lady Gaga, Demi Lovato and more. Clinton also throws it back with "No Scrubs" from TLC and "Man! I Feel Like A Woman!" from Shania Twain. One song that sticks out? "The Schuyler Sisters" from Broadway's hit musical "Hamilton." Any tips for winning that ticket lotto, Hillz?


Check out Clinton's Spotify playlist below.




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

See The Fukushima Disaster Zone Then And Now In 10 Striking GIFs

$
0
0

On March 11, 2011 a massive 9.0 earthquake off the coast of Japan triggered a tsunami that leveled entire cities and villages and left 15,891 people dead and more than 2,500 missing.


The tsunami left 435 miles of Japanese coastline in ruin. Homes and buildings were leveled. Schools were destroyed. The massive wave had brought ships ashore. 


Tsunami flooding caused the cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Fukushima prefecture to malfunction, triggering a nuclear meltdown. 


Five years on, the recovery in the disaster zone has been slow but steady. Yet the cleanup around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant continues, a monumental task Japanese authorities have failed to tackle head on. 


See the stunning images from 2011 and 2016 below:










-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Artists Speak Out For Women’s Rights In Spanish Exhibition

$
0
0

Artists from Spain and across the globe are showcasing multimedia artwork in Madrid, Spain, to call attention to women's rights. Showcasing 60 works by 59 international artists, the exhibition, titled "ALLIED: Women Change The World," will run from March 10 to September 4 at the capital's CentroCentro Cibeles cultural center.


Organized by a Spain-based NGO dubbed the Alianza por la Solidaridad (Alliance for Solidarity), the show features works of graphic design, collage, painting and drawing by a range of contemporary artists. Curated by Emilio Gil, the collection of art seeks to “increase the visibility of women who dedicate their lives to defending and implementing women’s rights worldwide,” according to the organizers.


The 60 works will be on sale throughout the exhibition period, and the profits will be used to finance Alianza por la Solidaridad projects related to women’s rights. The 30-year-old NGO dedicates a large portion of its efforts and projects in the 17 countries in which it operates to women’s rights.




This post first appeared on HuffPost Spain. It has been translated into English and edited for clarity.



-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'The Bachelor' Season 20 Episode 10 Recap: The Women Tell All (Or At Least Some)

$
0
0

"The Bachelor" franchise has returned, this time with all-American family man Ben "Unlovable" Higgins at its center. And on "Here To Make Friends," we talk about all of it -- for the right reasons.


In this week's "Here To Make Friends" podcast, hosts Claire Fallon and Emma Gray recap Episode 10 of "The Bachelor," Season 20 -- the one where the women tell all... or at least, some. We'll discuss the show's gross race issues (#TeamJubilee4Lyfe), Olivia's attempted redemption and who the next Bachelorette might be.





And we're joined by the Bachelor Dudes, Max Godnick and Sammy Smith, for their important male insights. We also chatted with Ken Fuchs, director of "The Bachelor," to get the inside scoop on how the sausage gets made.



Check out the full recap of Episode 10 by listening to the podcast:





 


Do people love "The Bachelor," "The Bachelorette" and "Bachelor in Paradise," or do they love to hate these shows? It's unclear. But here at "Here To Make Friends," we both love and love to hate them -- and we love to snarkily dissect each episode in vivid detail. Podcast edited by Nick Offenberg.


The best tweets about this week's episode of "The Bachelor"...


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.


How A Sexy Thriller Could Get People To Care About Their Water

$
0
0

On the first page of Iowa author Jennifer Wilson’s new novel, Water, reporter Freja Folsom is assigned a story about a man who is illegally pumping his own water from a city aquifer. Freja is incredulous.


"Water is free. Stories about nature are boring. And I fell asleep for a second when you said the word 'aquifer,'" Folsom says.


Many people, even in our post-Flint world, can probably relate. Water quality isn't typically the stuff of go-to conversational fare. So that’s why Wilson, a former investigative journalist, has set her depiction of one state’s struggle for safe water against the backdrop of a “sexy romp.” Consider it Erin Brockovich meets Fifty Shades.


Sex scenes aside, the fictionalized struggle has roots that are very real. Last month, the Des Moines water utility announced that it will cease dumping the nitrates it removes from the area’s drinking water back into a local river. The utility is also in the middle of a controversial lawsuit that has targeted upstream farmland communities as responsible for the buildup of nitrates in the first place.


The problem isn't limited to Des Moines either. Some 60 Iowa cities and towns have dealt with excessive levels of nitrates in their water in recent years, a problem that has been linked to health issues such as "blue-baby syndrome" among infants in particular.


So, can a sexy thriller help turn more readers onto water activism? The Huffington Post recently spoke with Wilson.


This interview has been edited for length and clarity.



This is an unusual approach to a subject that can get pretty wonky. Given the seriousness of this issue, what do you say to folks who might say it’s a bit silly?


I think you have to read the book to see that fictionalizing the issue is not muddying the issue. By any means necessary, I want you to know what this is all about. I used to be a high school English teacher and I thought my goal, as a journalist, was to make sure people understood things. So what is it going to take? A really nice love story sells. I thought if I can put together two things that are unlikely bedmates, if you will, maybe it will seduce people into understanding probably the biggest issue of our time in the Midwest. I feel like we’re fighting for the soul of our state here and I don’t think anybody else takes this that seriously. I want them to take it seriously.


I think when issues have even a little bit of science involved with them, people feel they don’t know enough to have a say in it or to ask questions. So, I thought, what is the easiest method to administer a science lesson? Maybe it’s silly to pair a super serious issue with something that is sort of dramatic and interesting and enjoyable, but I don’t think so. You don’t have more basic of a need than water. You can’t live more than three days without it. This is our day-to-day survival and it is as essential as love itself. We can’t live without these things -- food and water, shelter and someone to love us, you know? 


What inspired you to tackle nitrate contamination in Iowa in particular?


I think, like most places in the country right now, we’re struggling with our water quality. It’s such a universal issue. I’ve been a journalist for about 20 years and I also write books. I’ve never really seen somebody follow a news story and let it set the pace of a novel as it unfolds. I was literally matching headlines from the Des Moines Register with some of the plot lines that were happening.


What fired me up was that Iowa should be leading the pack in how to manage wastewater from farms and agricultural areas. It’s one of our main industries and it’s what makes Iowa a very independent-minded state. I have a lot of respect for farmers -- I come from a farm family on my dad’s side -- but I felt there wasn’t enough of this debate happening in a reasonable way. I didn’t feel like anybody was understanding each other.


There has been a solution squired out here and there, but it doesn’t feel like there’s any commitment to going forward with respect to the land or water. So I deliberately chose a reporter with an old-school embrace of complete fairness, who would sit down at every table and hear what Iowans have to say, for the main character, Freja. Midwesterners are really good at hearing every side of this, or we used to be. So I wanted to sit everybody down at the table in the way I was hoping would happen in real life.



"I thought if I can put together two things that are unlikely bedmates, if you will, maybe it will seduce people into understanding probably the biggest issue of our time in the Midwest."
Jennifer Wilson, author


Freja is very skeptical of whether anyone will care about this story when she is assigned it. Do you think that apathy is still pretty common among the general public on this? Do you relate to it?


I really wanted her to speak for the people. To be as bored with the topic as I first felt when I started seeing it in the newspaper. Environmental stories are really tough as a reporter when you get one. Like, OK, I have to talk about chemicals probably and words that are hard to pronounce. So Freja is a stand-in.


It feels to me that your first instinct when you’re faced with a new thing is to run or shut down. But she kind of works through it. She has to face what is going on and she faces it very fairly and with an open mind. I hope that readers join her on that journey and end where she is. It’s not judgmental, it’s not trying to ruin anyone, but it’s about making progress and staying healthy and keeping our communities healthy.


Do you think, after what happened in Flint, more people are catching on?


The American people tend to like to panic a little bit. We all do, I guess. But I think that when the panic goes away, I hope our concern turns to understanding the “What can I do?” The answer is you can learn about the water quality issue in your city, because I guarantee there is one. And then you watch it and let the people in the position of decision-making know that you’re watching and have opinions on it.


Your voice really does matter and it matters especially if you have a grasp on what’s going on. I think it would be unrealistic in a state like Iowa to say people need to stop farming so we can have clean water. It’s not like putting on a carburetor and solving an air quality problem with a $40 fix. This is millions of dollars of equipment built to put nitrates in the soil. It’s a colossal fix and a taxpayer investment and it’s requiring responsibility from the people who make a living from the land that they have to leave it the way they found it.


And the topic of water safety has come up in the two most recent presidential debates as well. Do you think people are becoming more aware on this? Is there reason for optimism?


I’m not getting any of that yet. I’m getting people getting concerned. But I think too often we think someone else will fix the problem for us and we underestimate the power for our own voice or we turn it into a political issue.


There can’t be anything less political than water. We all need it. It’s easy to say we’re victims of a system that’s screwing us over, but it’s more intelligent to ask, “What can I do to make my community a better place?” I vote for that mindset and I think people ultimately are good and hopefully are going to move more in that direction once they have the facts.


Joseph Erbentraut covers promising innovations and challenges in the areas of food and water. In addition, Erbentraut explores the evolving ways Americans are identifying and defining themselves. Follow Erbentraut on Twitter at @robojojo. Tips? Email joseph.erbentraut@huffingtonpost.com.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

9 Portraits That Prove Feminism Really Is For Everyone

$
0
0

This is what a feminist looks like. And this. And this. And this... 


Feminist clothing company Wildfang created "The F Word," a photo series which features nine photos of self-identifying -- very different -- feminists. The images, which were published on International Women's Day, challenge perceptions about who can and can't be a feminist by featuring a diverse group of people. The series includes a minister, a beauty queen, a Samoan father with his three daughters and a group of strippers. 


"Our point of view is that feminism relates to a person who believes in equal rights and opportunity, irrespective of gender," CEO Wildfang Emma McIlroy told The Huffington Post. "We invite everyone -- men, women, trans community -- to support feminism and call themselves a feminist."


Wildfang reached out to feminists of all different, ages, ethnicities, religious affiliations, occupations and political affiliations. "We asked each of them to share their take on the F-word," a WildFang blog reads. "Feminism isn’t just for women, feminism is for all of us." 



We invite everyone -- men, women, trans community -- to support feminism and call themselves a feminist.
Emma McIlroy, Wildfang CEO


As Wildfang's creative director Taralyn Thuot explained in a press release, the company wanted to "set the record straight" when it comes to feminism. 


"In the lead up to this shoot, we did research and outreach with our community that made it clear that there was ambiguity, fear, passion and confusion associated with the word 'feminism.' We wanted to set the record straight," Thuot wrote. "So we shot a group of self-identifying but unexpected feminists in really authentic yet provocative situations to challenge perceptions and start conversations."


Each image is titled with the person's name, we well as a list of identifiers, which each subject defined for themselves. Underneath is a quote that sums up why they consider themselves feminists. 


Feminists come in all shapes, sizes and colors -- and here's proof.  


Scroll below to read why these 10 people are feminists. 



Head over to Wildfang to read more about the project or to buy some awesome feminist gear. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Gross-Out Humor Is On The Rise, And That’s A Good Thing

$
0
0


mid


I’m wary of sweeping adages about what makes a relationship last. Couples that laugh together, stay together. Families that pray and/or play together, stay together. How could such a narrow formula cover all of the nuances of a modern relationship?


The restriction that irks me most has to do with bodily functions; some say if you can’t laugh with your partner about smelly, primal deeds, you’re not truly intimate with him.


For me, that’s always been bunk. I have a dry sense of humor; spelling or editing flubs à la Weird Twitter, “The Office” or “Tim and Eric” make me laugh more than a fart joke ever could. So a first-date fart joke is a deal-breaker, and a fifth-date fart joke gives me pause. Call it snobbish, or squeamish, or a result of my sibling-less upbringing, but nothing makes me abandon a romantic interest, or a TV series, quicker than a penchant for gross-out humor.


For most of my life, this hasn’t been a problem. I’d avoid anything starring Adam Sandler, and selectively watch Judd Apatow movies, enjoying them in spite of the occasional potty humor-fueled scene. This always left plenty of comedies to choose from. Like most twee-ish millennials, I opted for Wes Anderson, "Seinfeld" reruns and so-bad-it’s-good shows. Today, my favorite comedy is the fast-paced, feminist “Jane the Virgin.”


But, as a twee-ish millenial, I’ve run into a conundrum: I really, really want to like “Broad City,” but the gross-out humor, well, grosses me out. To be clear: I don’t disapprove of Abbi and Ilana’s confessional tone and boundries-free relationship. I’m in no way suggesting that they’re unladylike; that word alone makes me cringe harder than a dirty toilet would. The problem is that I want to embrace the grittiness of the show, but can’t manage to.


I’ve started “Broad City” twice, looking away while Abby scrubbed gym bathrooms. I’ve laughed -- hard -- when Ilana’s warring habits of slackerdom and ambition amounted to her working at a temp agency during her lunch break from her day job, and leaving early to walk a pack of bougie, well-groomed dogs. But I keep getting held up on the episode where a group of friends huddled together during a hurricane are mortified by a turd that mysteriously appears in a shoe left in the hallway. For me, it’s the equivalent of watching a movie with gratuitous gore. I wail, “WHY?!” before pressing play on the next episode.


The answer, I think, depends on how cynical you are. My initial explanation for the recent spike in gross-out humor on TV shows (“Girls”) and in popular movies (“Bridesmaids,” “Trainwreck”) was that it was a way to make niche, quirky plots or characters appealing to a broad audience. Who’d really tune in to “Broad City” if each joke hinged on Ilana’s socially liberal politics? Her sex-pos rants are sure to get feminists excited, but are dudes as inclined to listen? And if this is the motivation behind the show’s fart jokes, are the writers being true to their experiences, or are they pandering?


A more positive interpretation, and what I believe is the truer one: Gross-out humor, when executed smartly, is a way of taking a taboo topic and normalizing it. This probably explains why I manage to stomach the gags on “Broad City”; Abbi and Ilana’s antics are forging new ground when it comes to what women can and can’t talk about. If dick jokes are okay, then carrying around a bag of weed in your vagina should be fair game, too. If bro comedies can quip about masturbating, why can’t women do the same?


When it comes to how women behave on screen, these forces of normalization are necessary. If the stand-up comedy scene is a barometer for how dirty jokes sound to audiences when they’re told by a woman rather than a man, things are bleak. Even though there’s been a surge against the harmful notion that women aren’t funny, sexist jokes abound and women comedians are underrepresented.


That the issue is so pervasive is exactly why “Broad City”’s brand of gross-out humor is important: to take the style of humor that men have used to reach audiences, and turn the focus to their own bodies, they not only question what’s normal, but assert it. And as much as their jokes make me squirm, I say it’s about time somebody tells them.


You can be highbrow. You can be lowbrow. But can you ever just be brow? Welcome to Middlebrow, a weekly examination of pop culture. Sign up to receive it in your inbox weekly.


Follow Maddie Crum on Twitter: @maddiecrum


 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Native American Fans Aren't Happy With J.K. Rowling's New Story

$
0
0

It might be time for J.K. Rowling to invest in a Time-Turner because time travel might be the only way out of this mess. 


The Harry Potter author released the first of four new stories on Pottermore Tuesday morning entitled, "History of Magic in North America." Her intention was to construct a foundation for American wizardry before "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" hits theaters in November.


Intention and reception, however, are two very different things, as many Native American fans found her characterizations of indigenous people to not only be inaccurate, but deeply hurtful. One of the biggest points of contention is how the author reduces Native American culture to a monolithic entity, erasing the tremendous diversity within the community. 



"In the Native American community, some witches and wizards were accepted and even lauded within their tribes, gaining reputations for healing as medicine men, or outstanding hunters. However, others were stigmatised for their beliefs, often on the basis that they were possessed by malevolent spirits."



"The Native American wizarding community was particularly gifted in animal and plant magic, its potions in particular being of a sophistication beyond much that was known in Europe. The most glaring difference between magic practised by Native Americans and the wizards of Europe was the absense of a wand."



Many went online to address the colonialist undertones in Rowling's language and how her characterizations of Native Americans further contribute to their marginalization.  


"There is no such thing as one 'Native American' anything. Even in a fictional wizarding world," Dr. Adrienne Keene, a Native Appropriations blogger, wrote in a post Tuesday. 


"We’re not magical creatures, we’re contemporary peoples who are still here, and still practice our spiritual traditions, traditions that are not akin to a completely imaginary wizarding world (as badass as that wizarding world is)," she added.


Others quickly joined in on the conversation, expressing their disappointment in seeing their culture represented so lazily in Rowling's text. 


















Rowling has yet to respond directly to her critics, but has answered other questions on Twitter. 






Rowling intends to roll out her next three stories this week. 


The Huffington Post has reached out to Rowling's rep for comment and will update this post accordingly if we hear back. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Surreal Photos Of Proudly Naked Women Challenge Classic Beauty Norms

$
0
0

Warning: This post contains nudity.



What is your favorite way to eat spaghetti? Family-style, among loved ones and boisterous conversation? Perhaps "Lady and the Tramp"-inspired, with a special someone and a strategically shared strand? Alone, on foot, and basking in the glow of your refrigerator? 


How about in the nude, surrounded by fellow spaghetti-loving queens, in a banquet bacchanal that would make 17th-century Flemish painter Jacob Jordaens proud? Yes, yes please. 



New York-based artist Lynn Bianchi's "Spaghetti Eaters" is a wonderfully body-positive photography series that proves the only way to enjoy carbs is sans clothing. In the silver gelatin prints, women of all shapes and sizes lounge lavishly while gorging on what I can only imagine is a heavenly mix of linguini, capellini, fettuccine and tagliatelle. 


"The 'Spaghetti Eaters' are not trying to impress or perform. These women are playing and eating with relish, celebrating their bodies without trying to be something other than what they are," Bianchi explained in an email to The Huffington Post, reiterating her artist statement that appears online. "The process, driven by spontaneity, parody and conceptuality, produced a collective sense of liberation for all the women that worked with me on the series."


The broader "Heavy in White" series was inspired by body-consciousness," Bianchi added. "It focuses on self-criticism and identity and refers and challenges at the same time classical and contemporary concepts of beauty and form."


Eat on, beautiful ladies. You're an inspiration to us all. And don't skimp on the parmesan! 


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











These Stunning Birth Photos Tell A Powerful Surrogacy Story

$
0
0

Canadian birth photographer Kim Brooks has been documenting labor and delivery for many years, but one recent experience was a first for her. On Feb. 11, she photographed a surrogate birth and witnessed one mom give another woman the gift of motherhood.


"Humans are incredible -- we are so unique to other animals that we can give such a gift," Kim told The Huffington Post, adding that the powerful birth experience made her tear up. "Being witness to a woman's gift of surrogacy so another can be a mother is womanhood and humanity like I've never seen before."



The story behind this birth is certainly emotional. 


Ottawa couple Heather and Craig Dunbar had delayed having kids for health reasons. Craig was diagnosed with kidney failure shortly after their wedding in 2006 and later went on dialysis while awaiting a transplant. In 2014, he received the life-saving organ donation from a family friend


"When we did eventually decide to try and start a family, we soon discovered that it wasn’t going to be as easy as we thought," Heather told HuffPost. After five failed IVF attempts, she and Craig decided they had given it their best shot. With seven frozen embryos remaining, they started looking into surrogacy.


Heather contacted agencies and conducted online research, but she found a frustrating lack of information about surrogacy in Canada and realized it would be a challenge to find a surrogate for her family. Though surrogacy is legal in Canada, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act prohibits prospective parents from paying a surrogate beyond her out-of-pocket expenses.


"I discovered quickly that there are more couples out there with infertility issues looking for surrogates than there are people willing to become a surrogate," Heather said. Discouraged, she mentioned her frustration while talking with a friend on the phone one day. The friend pledged to help her find a surrogate to carry her baby.



Meanwhile, an Ottawa mom, doula and photographer named Christine Crook had been wanting to become a surrogate since she gave birth to her own daughter 15 years ago.


When she and her husband wanted to start a family, they had no trouble conceiving, Christine told HuffPost. She was very affected, however, by a story she later read about a couple who suffered from infertility and couldn't get pregnant.


"I remember feeling devastated for that family," the mom said. "I felt so very blessed to be a mother and couldn't imagine my life without my baby! I decided that day that I would carry a baby for someone who couldn't. That one year of my life was worth giving someone a lifetime a joy."


In 2013, Christine tried to carry a baby for friends, but after multiple failed IVF attempts, she ultimately had a miscarriage. That couple is currently pursuing international adoption.


Meeting Heather and Craig was "really all meant to be," Christine said. After that first failed surrogacy attempt, Christine shared her experience with a colleague, who was pregnant as a surrogate at the time. 



"She asked if I would still consider doing a surrogacy journey, even if it wasn't for 'friends,'" Christine recalled, noting that she told her colleague she would definitely consider it if the opportunity arose. 


That same day, Christine's colleague stopped into the store where Heather's friend worked to do some shopping. Heather's friend congratulated the customer on her pregnancy, and she explained that she was a surrogate carrying for another couple. Heather's friend then said she coincidentally knew a couple looking for a surrogate, and the expectant mom replied that she had a friend looking to be a surrogate. The pair exchanged contact information and the rest is history.


Christine successfully became pregnant with the Dunbars' baby girl on the second IVF attempt. When it came time to give birth, Heather and Craig were there by her side. "It was incredibly beautiful and moving," Kim, the birth photographer, recalled. "Christine's elation upon passing over baby to Mom and Dad was the most beautiful thing I've ever seen -- such relief, joy and generosity."


Kim said Christine exclaimed, "I'm so happy she's here, I'm so happy!  Your baby is here! Take your baby! Take your baby!"


Heather and Craig named their daughter Clara. "Having her delivered and in her mother's arms was the greatest relief I have ever felt in my life!" Christine said.



Christine, Heather and Kim all told HuffPost that they hope their story and photos will prompt more awareness and conversation about "the gift" of surrogacy.


"Our notions of motherhood, womanhood, parenthood, family and love can expand and evolve because we are human and there are opportunities like surrogacy," said Kim.


Christine said her surrogacy journey was "one of the most gratifying experiences" of her life. "I want others to know that the gift of surrogacy was worth everything that was endured to get to that moment of birth and handing that baby into her mothers arms," she explained. "If I accomplish nothing else in my lifetime, it’s OK ... this was enough!"


Christine also witnessed the skepticism around surrogacy firsthand. "I was surprised by so many peoples' reactions when I told them I would not have any trouble 'giving the baby' to her parents," she said. While she worried the postpartum period might be difficult, it has been smooth sailing so far.



Heather and Craig said they feel incredibly lucky to have met Christine and gone through the surrogacy experience so closely with her.


"Our relationship with Christine is more than we could have asked for, and she made the whole experience a beautiful and joyful one," Heather said. "She is an amazing and selfless person to have gone through this whole process for someone."


Although their surrogacy journey has ended, the mom added that her family will maintain a lifelong connection and friendship with Christine. She will also remain a strong proponent of surrogacy, which she acknowledges can be a "sensitive" and "controversial topic."


"Surrogacy should be a choice available and open to everyone without fear of judgement or repercussion," she said. "I truly hope that these photos convey to people the beautiful and amazing results of a surrogacy journey and that without surrogacy this moment would not have been possible."


Keep scrolling and visit Kim Brooks' website, Facebook and Instagram to see photos from the emotional surrogate birth.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Your New Podcast Addiction Is A Fictional Thriller Starring A Truck Driver

$
0
0

"We talk a lot as a species about the night sky," our narrator muses into her truck radio. "It's one of those subjects that comes up more often than, say, the social structure of bees." Bees, she explains in defense, are observable -- one can see bees and how they interact. Yet, "so much of the night sky is nothing at all. It is an empty box, and, like all emptiness, it is a mirror."


This cross-section from the first episode of "Alice Isn't Dead" -- a fictional podcast that follows a nameless truck driver as she routes the country in search of her wife, whom she once thought dead -- captures the show's mood in a nutshell: eerie, insightful, offbeat. 


The show, written by Joseph Fink of the popular "Welcome to Night Vale" podcast, premiered Tuesday and has already reached the top of the iTunes charts. It's easy to see why: the show has shades of the popular "weird fiction" format that "Night Vale" follows while creating an entirely new universe. 


The first episode introduces listeners to the narrator, voiced by actress Jasika Nicole, who shares her thoughts while driving a cargo of travel-sized deodorant, recounting tales from the road. She comments on passing signs, truck-stop bars with video poker in the bathrooms, or the awkwardly high seat of a 16-wheeler, giving just enough detail to recall anytime you've been on a late-night road trip. The podcast recreates the uncanny feeling of timelessness, hours spent without seeing another house or vehicle, only to eventually stumble around a gas station snack aisle at an unknown hour trying to figure out which state you're in. 


"I spent a lot of time riding around in vans on long trips and things, especially in the U.S." Fink explained of his life touring "Night Vale" live shows around the world. "There's this interesting thing that happens where you just kind of see all these different places but without any context, because you're just kind of there for a moment and then gone. You just build your own narrative out of the little bits you pick up."


That narrative inspired the format of "Alice Isn't Dead."



There's this interesting thing that happens where you just kind of see all these different places but without any context, because you're just kind of there for a moment and then gone.
Joseph Fink, writer of "Alice Isn't Dead"


"Writing for Jasika is a really wonderful thing to do as a writer because you get to have somebody who's incredibly talented and bring what you write alive," said Fink of his collaboration with Nicole. 


He approached her about the project, as Nicole tells it, before a live "Night Vale" show. "He ended up pitching me the show," she explained, "but it was such an ordinary conversation between the two of us, like, 'Hey, how's it been going? So, anyway, I have this idea ...'" She signed on immediately and was pleasantly surprised when she received scripts some months later in the mail.


The show's writing had an affect on the actress even then. She described a beautiful day in Los Angeles when she was reading the script from her phone and a chill came over her.


"It's just this one woman in a truck driving across the country at night by herself," said Nicole. "She's describing the landscape in really beautiful detail and it's really creepy. If you've ever traveled a long distance in a car by yourself before, that alone is enough of a creepy factor. And when you add in all these things that she may or may not be seeing ... You kind of don't know what's real or what is symbolic or what's in her head."


Yeah, we're spooked.


What makes the environment in "Alice Isn't Dead" even more stark is the emotional complexity at hand. "If you take it at face value, it's kind of a horror story," Nicole explained. "Then if you, you know, step away from that and think about her perspective on what else is going on in her life, and how people interpret normal events that may be happening while other turbulent things are happening ... That kind of adds a little bit mystery to it."


The fact that she's on the search for the mysterious Alice, and wondering why she left, adds extra oomph to our truck driver's personal demons. 



Aside from its thus-far marvelous storytelling, "Alice Isn't Dead" offers a quiet form of diversity to the current lineup of fictional podcasts in its main character, who is, if you didn't catch it, gay. It may be ironic to celebrate it, as deliberately pointing out this fact -- that a story centers around an LGBT character, but doesn't shout it from the rooftops -- negates the sentiment somewhat. Still, we've seen so many gay characters on television and in films where their sexual orientation is the sum total of their character, for better or for worse. The fact that our narrator simply is shows an important glimpse of what a future of inclusive media could look like.


"I definitely think that the whole world of media could use as much diversity as possible," said Nicole when we asked whether more representation in podcasting was important. "The thing is that queer people, and people who are differently abled, and people of color -- I think that they are constantly being forced to see themselves in able-bodied, heteronormative, super-gendered roles all the time because that is what makes up the majority of the media that we're given to consume."


"It sounds completely reasonable that maybe straight people or white people or able-bodied people are having to envision and relate to characters that aren't exactly like them for once," she continued. 


The beauty of the "Alice Isn't Dead" narrator, Nicole explained, is that she could have had any kind of relationship. 


"I love that she is a queer character but she doesn't have to be, and I guess that's why it's so special," she said. "Because I go through my life and I'm not thinking every single moment of the day, 'I'm a person of color!' ... There are so many other facets to who I am, and I think that kind of goes across the board. It's nice to see a little bit of an intersection of these different identities and how in some ways, they matter a lot, and in other ways they don't matter at all."


Human emotion -- something that's at the forefront of "Alice Isn't Dead," along with some fantastical, creepy elements -- after all, isn't limited to one type of person.


"Everybody is mourning all types of loss, everybody is wondering what happens to us after we die," said Nicole. "These are storylines that cut across the spectrum of race and gender and everything else."

Subscribe to "Alice Isn't Dead" on iTunes or listen to it here.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.












The 'Ups And Downs' Of Sally Field's Career Led To A Starring Role In 'Hello, My Name Is Doris'

$
0
0

After decades in Hollywood, Sally Field is about to make you jealous. Why? Two words: Max Greenfield.


Field's new movie, "Hello, My Name Is Doris," required her to fulfill your fantasies of wooing the "New Girl" star, who is 34 years her junior. Greenfield plays a colleague recently transferred to the titular character's New York office. Doris (Field) is infatuated, routinely daydreaming about a fling that would disrupt her clerical monotony. Convinced they have a future together, Doris enters his social circle and misjudges almost every cue along the way -- all while dealing with the recent death of her mother and ongoing hoarding tendencies. 


Seeing Field in a lead role on the big screen has grown increasingly rare. The 69-year-old's last starring gig was 2007's little-seen "Two Weeks," and before that it was 1996's "Eye for an Eye." Which isn't to say she's disappeared: In fact, Field won an Emmy in 2007 for "Brothers and Sisters," and in 2013 she earned an Oscar nomination for "Lincoln." So it's just fine by her that top billing isn't often the flavor du jour because, in her eyes, those roles weren't easy to find in the first place. The Huffington Post hopped on the phone with Field last week to discuss "Hello, My Name Is Doris" and the "ins and outs" of a lifetime in Hollywood.


What do you make of the fact that this is your first lead role in a decade? And your last one was another decade before that?


I don’t make anything of it. It is what it is. It’s a long-term career. It’s going to have ins and outs and ups and downs, and it wasn’t like I wasn’t doing anything. I did a television series for five years, and I was playing with stage in a way that I hadn’t played with before. It was something I wanted to do. If I had found roles I had wanted to do, I would have done them. But they’re very hard to find and I was in transitional years. I wasn’t young, but I wasn’t old. Because I have a certain quality that maybe isn’t easily definable, I’ve always seemed younger than I was, except now I look my age. It’s hard to define. A long-term career is about riding it. It’s about taking what is there and constantly asking yourself, “Why are you here? What’s compelling you?” And going to the work where it is.


Has the past decade been as professionally fulfilling?


Oh God, yes, definitely. I was really playing with things. I’ve always been playing with things. Five years on “Brothers and Sisters” was incredibly difficult, and it really pushed my envelopes in a lot of ways, endurance-wise. We’re always in stages, like Doris is, and I was exploring what it is to be an older woman onscreen, and what does that mean? It wasn’t in film, but that doesn’t matter so much to me. It really doesn’t. It’s about the work that I do. It keeps transitioning. It doesn’t matter to me that I wasn’t the lead in films. Three years ago, I was in “Lincoln.” I wasn’t the lead in it, but I wouldn’t have changed that for the world. I wouldn’t have said, “Well, I really want to wait for a lead.” I don’t care! It gives me a moment to do something I couldn’t ever have done. I mean, when would I ever have had the opportunity to play such a complex character as Mary Todd? I was doing stuff!


You’ve kept busy, that’s for sure. But have the scripts you’ve received over the past decade mirrored the quality of the ones you saw earlier in your career? I ask that not just to harp on your age, but I do think the economics of Hollywood have changed a lot and we don’t see as many movies like “Norma Rae” or “Places in the Heart" now. 


Listen, it’s always been difficult for women. That’s nothing new. You could look at the statistics in ’79 or ’80, when I did “Norma Rae.” It’s always been difficult for women -- that is just the way it is. It’s a good thing that people are standing up and hollering now. It isn’t just women now standing up and hollering, and I think if it were just women, we would be silenced again, as usual. It’s diversity altogether, and that’s a big thing. There needs to be more stories about people who are not young, not white and not male because movies are incredibly valuable and important. But so is television, and so is everything onstage. Whether it’s a smaller audience or not, they’re stories. Human beings need stories. It’s how we communicate to each other. It’s a very important artistic form that started in Greek times. Before that, it was lore -- they used to do storytelling where they handed it down village to village. This is a human condition, and it has never been easy.



Do you think there are fewer quality adult dramas made now, though?


When you say to me “Now do you notice the difference in what it was in 1976 when I did ‘Sybil,'" no. I had to work my friggin’ tail off to get those roles. Not for “Norma” because I was offered “Norma,” which came from “Sybil.” But that was rare. It’s not like I did a lead role every year. The only one who has had the opportunity, and bless her friggin’ heart, is Meryl Streep. It’s either because she’s better than anybody and works hard, or it’s the luck of the draw -- I don’t know. Bless her heart. I applaud her for it. I thank her for it because she pushes everybody to keep on keeping on.


If you look at my 52 years in the business, it’s not that I had breaks or there was a time when all of these movies were happening. “Norma” happened and then there was a long time before another one happened. I was lucky enough because it was a bubble right there in the early ‘80s when they were actually doing some films with women in them -- there was “Julia” and a bunch of others. Then there was a wave because I did “Absence of Malice,” and not long after that came “Places in the Heart.” But there were always long stretches where there was nothing or there was something awful, but I had to make a living. There might have been something you just want to shove under the carpet. Without a doubt, it has gotten more challenging because now you’re not only female and you’re short, but now you’re older. But you just keep going. You keep asking yourself, “Why am I doing this? What matters to me?” You turn down what you don’t want to do and you work your tail off to head toward the things that you do want to do.


Do you look back and want to shove things under the carpet?


I wouldn’t want to even mention them for fear that you would write about them and someone might look them up. If they’re forgotten, let them die a grisly death. There have been lots of them! Some of them I go, “Oh, sweet mother of God.” I think you may already know which ones they are.


Where did you locate the fine line between Doris' battiness and her relatable search for fulfillment?


She’s a very diverse character. Certainly to find the character, it began with the exterior. It was in finding her look. But you can’t latch yourself onto her battiness. You have to create a full character with a history and a life. How did she get in this situation? How could she be in her 60s and never really have lived a life? She lives very much in a fantasy world -- how do you create that? I talked to therapists about borderline personality issues because I wanted her to be rooted in a reality, where you would believe this isn’t a cartoon or a caricature, but a real, three-dimensional person. You would believe her development from this very closed-off, almost hoarder-like existence, to who she is at the end. This is the kind of work I’ve studied to do all my life. You hang on long enough until something like this comes your way, and then you go, “Okay, this one I’ll do. Thank you.”



The role is mostly light, but Doris does have a bit of a breakdown as her family pressures her to clean out her home and move on with her life. If the movie were a little darker, it would have put you back in "Sybil" territory. Is it easy to calibrate the shift between goofy physical humor and serious emotional turmoil?


It’s in trying to put the ingredients together of a character who’s finally pushed so far. She’s not an emotionally articulate person. She has a lot of emotion going on inside of her that she’s not been able to let out, and it’s the moment where it comes out, finally, and it comes out in a dash.


The really incredible voice in this is Michael Showalter and his skill with comedy, which is extraordinary. I was always talking to him about, “How are we going from this high, almost screwball comedy into Greek drama? How do we do this almost back to back?" And he would say, “Trust me. You go there and I’ll tell you if we didn’t make it.” It was a leap, certainly in my mind, because I’ve been around long enough to know how you blend those styles a little bit. I am aware of when one tone is shifting to another and how it has to be done in gradations.


How much did the costumes bring Doris to life? She starts out a little frumpy, then glamorizes herself as she's trying to impress her new love interest. How did your sense of her change after seeing her wardrobe?


Rebecca Gregg and I created the costumes. We did three days of dressing up, putting this shirt on with that pair of pants and saying, “No, that doesn’t work, let’s do this.” The character emerged out of that. Rebecca didn’t know what it was, I didn’t know what it was. And then, at the end of each day, Michael would come over and look at the costumes that we had put together and he would go, “Yes, yes!” It really was an emergence. Nobody presented me with anything. With the help of Rebecca, because she got all this stuff, they allowed me to really just let her rise up out of all this junk and float to the surface.


"Hello, My Name Is Doris" opens March 11. This interview has been edited and condensed. 

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Woman's Painfully Ironic Photo Highlights The Reality Of Homelessness

$
0
0

A heartbreaking photo in front of a Los Angeles mural is creating a lot of backlash, but also starting important conversations about homelessness in the city.


The Sunset Boulevard mural by artist Dallas Clayton bears the words “Stand here and think about someone you love!” Earlier this week, an unidentified woman was spotted taking a seemingly exuberant photo in front of the mural -- and directly in front of a sleeping homeless man.





Local resident Rich Michalowski just happened to be driving by and snapped his own photo of the scene.


“At one point the photographer directed her to move closer to the homeless man so she could center the photo,” Michalowski told TakePart.“They were still at it when I drove away.”


But while many social media users -- and newsheadlines -- disparaged the women in the photo, other people pointed out that their actions really aren’t that different from the way many people ignore the homeless on a daily basis.


“When there is a homeless man in front of the grocery store camped out asking you for money ... most people still walk right by and do their shopping,” wrote one Facebook user, according to TakePart.


A 2014 video, shot in New York City, drove that point home by proving that people didn't even notice their own family members dressed as homeless individuals on the streets.


Artist Clayton wrote on Instagram that he is glad the photo is “stirring a dialogue” and hopes that something meaningful comes of the discussion.


“So in the spirit of thinking about those we love, instead of talking about this woman and her (hopefully momentary) ineptitude can we instead focus on well-researched links to local organizations who are offering their best efforts to fight the uphill battle to help end homelessness in Los Angeles and worldwide.”



I hadn't planned on posting anything about this photo because I didn't want it associated with me or mistaken for anything I support but after receiving a ton of notices and doing an interview with the Daily Mail it would seem that this photo and all it represents have gone viral. While I wish my mural had gotten to make its rounds on a more positive note, I'm glad that this photo is stirring a dialogue and hopefully enlightening some minds. Homelessness is a systemic issue that very few organizations and governing bodies seem to have a good handle on developing a holistic solution to. It's unfortunate that we live in a world, country, state, and city with so many resources and so much potential for progress, yet we still allow people to go without basic needs such as food and shelter. I appreciate that this photo is shining a light on the disparity between the haves and the have nots, but honestly if it takes this photograph for you to realize that this disparity exists I don't imagine you've been paying attention to society as a whole for the past fifty or sixty years. Issues like prison overcrowding, inadequate mental health care and drug policies, lack of support for veterans, and the ever-widening class gap are all just parts of this picture. I wish I had solutions to these issues. I wish we structured changes based around countries that were seeing success in lowering their homeless populations. I also wish that the woman in this photo had connected more with the intention of the mural itself, which was to offer a moment of pause to reflect on what it means to love someone else, to create empathy and bring us closer together as a people. So in the spirit of thinking about those we love, instead of talking about this woman and her (hopefully momentary) ineptitude can we instead focus on well-researched links to local organizations who are offering their best efforts to fight the uphill battle to help end homelessness in Los Angeles and worldwide. I'll be posting new prints this week, and donating 100% of the proceeds to whichever homeless organization you guys think would benefit the most. It's not a solution by any means but hopefully a step.

A photo posted by Dallas Clayton (@dallasclayton) on




 


An estimated 17,000 people live on the streets in Los Angeles.

-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











On 'The Women Tell All,' Black Bachelorettes Take The Fall For Race Problems

$
0
0



From the moment the teaser for "The Bachelor" Season 20's "The Women Tell All" special started rolling, things looked ominous. 


After behaving well and refusing to engage in confrontations with other women in the house, black, Haitian-born contestant Jubilee Sharpe clearly still managed to rub some of the bachelorettes the wrong way -- that much was obvious from watching the season. And in clips teasing "The Women Tell All," it became clear that the other women used the special to circle the wagons against Jubilee, berating her for not sufficiently ingratiating herself with them or participating in house drama. 


Once the special itself got going (after the traditional crashing-of-the-viewing-parties segment featuring Ben and Chris Harrison), any fears awoken in Jubilee fans and critics of the show's race problem were made real. That problematic racial subtext suddenly became text, and it was simultaneously painful to watch, deeply important, and an elision of the real race issue at the heart of "The Bachelor."


As "Bachelor" contestants go, even within this season (remember the episode of "Olivia and 'Teen Mom'"?), Jubilee's transgressions seemed minor, more worthy of a frank chat than a group shaming. She ticked the other women off by making ironic comments downplaying her one-on-one date, yes -- not exactly a malicious crime, but certainly a misunderstanding. She retreated to the bathroom when Amber tried to engineer a group confrontation about this point of tension at a cocktail party, but avoiding overblown interpersonal drama definitely seems like a solid choice, even if it frustrated the other bachelorettes at the time. 


So why did the women present decide Jubilee seemed like such a prime target? Shushanna (remember her?) went out of her way to snidely inform Jubilee that many of the ladies in the house hadn't wanted her to return from her one-on-one date, as if that hadn't been made clear by interviews included in the show itself in which her housemates said just that. 


The submerged racial dynamics at play, as is typically the case on ABC's lily-whitewashed "The Bachelor," were clearly intended to remain unacknowledged, even as a clip of Lauren H. implying that Jubilee wouldn't get along with other "soccer moms," a racial dogwhistle if I ever heard one, replayed on the screen to refresh our memories. 





When they did bubble to the surface, however, it wasn't Chris Harrison, Jubilee, or any of the white contestants who yanked them into the daylight: It was Jami and Amber, the two other black bachelorettes this season. During the season, Amber obviously butted heads with Jubilee. Her ill-fated bathroom confrontation with Jubilee appeared to be the beginning of the end for both, making Amber look like a bully in front of the Bachelor, while planting seeds of doubt in Ben's head as to whether Jubilee gets along with other women. But when Amber and Jami joined forces to call Jubilee out on national TV, the moment was not one "The Bachelor" seemed prepared for.


The actual dispute: Amber and Jami, backed by Shushanna, recalled Jubilee telling them she was "the real black girl" in the house, and would make it further on the show than any "real black girl" ever had. Jubilee initially denied ever saying that, looking truly baffled; after a brief break, the discussion reopened, and she said that she remembered saying that she was "the full black girl" in the house. Later, Jubilee told People magazine, "I said I am the one full black girl in the house. I think of that as a fact." (Amber and Jami both identify as biracial.)





The two women heard something Jubilee says she didn't intend in her words -- that they were not really black women. Ultimately, Jubilee seemed to absorb this and apologized in a manner that seemed very genuine. But the sour flavor of the spat lingered -- especially as none of the other girls, even Lauren H., were asked to apologize to her for their microaggressions, racist implications, and fairly obvious stereotyping of her based on the color of her skin.


A few tweeters pointed out during the show that the dynamic of the Jami/Amber vs. Jubilee debate fell along lines of colorism. Simply put, colorism typically refers to discrimination between lighter- and darker-skinned members of a racial group, often carried out by light-skinned people in the group to the detriment of dark-skinned ones. For example, light-skinned black people may find it easier to get jobs, be perceived as more romantically desirable, or may even be assumed to be smarter and more educated


This issue has drawn a bit of discussion recently thanks to Zoe Saldana's portrayal of Nina Simone in an upcoming biopic, despite Saldana's distinctly lighter skin tone. Since Saldana has been the face of the movie, and the name tossed around by infuriated commentators, it's easy to overlook, or forget to mention, the forces truly at fault for her casting and the perpetuation of colorism. Simone's daughter recently defended Saldana from the attacks arising from the film, pointing out, "she is someone who is part of a larger picture." That larger picture can be glimpsed in the film's writer/director, Cynthia Mort -- a white woman -- and the white-dominated team behind the movie, as Jezebel's Kara Brown pointed out.


LIke "Nina," "The Bachelor" is a Platonic ideal of how colorism is generated and sustained by the white power structure. This form of discrimination may go on within the black community itself, but to leave white discrimination out of the conversation is deeply myopic


Here's how we see it work on "The Bachelor": The show offers few opportunities to black women, and those slots they do fill with black women typically go to lighter-skinned, often biracial black women, like Amber or Leslie Hughes, from Sean Lowe's season, who also identifies as biracial. Silently, it's conveyed to darker-skinned women that to be deemed acceptable for the show, it would really help to be light-skinned black women -- a message all the more difficult to miss because this mirrors how white institutions already privilege light-skinned black people over dark-skinned black people.


When a woman like Jubilee emphasizes her own identity by pointing out that she's the only non-biracial black woman on the season, she makes light-skinned black women feel their identities as black have been erased or dismissed. Alisha Ramos' Mixed Feelings newsletter on the episode focused on how Amber and Jami were displaying a sense of hurt that their identities had been defined by someone else, clearly in a way they disagreed with -- a common frustration for mixed-race people.


Meanwhile, the predominantly white network, producers, and cast members sit back, benefiting from never having to worry about whether their skin color is acceptable in different contexts, and allow the black bachelorettes to fight over the mantel of "token black girl." 





What's particularly fascinating: Usually, we would never see this behind-the-scenes conflict. Race never even overtly came up during the show, though obviously the subject was discussed in the house. We saw the bad blood, the division into factions, but not the nuanced racial tensions that fostered the discord. On "The Women Tell All," Amber and Jami took the opportunity to attack Jubilee, but they really revealed the depths of the tokenism, isolation, and pervasive microaggressions that make life on the show still more treacherous for black women.


As Jezebel's Kate Dries pointed out



Only because of the way this show has historically been cast and structured (with few women of color) did Jubilee feel so impinged -- and therefore vocal -- about the significance of her race versus the races of the other women. Instead of race aligning her with the other women of color, it pitted them against each other (as it often does), arguably undermining all of their chances of being confident enough during the time they did have with Ben to get to know him better.



Aware of their crumbling foothold on a white-dominated show, women like Amber and Jubilee can easily find themselves fighting each other for that tiny sliver of the pie that's been tossed to the black bachelorettes -- the honor of being the token contestant who "makes it furthest," as Jubilee put it.


What can the show really do to improve the situation, not just with lip service or pretensions of color-blindness? One of the tricky aspects of a dating show like "The Bachelor" is that the lead's taste in partners will guide casting, and even more so the few who make it late into the season and earn consideration for casting as the next lead. And unfortunately, racism isn't absent from dating. Studies have suggested that it's easiest for white people in the U.S., and most difficult for black people and Asian men, to get attention in the dating pool.


Bachelor Ben, for all his virtues, has a pretty obvious type: pretty, all-American girls-next-door -- preferably blonde.



That's not something he can change abruptly, but it seems likely it also wasn't something ABC took into consideration during casting. Attractiveness, fan popularity, a late run into the season, "readiness" for love on reality TV and similar traits, we know, come under consideration when the network is casting a lead. But why not whether the lead is interested in dating women of different races? Why not whether she's dated men of color in the past? Making a conscious effort to cast someone with diverse tastes, romantically, is one seemingly nebulous but vital component in diversifying the series. Not to mention the benefit of contestants of color feeling truly in the running, not just as tokens -- a leveling of the psychological playing field that would only improve the odds of a black contestant winning or being made the next lead.


Maybe the rumored casting of Caila Quinn, who is half-Filipina, as the next Bachelorette will push the dial, but it remains to be seen. Based on the show's history, it seems far more likely to be a gesture to appease the increasingly race-conscious masses than a genuine shift in the show's direction. Let's hope there's more to the story.


For more on "The Bachelor: The Women Tell All," listen to the HuffPost podcast "Here to Make Friends" recap the show:


 




-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











The Painter Who Hears Sound In Color

$
0
0

Jack Coulter sees his own heartbeat. People without his condition hear their own heartbeat, and feel it, and Coulter does that, too. But to him, it also radiates color, like the violet glow you see when you look into darkness with an infrared camera. 


Coulter has synesthesia, a rare neurological condition where stimulation of one sense creates an impression by another sense, like hearing a noise and seeing it manifested in color. On stormy nights, he has a recurring dream where he is enveloped in vivid color formations he describes as crystalline holograms that pulsate with the sound of raindrops hitting his window. Asleep and awake, the harsher the sound, the harsher the visualization. Other people with synesthesia experience it differently, reporting an ability to taste color or feel music brushing against their bodies. It's a personal condition.


Working as an artist in Northern Ireland, Coulter creates technicolor paintings with sticks, knives, broken glass and other found objects, coaxing the cheapest paint available into rhythmic formations. Coulter's art has attracted an Instagram following of over 50,000, and he says that prints sold on his website are snapped up so quickly that he's run out of printing materials before.


On the Internet, his fans are reduced to numbers, and he can forget each one corresponds to a real person, although their individual messages remind him otherwise. Coulter is shy. From a very early age, he realized that he experienced the world differently than his friends and family. "I lived in my own world," the artist wrote to The Huffington Post. 


Now, as an adult, he prefers not to speak on the phone. HuffPost interviewed Coulter over email, receiving in his responses both self-reflection and meandering credos. The 21-year-old isn't short on his eccentrically worded beliefs. (A sample: "Preconceived notions asphyxiate reflections of pure expression.") Below is that interview, which has been edited for length and clarity.



Were you always interested in the arts?


Of course. My mum calls me an "art veteran" because my first visit to an art gallery was just a few days after I was born.


I was surrounded by art as a child. My aunt Christine was an abstract printmaker; she was my greatest influence, more so than any known artist. My mum had her prints exhibited all over my house growing up, and I am still to this day fascinated by her work. I have a vivid memory of being at one of my aunt’s exhibitions as a child. I could "hear" her paintings. I used to love showing her my latest paintings every day after school; she mentored me throughout the earliest stages of my artistry. We were very close, and I feel very privileged to have had her influence. She always believed in me, even when no one else did. I sadly lost my aunt to suicide the day before I began art college. 


As a child in my house, it was like growing up in the museum of modern art. My mum and aunt Christine were obsessed with hanging paintings. I always knew that art would be there for me. Art was sewn into my skin from a very early age. I feel sorry for certain kids whose parents are closed, narrow-minded, unconscious individuals.  



How do you plan each of your paintings?


I never plan my paintings. My work arises from a previously unborn life form, never from "pure" psychic automatism. I intend each perceptual abstraction to distribute an abundance of spiritual density. In return, I receive a psychological symmetry, freeing mind and manner. Aesthetic spiritual experience authenticates my work’s inclusive perception of an immutable contingency, thereby working in a perpetual realm of self-realization contributing to a transcendental abundance of creation. "Higher" levels of negative renewal existentially withdraw all doubt from my workings. Inner content rarely arises within. I must only paint to consecutively parallel my emotion. It’s an instinctual, spontaneous endeavor -- the meaning of art exists within the creation of art.


If I’m not creating art, I feel dead inside. I crave art. I don’t believe in God or any concept surrounding theology, although my love for art is almost religious. It all stems from fear of death. My visual perceptions are a constant reminder that I am alive. 



What's your favorite reaction to your art so far?


I received a heartbreaking message from a young girl who was about to commit suicide, when coming across my art changed her mind. I have no control over how an individual will perceive my work. I’ll never forget that moment. She now has her whole life to live. A painting of mine has now dictated her entire life’s existence.


I also very recently received a heartbreaking yet truly inspiring message from a girl regarding my painting titled "Cancer." She reached out to tell me that her mum is severely ill, suffering from Stage IV ovarian cancer, and her mum’s star sign is also Cancer. Her mum had bought a print of my painting for Christmas, which is now framed in her room. It was such an incredibly beautiful message and truly touched my heart -- her mum sounds like a very inspirational woman. She thanked me, although I’m the one who should be thanking her.


What's your favorite mundane activity?


Reading. It’s misconstrued as being mundane. Literature holds a certain type of magic -- it allows each person reading the same passage an intrinsic visual experience in separate minds.


I also love charity shops, or "thrift stores" for all of the American readers. There’s no greater feeling than finding something that truly means something to you. It was my mum and aunt who introduced me to second-hand stores as a child. Ahead of their time, before it became kind of "cool" to shop in those stores. I am also hugely interested in fashion. If I’m not painting, I’ll usually be designing on fabric. I adore designers such as Emilio Pucci and Alexander McQueen.



Bookstores everywhere are setting up adult coloring book displays. New research has also suggested coloring relieves stress and anxiety. Do you ever color? 


I hate that classic story of someone who was an artist when they were younger, although gave it up as they couldn’t pay the bills with it. They end up in a job they hate. If you truly want to do something, you will. Blaming certain situations for your failures is ridiculous. Frida Kahlo was in a very serious accident when she was 18 years old. This prevented her from ever having children. She suffered three terminated pregnancies, and spent many months in a full body cast. Even though she was in excruciating pain, she painted canvases with the little energy she had, and also a full design on her body cast. That is true passion.


I always color, with anything that I can find. I keep a lot of "color journals." I often paint with rose petals or seeped fruit juice when I run out of paint. Nature beholds life’s richest luminosity. 


Do you think synesthesia has made you a more creative person?


To a certain extent, yes, as it’s very inspiring, but it’s just one sole element that stimulates certain areas of my artistry. I have been working in my garage since I was a child, mastering my own personal technique. I sometimes wish that everyone could view the world through my eyes, the color richness of everyday life is indescribable. Every single moment is immersed in tetrachromatic hues.


My imagination has always emanated curiosity. I once thought that I was God and everything around me was a product of my imagination. I was such a strange child.


Have you met other people with your condition?


I actually haven’t met anyone personally who has synesthesia. However, a lot of individuals who have it reach out to me online. Synesthesia is an intricately personal condition; it differentiates vastly from each individual. Trying to explain it through written means is a very complex prospect, but it’s a little easier if you are an artist who has a visual form of communication.


What tips would you give people who want to appreciate their senses more fully?


When art is a pure expression of oneself, there is no greater high. The only way to achieve this is to place yourself in situations that ignite stimulation. Each one of us is an undeveloped photograph; we only develop if we’re exposed to darkness. Our sensitivities are born in the dark. It’s only until the full picture is developed that everything becomes clear.


True beauty exists in retrospect. I’ll finish with my favorite poem by Langston Hughes.



This is a song for the genius child.
Sing it softly, for the song is wild.
Sing it softly as you ever can -
Lest the song get out of hand. 


Nobody loves a genius child.


Can you love an eagle,
Tame or wild?
Can you love an eagle,
Wild or tame?
Can you love a monster
Of frightening name?


Nobody loves a genius child.


Kill him - and let his soul run wild.


-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











This 'Harry Potter' Theory Will Forever Change How You See Gryffindor

$
0
0

Potterheads, we have another fan theory that just might blow your mind.


Tumblr user claudthecat may have cracked the Sorting Hat code. The theory? 


The only way to get sorted into Gryffindor is to ask.


That's right. The Sorting Hat takes requests. Sounds a little far-fetched, but think about it. We already know that Harry was a potential candidate for Slytherin, but asked the Sorting Hat to instead place him in Gryffindor. 





This raises suspicions with other characters.  


Could it be that Hogwarts students can request to be in Gryffindor, even if they have the dominant traits of another house?


Here's the evidence. Ron certainly does not meet Gryffindor's bravery standards and his unwavering loyalty is more of a Hufflepuff trait. Cowardly yet loyal Lupin, for similar reasons as Ron, also seems to be a better fit for Hufflepuff. And let's be honest here, Hagrid clearly belongs in Hufflepuff, too. Yes, he is courageous at times, "but more than anything he's fair, loyal, and unafraid to defend those he loves." Neville also falls into this category. 





Fred and George are cunning, resourceful, clever, and ambitious making them "clear candidates for Slytherin," according to the Tumblr post. After all, those are the signature traits of the house. Moreover, how on earth did Peter Pettigrew end up in Gryffindor? His betrayal of James and Lily, as well as his framing of Sirius for his crimes, makes him more of a Slytherin.





Then there's Dumbledore, arguably the most cunning and resourceful character of the entire Harry Potter series. Some may even argue he's more of a Slytherin than Lord Voldemort himself, which begs the question: 



Why is Albus Dumbledore not a Slytherin???






Arthur Weasley is yet another example of a character who likely belongs in another house. His wild creativity and curiosity make him the perfect Ravenclaw candidate. The same could even be applied to Hermione, whose wisdom, intelligence and wit are easily her most prominent characteristics.





So what's the verdict, Potterheads?








-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.











Viewing all 18505 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images